Skip to content

ACB vs no Block for Pediatric ACL Reconstruction

Comparing Preoperative Adductor Canal vs. No Block for Quality of Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Younger Than 18 Years of Age: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06875427
Enrollment
38
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2025-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear

Keywords

single-shot adductor canal block, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized controlled feasibility clinical trial is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial of adding a perioperative single-shot adductor canal block to standard of care general anesthesia compared to non-regional techniques in pediatric patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The main clinical question it aims to answer is does ACB result in improved Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire scores on postoperative day 2 , postoperative day 14, and postoperative day 42. Secondary questions this study will address are will use of a single-shot adductor canal block result in: less total opioid consumption; shorter post anesthetic care unit (PACU) length of stay; better pain scores at rest and with movement at time of postoperative phone call; and patient satisfaction score at 2 weeks (postoperative day 14). Researchers will compare the scores to patients undergoing the same surgery who will not have a single-shot ACB. All patients will receive the same pre-, peri-, and postoperative care with the exception of being randomized to block or no block. Participants will be asked to answer the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire and rate their pain on a scale of 0-10 on the day of surgery, at postoperative day 2 (by telephone) and at postoperative day 14 and postoperative day 42 during regular orthopedic clinic follow-up. Patients and caregivers will rate their satisfaction at postoperative day 42, using a 5-item Likert scale (ranging from completely dissatisfied to completely satisfied).

Detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are becoming increasingly common among children and adolescents as they are engaging in contact sports at younger ages, which may contribute to a higher incidence of musculoskeletal injuries. This heightened susceptibility could be attributed to increased joint flexibility and potential immaturity in musculoskeletal development, with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) being the primary treatment approach. Effective pain management in the early postoperative phase is crucial, as it significantly impacts the ability to start rehabilitation and return to sports activities. Despite approximately 200,000 adolescents undergoing ACLR annually, there are no established benchmarks for pain management in this population, and significant variability exists in pain management practices in pediatric ACL reconstruction. Regional nerve blocks, such as femoral nerve blocks (FNBs), adductor canal blocks (ACBs), and sciatic nerve blocks (SNBs) are integral components of multimodal analgesia. Recent research in the adult population has shown that multimodal analgesic strategies in arthroscopic surgeries can significantly reduce postoperative opioid consumption and improve quality of recovery. In 2000, following the creation and initial clinical use of a 9-item Quality of Recovery (QoR) score, some authors introduced the 40-item QoR-40 and the shorter QoR-15. The QoR-15 scale provides a comprehensive assessment of postoperative recovery, with scores ranging from 0 (very poor QoR) to 150 (excellent QoR). Since then, the QoR-15 has emerged as the most commonly reported measure of patient-assessed quality of recovery after surgery, validated in the adult population. The investigators plan to perform a prospective randomized controlled feasibility study comparing preoperative single-shot ACB to non-block in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The investigators hypothesize that patients who received ACB preoperatively would have improved analgesia, fewer opioid-related adverse effects, greater patient satisfaction, and shorter PACU recovery times. Feasibility will be determined by enrollment rate, defined as the proportion of participants enrolled over the number of participants approached. We will declare feasibility if the enrollment rate is ≥ 80%.The primary clinical outcome variable is improvement in QoR-15 scores on POD2, POD14 and POD42.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine 2-2.5mg/kg + dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg delivered via a single-shot adductor canal block under ultrasound guidance

The local anesthetic (ropivacaine) + dexmedetomidine will be administered via single-shot adductor canal block under ultrasound guidance

Sponsors

McMaster University
CollaboratorOTHER
Isabella Jaramillo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Research assistants involved in patient recruitment and follow-up.

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized controlled feasibility study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ASA I, II and III * 10-18 years of age * scheduled for ACL reconstruction * agreeable to regional block and follow-ups

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to adductor canal block. * Patients with coagulopathies, preexisting neurologic deficit * Significant comorbidities that may impact recovery or interfere with the study. * Refusal to regional techniques. * Moderate to severe cognitive deficit (patients who are unable to complete the questionnaire) * Patients with history of malignant hyperthermia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Recovery scoresFrom day of surgery until end of study (postoperative day 42), collected at 4 timepoints: Day of surgery, postoperative day 2, postoperative day 14, postoperative day 42Assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, a validated 15-item questionnaire (patient survey). This questionnaire has 15 questions, each of which is answered on an 11-point Likert scale, where 10 = none of the time and 0 = All of the time. Final scores can range from 0 to 150. Scores will be compared between arms to see whether there is a difference in quality of recovery,
Enrollment ratePeriod of recruitment is expected to be 12 monthsTo determine feasibility, as defined as the proportion of participants enrolled over the number of participants approached. The investigators will declare feasibility if the enrollment rate is ≥ 80%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total opioid consumptionDay of surgery to postoperative day 14. Includes opioids used intraoperatively, in post-anesthetic care unit, and post-discharge.Milligrams of opioid per day, quantified as morphine equivalents. Data collected from electronic medical record and on patient visit at postoperative day 14 to clarify amount taken post-discharge.
Patient SatisfactionFrom day of surgery to postoperative day 42. Patient is asked to rate satisfaction on day of surgery and again on postoperative day 42Patient asked to rate satisfaction regarding pain management on a 5-item scale, ranging from Very dissatisfied to Very satisfied
Pain controlFrom day of surgery until end of study (postoperative day 42), collected on postoperative day 0, postoperative day 2, postoperative day14 and postoperative day 42Patient will report pain on an 11-item numerical rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable
Hospital admission for any reasonDay of surgery until postoperative day 42Hospital admission for any reason (yes/no) will be recorded from electronic medical record and from interview with patient
Caregiver SatisfactionFrom day of surgery to postoperative day 42. Caregiver is asked to rate satisfaction on day of surgery and again on postoperative day 42Caregiver is asked to rate satisfaction regarding pain management on a 5-item scale, ranging from Very dissatisfied to Very satisfied
Duration of post-anesthetic care unit stayFrom time of time of hand-off to post-anesthetic care unit staff to discharge from the post-anesthetic care unit (usually by 2 hours [120 minutes])Duration of stay in post-anesthetic care unit, in minutes

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactIsabella Jaramillo, MD
jaramilc@mcmaster.ca905-379-9241
Backup ContactToni Tidy, BSc
tonitidy@mcmaster.ca1-905-525-9140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026