Skip to content

Long-Term Patient-Reported Maternal Outcomes Following Abdominal Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Birth

Long-Term Patient-Reported Maternal Outcomes Following Abdominal Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Birth

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06875401
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-03-05
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerclage, Cervical, Cervical Insufficiency

Keywords

Patient reported outcomes (PRO), Quality of life, Preterm birth, Abdominal cerclage

Brief summary

This study aims to explore the maternal patient reported outcomes on pelvic pain sexual health anxiety and depression bladder discomfort foreign body sensation trust in the cerclage, and how these parameters affect the general health perception in the quality of life of women treated with abdominal cerclages in Denmark since 2004.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAbdominal cerclage (open or laparoscopic)

Participants who have had either an open transabdominal cerclage or laparoscopic abdominal cerclage procedure performed.

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Transabdominal cerclage

Exclusion criteria

* Most recent birth within 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Health Perception scale - SF-36At enrollmentThe difference in general health perception as measured by patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in participants treated with TAC. A difference of 10 points or more is regarded as a clinically relevant difference.
Hospital anxiety and depressen scale (HADS)At enrollmentThe difference in depression and anxiety scores as measured by PROMS in participants who did not give birth since the TAC. The outcome is categorized in normal, borderline abnormal or abnormal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trust in the cerclageAt enrollmentThis issue was conceptualized as trust in the effectiveness of the cerclage to prevent preterm birth. Consists of two qualitatively pilot tested ad hoc questions.
Bladder discomfortAt enrollmentThis issue was conceptualized bladder discomfort as Frequency, nocturia, urgency, urge incontinence (overactive bladder), Incontinence, bladder pain. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire - short form (ICIQ-FLUTS-SF). * Filling (4 items, maximum score 16) * Voiding (3 items, maximum score 12) * Incontinence (4 items, maximum score 16)
Pelvic painAt enrollmentThis issue was conceptualized as pelvic or vaginal pain (pressure, sharp, cramping or pulling) that may be intermittent and worsens with activity or at the end of the day. Questionnaire: The Danish Chronic Pelvic Pain Questionnaire
SF - 36 QOLAt enrollment* Physical functioning (10 items, maximum score 100) * Role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items, maximum score 100) * Role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items, maximum score 100) * Energy/fatigue (4 items, maximum score 100) * Emotional well-being (5 items, maximum score 100) * Social functioning (2 items, maximum score 100) * Bodily pain (2 items, maximum score 100) * General health perceptions (5 items, maximum score 100)
Sexual healthAt enrollmentThis issue was conceptualized as sexual desire, arousal and dyspareunia. Questionnaire: Female Sexual Function Index Scoring (FSFI). * Desire (2 items, maximum score 6) * Arousal (4 items, maximum score 6) * Lubrication (4 items, maximum score 6) * Orgasm (3 items, maximum score 6) * Satisfaction (3 items, maximum score 6) * Pain (3 items, maximum score 6)
Foreign body sensationAt enrollmentThis issue was conceptualized as awareness and reminding of having the cerclage. Consists of two qualitatively pilot tested ad hoc questions.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026