Alcohol Misuse, Sexual Assault
Conditions
Keywords
Sexual assault prevention, Alcohol misuse prevention, Sexual Communication and Consent, eCHECKUP TO GO
Brief summary
Sexual assault and alcohol misuse are interrelated, persist at high rates in military populations, and carry negative consequences for military units and personnel. Combining tailored efforts to prevent sexual assault and alcohol misuse is critical for developing a more effective Force. This study will test the cross-cutting immediate and long-term outcomes of two programs, the Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) sexual assault prevention program and the eCHECKUP TO GO alcohol misuse prevention program, delivered separately and in combination, with Cadets at the United States Air Force Academy. Anonymous Cadet self-report data will be collected before training (pre-test), immediately after training (post-test), 3 months after training (Fall semester follow-up), and 9 months after training (Spring semester follow-up).
Detailed description
Sexual assault and alcohol misuse both persist at high rates among military populations. These behaviors interfere with readiness, unit cohesion, mission objectives, and personnel performance and retention. There are demonstrated associations between sexual assault and alcohol misuse for both perpetrators and victims of sexual assault. Therefore, combining efforts to prevent sexual assault and alcohol misuse is critical for more effective and efficient programming. Moreover, tailored prevention programming that addresses individual risks and experiences related to sexual assault and alcohol misuse is likely to be the most effective programming. Unfortunately, to date, no evidence-based cross-cutting interventions have been developed and evaluated for impacts on both sexual assault and alcohol misuse among military populations. Several challenges impede this effort. Sexual assault prevention and alcohol misuse prevention are typically managed in different organizations within military settings, including within Military Service Academies. Training settings face many competing demands for trainees' time and instructor capacity, and instructors' ability to provide both sexual assault-related and alcohol-related training varies widely. Despite the promise of tailored training, individualized programming also presents feasibility challenges in group education settings common to military training. In alignment with the Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Department of Defense (DoD) Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Research Agenda and DoD's desire to have cross-cutting prevention programs that reduce risk for multiple harmful behaviors, the long-term goal of the proposed work is to address these challenges and provide the military with flexible, engaging, tailored prevention programming that reduces sexual assault and alcohol misuse while minimizing burden on Service members and training settings. To that end, the basic objective of this study is to test the cross-cutting immediate and long-term outcomes of two programs, the Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) sexual assault prevention program and the eCHECKUP TO GO alcohol misuse prevention program, delivered separately and in combination, with Cadets at the United States Air Force Academy. Anonymous Cadet self-report data will be collected before training (pre-test), immediately after training (post-test), 3 months after training (Fall semester follow-up), and 9 months after training (Spring semester follow-up).
Interventions
SCC combines universal classroom instruction with tailored web-based content. Based on sociodemographic characteristics and prior sexual assault experiences, Cadets receive tailored content that addresses either primary victimization prevention, revictimization prevention, or healthy relationships and bystander intervention promotion.
eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized, online intervention designed to reduce cognitive risk factors for alcohol misuse. eCHECKUP TO GO is brief, self-guided, and provides individualized feedback based on a user's self-reported alcohol use patterns and consequences.
TAU involves universal classroom instruction focused on developing knowledge, attitudes, and skills to promote personal resilience, increase potential for success, and develop healthy and rewarding personal relationships.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Quasi-experimental trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* U.S. Air Force Academy Basic Cadet enrolled in 2022 or 2023 Basic Cadet Training
Exclusion criteria
* Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months | Participants self-report whether they experienced any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey. |
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months | Participants self-report whether they perpetrated any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey. |
| Self-reported Alcohol Use | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months | Participants self-report the approximate number of alcoholic drinks they consumed each day of the week during a typical week over the past month (assessed at both the Fall and Spring semester follow-up assessments). Participants who respond with any weekly value greater than 0 alcoholic drinks at either the Fall or Spring semester follow-up are coded as positive for any alcohol use. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of Sexual Assault | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month | The percentage of correct participant responses to 8 true-or-false questions about sexual assault. |
| Knowledge of Effective Consent | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month | The percentage of correct participant responses to 7 true-or-false questions about effective sexual consent. |
| Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month | A subset of participants rate their degree of confidence in their ability to use certain protective strategies in 6 specific high-risk situations. Scale scores range 6 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. |
| Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month | Participants report how many days in the week they estimate the average Cadet of their same age and gender drinks and how many drinks the average Cadet of their same age and gender consumes per day using a modified version of the Quantity/Frequency/Peak questionnaire. The average number of estimated drinks consumed per drinking day is computed from this data and has a possible score range of 0 drinks to 6 drinks. |
| Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month | Participants self-report their readiness to change their drinking behavior using a single item. The possible item score ranges 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater readiness to change. |
| Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months | Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce sexual assault risk using the Dating Self-Protection Against Rape Scale. Scores range 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in dating-related protective behavioral strategies. |
| Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months | Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce alcohol-related harms using an adapted version of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. Scores range 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in alcohol-related protective strategies. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Training as Usual (TAU) TAU without SCC or eCHECKUP TO GO | 556 |
| TAU Plus eCHECKUP TO GO TAU with eCHECKUP TO GO (without SCC) | 401 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) Sexual Communication and Consent without TAU or eCHECKUP TO GO | 632 |
| SCC Plus eCHECKUP TO GO SCC with eCHECKUP TO GO (without TAU) | 396 |
| Total | 1,985 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Training as Usual (TAU) | TAU Plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | SCC Plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 18.33 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98 | 18.35 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86 | 18.29 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 | 18.34 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91 | 18.32 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 45 Participants | 38 Participants | 54 Participants | 37 Participants | 174 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 30 Participants | 14 Participants | 32 Participants | 16 Participants | 92 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple races/ethnicities | 63 Participants | 38 Participants | 61 Participants | 32 Participants | 194 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native American or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other race/ethnicity | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Prefer not to answer or missing | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Spanish/Hispanic/Latino/a | 64 Participants | 39 Participants | 64 Participants | 38 Participants | 205 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 345 Participants | 262 Participants | 396 Participants | 263 Participants | 1266 Participants |
| Self-reported Alcohol Use | 122 Participants | 93 Participants | 130 Participants | 89 Participants | 434 Participants |
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | 88 Participants | 63 Participants | 92 Participants | 69 Participants | 312 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 156 Participants | 118 Participants | 173 Participants | 107 Participants | 554 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 400 Participants | 283 Participants | 459 Participants | 289 Participants | 1431 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 556 | 0 / 401 | 0 / 632 | 0 / 396 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 556 | 0 / 401 | 0 / 632 | 0 / 396 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 556 | 0 / 401 | 0 / 632 | 0 / 396 |
Outcome results
Self-reported Alcohol Use
Participants self-report the approximate number of alcoholic drinks they consumed each day of the week during a typical week over the past month (assessed at both the Fall and Spring semester follow-up assessments). Participants who respond with any weekly value greater than 0 alcoholic drinks at either the Fall or Spring semester follow-up are coded as positive for any alcohol use.
Time frame: From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months
Population: The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-reported Alcohol Use | Pretest | 122 Participants |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-reported Alcohol Use | 9-month follow-up | 18 Participants |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Alcohol Use | 9-month follow-up | 5 Participants |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Alcohol Use | Pretest | 93 Participants |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-reported Alcohol Use | Pretest | 130 Participants |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-reported Alcohol Use | 9-month follow-up | 14 Participants |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Alcohol Use | Pretest | 89 Participants |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Alcohol Use | 9-month follow-up | 9 Participants |
Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration
Participants self-report whether they perpetrated any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey.
Time frame: From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months
Population: The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Pretest | 6 Participants |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Pretest | 6 Participants |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Pretest | 8 Participants |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Pretest | 7 Participants |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization
Participants self-report whether they experienced any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey.
Time frame: From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months
Population: The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Pretest | 88 Participants |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | 9-month follow-up | 1 Participants |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Pretest | 63 Participants |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Pretest | 92 Participants |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Pretest | 69 Participants |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | 9-month follow-up | 0 Participants |
Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use
Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce alcohol-related harms using an adapted version of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. Scores range 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in alcohol-related protective strategies.
Time frame: From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months
Population: The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 60.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.65 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 68.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.65 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 66.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.96 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 63.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.52 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 58.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.22 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 55.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.06 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 64.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.21 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 73.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.5 |
Dating-related Protective Strategy Use
Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce sexual assault risk using the Dating Self-Protection Against Rape Scale. Scores range 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in dating-related protective behavioral strategies.
Time frame: From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months
Population: The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 42.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 39.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.41 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 40.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.04 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 42.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.82 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 40.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.28 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 37.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.22 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | Pretest | 42.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.21 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | 9-month follow-up | 42.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.59 |
Knowledge of Effective Consent
The percentage of correct participant responses to 7 true-or-false questions about effective sexual consent.
Time frame: From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month
Population: The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Pretest value | 96.64 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 6.99 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Posttest value | 97.57 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 5.89 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Posttest value | 97.57 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 5.95 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Pretest value | 96.86 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 6.58 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Pretest value | 96.37 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 7.42 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Posttest value | 98.16 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 4.93 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Pretest value | 96.45 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 6.96 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Effective Consent | Posttest value | 98.53 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 4.57 |
Knowledge of Sexual Assault
The percentage of correct participant responses to 8 true-or-false questions about sexual assault.
Time frame: From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month
Population: The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Pretest value | 78.10 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 14.61 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Posttest value | 82.74 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 13.66 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Posttest value | 81.85 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 13.57 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Pretest value | 76.53 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 15.33 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Pretest value | 78.97 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 14.55 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Posttest value | 90.79 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 11.01 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Pretest value | 78.30 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 15.16 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | Posttest value | 92.32 percentage of correct responses | Standard Deviation 10.11 |
Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use
Participants report how many days in the week they estimate the average Cadet of their same age and gender drinks and how many drinks the average Cadet of their same age and gender consumes per day using a modified version of the Quantity/Frequency/Peak questionnaire. The average number of estimated drinks consumed per drinking day is computed from this data and has a possible score range of 0 drinks to 6 drinks.
Time frame: From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month
Population: The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Posttest value | 3.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.17 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Pretest value | 2.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.69 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Pretest value | 2.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Posttest value | 2.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Pretest value | 3.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.81 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Posttest value | 2.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.53 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Posttest value | 2.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.05 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Pretest value | 2.66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior
Participants self-report their readiness to change their drinking behavior using a single item. The possible item score ranges 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater readiness to change.
Time frame: From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month
Population: The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Pretest value | 0.87 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Posttest value | 1.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Posttest value | 0.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.37 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Pretest value | 1.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Pretest value | 1.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Posttest value | 1.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Pretest value | 0.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Posttest value | 1.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances
A subset of participants rate their degree of confidence in their ability to use certain protective strategies in 6 specific high-risk situations. Scale scores range 6 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month
Population: The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Pretest value | 33.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.91 |
| Training as usual (TAU) | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Posttest value | 34.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.04 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Posttest value | 34.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.58 |
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Pretest value | 33.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Pretest value | 33.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.68 |
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Posttest value | 34.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.45 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Pretest value | 32.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.05 |
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | Posttest value | 35.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |