Skip to content

Evaluation of the Exercise for Wellbeing Pathway at York St John University

On-campus Supervised Physical Activity Programme for University Students Facing Mental Health Challenges: a Feasibility Study Exploring Feasibility, Acceptability, Fidelity and Preliminary Effects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06874699
Enrollment
17
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-02-27
Completion date
2025-09-10
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Health

Keywords

Exercise, Physical activity, Anxiety, Psychological distress, Depression, University student

Brief summary

In autumn 2024, York St John University launched a physical activity programme for university students facing mental health challenges. The purpose of this project is to conduct a mixed-methods evaluative study of this new service over a 6-month period. It is anticipated that 20-40 students will be recruited to the study, which will assess the following: assess the following: feasibility, the extent to which the service can be delivered successfully; acceptability, the extent to which the service is considered appropriate, satisfactory, or attractive by programme recipients and intervention delivery staff; fidelity, the extent to which the key service components (e.g., assessment procedures, physical activity programme) were implemented as planned and adaptations were made; preliminary effects, with relation to physical, mental and social health outcomes.

Interventions

The physical activity programme will have the following features: * 6-week programme * 1-2 supervised physical activity sessions per week * 60 minutes per session, including a mixture of physical activities (e.g. walking, other aerobic physical activity, resistance, balance and stretching exercises) * Self-selected physical activity intensity * Group-based (maximum of 10 students per session) * Sessions supervised by a qualified exercise instructor. A member of the University's Wellbeing team will also be present to offer students mental health support, if needed. * Physical activity behavioral strategies incorporated into the 6-week programme (e.g., goal setting, action planning, exploring barriers and enablers, setting cues or prompts for self-directed PA) * Encouragement to be physically active away from the supervised sessions

Sponsors

York St John University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Student enrolled at York St John University * Age 18 years and over * Undertaking a course which requires attendance at York St John University's Lord Mayor's Walk Campus * Presenting to the student wellbeing team with mild-to-moderate mental health concerns (defined as experiencing symptoms of poor mental health such as feeling depressed or socially isolated, prolonged stress and anxiety, or experiencing academic decline that makes their daily life more difficult but maintain daily functioning) and expressing an interest in enhancing their mental health and daily functioning

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent * Unable to attend (or to participate in) the scheduled physical activity sessions * Unsuccessful physical activity clearance using the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q+)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of recruitmentOver the course of the 6-month enrollment periodThe average number of participants recruited per month
Rate of retentionFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 weeksThe proportion of participants who complete the study
Rate of attendanceFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 weeksMedian number of supervised physical activity sessions attended amongst all participants
Acceptability of the serviceAt the 6-week follow-up assessmentThe extent to which the service is considered appropriate, satisfactory, or attractive by programme recipients and intervention delivery staff. Assessed primarily via one-to-one interviews and an exit survey.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean time per day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activityAssessed at baseline and at the 6-week follow-upAssessed using an Axivity AX6 wrist-worn accelerometer worn continuously for 7 days at each study timepoint
10-item Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) questionnaireAssessed at baseline and at the 6-week follow-upThe minimum index score for ReQoL-10 is 0 and the maximum is 40, where 0 indicates poorest quality of life and 40 indicates highest quality of life.
9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)Assessed at baseline and at the 6-week follow-upThe total score ranges from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
Estimated maximal oxygen uptake (YMCA submaximal cycle test)Assessed before and after the 6-week intervention period
Resting blood pressure (automated)Assessed before and after the 6-week intervention period
Adverse eventsFrom enrollment to the end of the exit assessment after the end of the 6-week intervention period
38-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI-38)Assessed at baseline and at the 6-week follow-upAll the MHI items are scored on a six-point scale (1-6) except for items 9 and 28, which are scored on a five-point scale (1-5). The raw score range is 38-226, with higher scores on the Mental Health Index indicating less psychological distress and greater psychological well-being.
Grip strength (Jamar handgrip dynamometer)Assessed before and after the 6-week intervention period
Lower-limb muscular strength/endurance (30-s sit-to-stand test)Assessed before and after the 6-week intervention period
FidelityFrom enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 weeksThe extent to which the key service components (e.g., assessment procedures, physical activity programme) were implemented as planned and adaptations were made. Assessed primarily via session record data and post-intervention interviews with participants and service delivery staff.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026