Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of no Needle Dental Anesthesia Compared to Syringe Anesthesia Delivery

Randomized Prospective Split Mouth Clinical Evaluation of no Needle Dental Anesthesia Compared to Syringe Anesthesia Delivery

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06874244
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local Anesthesia Injection Pain

Keywords

Local Anesthesia

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate two different ways to administer the numbing solution. One is with a conventional needle and syringe the other method iontophoresis is a machine that supplies a weak current through electrodes that touch your teeth. Both methods use an anesthesia solution to make your teeth numb but the iontophoresis system contains no needle and the delivery device does not penetrate the gum.

Interventions

Injection of lidocaine as local anesthesia

DRUGIontophoresis of Tetracaine and oxymetazoline

Injecting Tetracaine Hydrochloride 4% with 0.5% Oxymetazoline to the oral tissue using iontophoresis technique

Sponsors

Henley Ion
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is at least 18 years of age at the time of consent Subject is able to provide their own informed consent Subject has a minimum 24 teeth/subject and 6 teeth per quadrant Subject has an Approximal Plaque Index score ≤ 40% as assessed via explorer and without the use of plaque-disclosing agents Subject must be able to speak and understand English Subject is able and willing to return for all scheduled study visits Subject to able to make dental appointments Subject should not be a pregnant female Subject meets the Level-I or Level-II classification criteria of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System For Dental Patient Care

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has any of the following: * rampant caries * chronic periodontitis * salivary gland dysfunction Subject is unable, for any reason, to tolerate the procedure time required to place the restorations Subject has unacceptable oral hygiene (e.g., chronic moderate to heavy plaque accumulation along the gumline) Subject is planned to be enrolled in another investigational trial that requires additional interventions at any time during the study Subject is using a whitening agent at any time during this study. Subject has history of allergic reaction to anesthetic medications Subject with uncontrolled systemic disease or conditions Subject is having acute or chronic myofascial pain or neuropathic conditions Subject taking long-term analgesics for their systemic conditions Subject presenting with acute dental pain Subject requiring IV sedation or nitrous oxide sedation or oral sedation for anxiety

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain response in the gingivaUp to 1 hourPain response in the gingiva will be recorded as a yes/no after a painful stimulus is applied using a probe on the buccal and palatal soft tissues.
Cold pulp testUp to 1 hourThe pulpal response will be assessed using a cold pulp test as yes/ no response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain scale: Visual analog scaleBaseline and 2 minutes after delivery of anesthesia.
Beck's anxiety scaleBaseline and 2 minutes after delivery of anesthesia.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026