Skip to content

Efficacy of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Beveled and Conventional Attachments in Aligners

Efficacy of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Beveled and Conventional Attachments in Aligners: a Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06873932
Enrollment
51
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2024-10-25
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Tooth Movement Techniques

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tooth movement using beveled attachments and conventional attachments. The sample will be consecutively selected, comprising participants seeking orthodontic treatment in a private dental office within the recruitment period (from ethics committee approval to July 2027). Participants will be selected and randomized using a split-mouth study design. Groups will be divided into rectangular and beveled attachments, each further subdivided into subgroups for horizontal movements (Group H), vertical movements (Group V), and rotations (Group R), with 20 teeth/attachments per group, totaling a sample of 120 teeth/attachments. Digital study models will be obtained before the start of treatment and immediately after its completion. Additionally, clinical intraoral and extraoral photographs will be taken (pre- and post-treatment). Measurements will be collected from the initial and final digital models to determine the magnitude and direction of movements resulting from treatment. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for each type of dental movement evaluated. Paired tests will be conducted due to the split-mouth design. Correlation tests will be applied if necessary.

Detailed description

Participant recruitment will take place after approval by the Research Ethics Committee until July 2027. The consultations will occur in a private clinic in Curitiba - PR, Brazil. Participants will be selected and randomized according to the split-mouth study design. Teeth on each side will have different attachment configurations to aid orthodontic aligner movements. One side will use rectangular attachments, and the other side will use beveled attachments. Groups will be divided as follows: Group H: 20 teeth/attachments with horizontal displacements (parallel to the occlusal plane) including tipping or mesio-distal translation - premolars and molars. Group V: 20 teeth/attachments with vertical displacements (extrusion and intrusion) - incisors. Group R: 20 teeth/attachments with mesio-distal rotations - canines and premolars. Digital study models (intraoral scanner) will be obtained before and after treatment. These intraoral scans will be analyzed alongside the planned movement models generated by the orthodontic treatment planning software. Treatment efficacy will be analyzed using tooth-tracking methodology in Geomagic Control X, measuring the differences between planned and achieved movements and calculating the percentage of achieved orthodontic tooth movement. Additionally, pre- and post-treatment clinical photographs will be taken: Intraoral: Frontal in occlusion; Right and left lateral views in occlusion; Occlusal views of upper and lower arches. Extraoral: Frontal with lips at rest; Frontal with a wide smile; Profile with lips at rest. All participants will receive orthodontic aligner treatment supervised by a qualified professional capable of providing relevant care under clinical trial conditions. Diagnosis, movement planning, and therapy monitoring procedures (e.g., aligner replacement frequency) for each individual will be established by the researcher, respecting the manufacturer's specified instructions. The sample size was 30 participants will be recruited, totaling a sample of 120 teeth/attachments. Participant satisfaction will be recorded pre-treatment, during follow-up, and post-treatment. In this study, oral health-related quality of life will be assessed through the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile-14) questionnaire as a measure of participant satisfaction with the treatment. Initial and final digital models will be imported using software, where measurements will be taken to identify the magnitude and direction of movements resulting from treatment with different attachment types: Horizontal displacements (parallel to the occlusal plane) including tipping or mesio-distal translation - premolars and molars. Vertical displacements (extrusion and intrusion) - incisors. Mesio-distal rotations - canines and premolars. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for each type of tooth movement evaluated and described by mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, minimum, and maximum. Paired tests will be conducted due to the split-mouth design. Correlation tests will also be applied if necessary.

Interventions

DEVICEArm 1: Beveled Attachments

Beveled attachments applied to 20 teeth in each subgroup (horizontal, vertical, and rotational movements).

DEVICEConventional Rectangular Attachments

Conventional rectangular attachments applied to 20 teeth in each subgroup (horizontal, vertical, and rotational movements).

Sponsors

Neodent
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (18+ years) with permanent dentition * Candidates for aligner-based orthodontic treatment * Require bilateral tooth movements (e.g., extrusion, intrusion, rotation, tipping, mesiodistal translation) * Provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to aligner use (e.g., manufacturer's guidelines) * Poor oral hygiene, active periodontal disease, or TMJ disorders * Allergies to aligner materials (e.g., polyurethane, PETG)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the efficacy of dental movement using beveled and conventional attachmentsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.Difference between the planned movement and the achieved movement, and the percentage of orthodontic dental movement achieved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To measure dental movements achieved with the treatment.From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.To measure the horizontal, vertical, and rotational dental movements achieved with the treatment
Measure the transverse dental changes achieved.From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.Transverse dental changes will be analyzed by comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment digital dental scans.
To assess participant satisfaction throughout the treatment.From enrollment to the end of treatment, not exceeding 24 months.Participant satisfaction will be recorded pre-treatment, during follow-up, and post-treatment. In this study, oral health-related quality of life will be assessed through the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile-14) questionnaire as a measure of participant satisfaction with the treatment.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026