Skip to content

Treatment of Full-Thickness Wounds: NPWT Combined With Type-I Collagen Based Advanced Skin Substitute Versus NPWT Alone

A Comparative Analysis in Treatment of Full-Thickness Wounds: NPWT Combined With Type-I Collagen Based Advanced Skin Substitute Versus NPWT Alone

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06873867
Enrollment
104
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-03-15
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2025-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Full Thickness Skin Defects, Ulcer

Keywords

Full Thickness Skin Defects, Ulcer, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, High Purity Type 1 Collagen, Helicoll

Brief summary

Widely used NPWT has been shown to promote wound healing by applying sub-atmospheric pressure, reducing oedema, and enhancing granulation tissue formation thus enhancing wound healing. However, its efficacy can vary based on wound characteristics and patient factors. High Purity Type-I Collagen (HPTC) based advanced skin substitute has emerged as a potential alternative for wound management, accelerating wound healing through extracellular matrix support. This study aims to compare the efficacy of NPWT combined with HPTC versus NPWT alone in the treatment of full-thickness wounds.

Detailed description

Full-thickness wounds, extending through the dermis and affecting underlying tissues, present significant clinical challenges due to their complexity and prolonged healing times. Traditional treatments include surgical debridement, dressings, and advanced therapies like Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). Widely used NPWT has been shown to promote wound healing by applying sub-atmospheric pressure, reducing oedema, and enhancing granulation tissue formation thus enhancing wound healing. However, its efficacy can vary based on wound characteristics and patient factors. High Purity Type-I Collagen (HPTC) based advanced skin substitute has emerged as a potential alternative for wound management, accelerating wound healing through extracellular matrix support. Studies suggest that HPTC promote cellular proliferation and angiogenesis, essential for tissue regeneration. Given the distinct mechanisms of action of NPWT and HPTC, a comparative evaluation is warranted to determine their relative efficacy in treating full-thickness wounds. This study aims to compare the efficacy of NPWT combined with HPTC versus NPWT alone in the treatment of full-thickness wounds.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh Purity Type-I Collagen based Skin Substitute

In this wound care is covering with High Purity Type-I Collagen based Skin Substitute followed by a layer of non-adherent and porous dressing. After 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed

DEVICENegative Pressure Wound Therapy

In this wound care is by application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using a standard polyurethane foam. The NPWT will be removed after 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed

Sponsors

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must be at least 18 years of age or older. 2. Presence of a full-thickness wound of at least 4 cm² and no more than 100 cm². 3. Wound duration of at least 4 weeks but not exceeding 6 months of standard of care prior to the initial screening visit. 4. Adequate vascular supply to the affected area 5. If the subject has two or more ulcers, they must be separated by at least 2 cm. The largest ulcer satisfying the inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

will be designated as the target ulcer. 6. The subject must agree to attend the twice-weekly/weekly study visits required by the protocol. 7. The subject must be willing and able to participate in the informed consent process.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Wound Area7 weeksPercentage change in wound area from week 1 through week 7 measured manually with digital photography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study - Capillary Density5 daysHistopathological assessment will be done using biopsy on Day 0 of application to be compared with Day 5 after application of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute or Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Histopathology assessed at day 0 and day 5, day 5 reported. Subsequently histopathology of biopsy will be done to look for capillary density (vessels per mm²) - higher count means better,
Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure7 weeksThe time to achieve complete wound closure of the target ulcer by the end of 7 weeks
Percentage of Participants to Obtain Complete Wound Closure7 weeksThe percentage of participants that obtain complete wound closure over the 7 weeks (6 weeks treatment period plus 1 week follow up)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Wound Healing7 weeksMeasurement of percentage of participants achieving ≥50% wound healing (epithelialization) assessed at follow up
Histopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study5 daysHistopathological assessment will be done using biopsy on Day 0 of application to be compared with Day 5 after application of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute or Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Histopathology assessed at day 0 and day 5, day 5 reported. Subsequently histopathology of biopsy will be done to look for: vascular infiltration (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, neo-epithelialization (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, fibroblast activity (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, inflammatory response (0-3 scale) - lower score means better and collagen deposition (0-3 scale) - higher score means better
Number of Adverse Events6 weeksNumber of adverse events related to the intervention (e.g., infection, allergic reactions, NPWT seal issues)
Pain Score on Visual Analog Scale7 weeksPain measured by a Visual Analog Scale with score range from 0 to 10, wherein 0=no pain to 10=severe pain
Healed Wound Appearance Assessment Using Vancouver Scar Scale7 weeksThe resultant new skin is assessed and documented at each visit using the Vancouver Scar Scale, up to 7 weeks, week 7 visit reported, assessing vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height/thickness with total score ranging from 0 to 13 (lesser the score better the scar)
Quality of Life Assessment7 weeksThe EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument is a standardized patient-reported outcome measure assessing overall health-related quality of life. It evaluates five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scoring and Ranges: 1. EQ-5D-5L Index Score - Derived from the five dimensions with five levels each (1 = no problems; 5 = extreme problems). The index score range varies by population value set; for most countries the possible scoring range is approximately -0.594 to 1.000. Higher scores indicate better health status (1.000 = full health). 2. EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) - A self-rated health scale from 0 to 100, where, 0 = the worst health you can imagine, 100 = the best health you can imagine. Higher values reflect better outcomes. Interpretation: Higher scores on both the EQ-5D-5L Index and EQ-VAS represent improved quality of life and a better treatment outcome.
Mean Number of Application6 weeksMean number of rapplications of the NPWT+HPTC & NPWT alone used to obtain wound closure

Countries

India

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
In this study arm, wound is covered with High Purity Type-I Collagen (HPTC) based Skin Substitute applied followed by non adherent porous dressing followed by Negative Pressure Wound Therapy application set at 125mm of Hg pressure for 7 days. Procedure will be redone in case of need. High Purity Type-I Collagen based Skin Substitute: In this wound care is covering with High Purity Type-I Collagen based Skin Substitute followed by a layer of non-adherent and porous dressing. After 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: In this wound care is by application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using a standard polyurethane foam. The NPWT will be removed after 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed
52
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
In this study arm, wound is covered with non adherent porous dressing followed by Negative Pressure Wound Therapy application alone. Pressure is set at 125mm of Hg for 7 days. Procedure will be redone in case of need. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: In this wound care is by application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using a standard polyurethane foam. The NPWT will be removed after 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed
52
Total104

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNegative Pressure Wound TherapyHigh Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyTotal
Age, Customized55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
52 participants52 participants104 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants18 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants34 Participants67 Participants
Wound area (cm²)33.6 square centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
32.8 square centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
33.18 square centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.11
Wound duration (weeks)5.1 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
4.1 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
4.6 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Wound etiology, n (%)
Burns
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Wound etiology, n (%)
Diabetic
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Wound etiology, n (%)
Pressure
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Wound etiology, n (%)
Surgical
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Wound etiology, n (%)
Traumatic
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Wound etiology, n (%)
Vascular
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Wound location, n (%)
Abdomen
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Wound location, n (%)
Back
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Wound location, n (%)
Chest
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Wound location, n (%)
Head and Neck
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Wound location, n (%)
Lower Limb
23 Participants28 Participants51 Participants
Wound location, n (%)
Upper limb
12 Participants8 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 520 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 528 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 520 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change in Wound Area

Percentage change in wound area from week 1 through week 7 measured manually with digital photography

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 7 weeks89.35 percentage changeStandard Deviation 16.08
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 1 week23.73 percentage changeStandard Deviation 11.45
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 2 weeks34.47 percentage changeStandard Deviation 13.28
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 3 weeks45.17 percentage changeStandard Deviation 14.67
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 4 weeks56.45 percentage changeStandard Deviation 15.82
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 5 weeks67.14 percentage changeStandard Deviation 16.45
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 6 weeks78.33 percentage changeStandard Deviation 16.98
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 7 weeks57.85 percentage changeStandard Deviation 12.73
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 4 weeks36.62 percentage changeStandard Deviation 12.74
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 1 week15.21 percentage changeStandard Deviation 9.32
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 6 weeks50.83 percentage changeStandard Deviation 13.72
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 2 weeks22.52 percentage changeStandard Deviation 10.85
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 5 weeks43.97 percentage changeStandard Deviation 13.28
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage Change in Wound AreaWound area reduction at 3 weeks29.85 percentage changeStandard Deviation 11.98
Secondary

Healed Wound Appearance Assessment Using Vancouver Scar Scale

The resultant new skin is assessed and documented at each visit using the Vancouver Scar Scale, up to 7 weeks, week 7 visit reported, assessing vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height/thickness with total score ranging from 0 to 13 (lesser the score better the scar)

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHealed Wound Appearance Assessment Using Vancouver Scar Scale3.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHealed Wound Appearance Assessment Using Vancouver Scar Scale9.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Histopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study

Histopathological assessment will be done using biopsy on Day 0 of application to be compared with Day 5 after application of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute or Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Histopathology assessed at day 0 and day 5, day 5 reported. Subsequently histopathology of biopsy will be done to look for: vascular infiltration (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, neo-epithelialization (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, fibroblast activity (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, inflammatory response (0-3 scale) - lower score means better and collagen deposition (0-3 scale) - higher score means better

Time frame: 5 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyneo-epithelialization (0-3 scale)2.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyinflammatory response (0-3 scale)1.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyfibroblast activity (0-3 scale)2.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studycollagen deposition (0-3 scale)2.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyvascular infiltration (0-3 scale)2.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studycollagen deposition (0-3 scale)1.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyvascular infiltration (0-3 scale)2.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyneo-epithelialization (0-3 scale)1.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyfibroblast activity (0-3 scale)1.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Studyinflammatory response (0-3 scale)2.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Secondary

Histopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study - Capillary Density

Histopathological assessment will be done using biopsy on Day 0 of application to be compared with Day 5 after application of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute or Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Histopathology assessed at day 0 and day 5, day 5 reported. Subsequently histopathology of biopsy will be done to look for capillary density (vessels per mm²) - higher count means better,

Time frame: 5 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study - Capillary Density48.51 vessels per mm²Standard Deviation 8.32
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyHistopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study - Capillary Density42.97 vessels per mm²Standard Deviation 7.85
Secondary

Mean Number of Application

Mean number of rapplications of the NPWT+HPTC & NPWT alone used to obtain wound closure

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyMean Number of Application1.83 number of applicationsStandard Deviation 0.82
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyMean Number of Application4.3 number of applicationsStandard Deviation 1.72
Secondary

Number of Adverse Events

Number of adverse events related to the intervention (e.g., infection, allergic reactions, NPWT seal issues)

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsNPWT seal issues1 number of adverse events
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsSkin irritation around wound1 number of adverse events
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsAllergic reaction1 number of adverse events
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsPain during dressing change0 number of adverse events
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsSevere infection requiring IV antibiotics0 number of adverse events
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsSuperficial wound infection2 number of adverse events
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsSevere infection requiring IV antibiotics0 number of adverse events
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsPain during dressing change2 number of adverse events
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsSuperficial wound infection3 number of adverse events
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsSkin irritation around wound1 number of adverse events
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsNPWT seal issues2 number of adverse events
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Adverse EventsAllergic reaction0 number of adverse events
Secondary

Pain Score on Visual Analog Scale

Pain measured by a Visual Analog Scale with score range from 0 to 10, wherein 0=no pain to 10=severe pain

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 71.51 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleBaseline7.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 16.36 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 25.71 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 34.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 43.98 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 52.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 61.96 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 63.83 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 73.17 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 35.37 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleBaseline7.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 54.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 16.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 44.94 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPain Score on Visual Analog ScaleWeek 25.97 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Wound Healing

Measurement of percentage of participants achieving ≥50% wound healing (epithelialization) assessed at follow up

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Wound Healing49 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Wound Healing27 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants to Obtain Complete Wound Closure

The percentage of participants that obtain complete wound closure over the 7 weeks (6 weeks treatment period plus 1 week follow up)

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage of Participants to Obtain Complete Wound Closure45 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyPercentage of Participants to Obtain Complete Wound Closure22 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Assessment

The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument is a standardized patient-reported outcome measure assessing overall health-related quality of life. It evaluates five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scoring and Ranges: 1. EQ-5D-5L Index Score - Derived from the five dimensions with five levels each (1 = no problems; 5 = extreme problems). The index score range varies by population value set; for most countries the possible scoring range is approximately -0.594 to 1.000. Higher scores indicate better health status (1.000 = full health). 2. EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) - A self-rated health scale from 0 to 100, where, 0 = the worst health you can imagine, 100 = the best health you can imagine. Higher values reflect better outcomes. Interpretation: Higher scores on both the EQ-5D-5L Index and EQ-VAS represent improved quality of life and a better treatment outcome.

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyQuality of Life AssessmentEQ-5D Index Score0.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.102
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyQuality of Life AssessmentEQ-VAS (0-100)88.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyQuality of Life AssessmentEQ-5D Index Score0.71 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.116
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyQuality of Life AssessmentEQ-VAS (0-100)72.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure

The time to achieve complete wound closure of the target ulcer by the end of 7 weeks

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Purity Type-I Collagen Based Skin Substitute With Negative Pressure Wound TherapyTime to Achieve Complete Wound Closure36.81 daysStandard Deviation 12.88
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyTime to Achieve Complete Wound Closure43.94 daysStandard Deviation 16.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026