Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Wearable ECG (AT-Patch) in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Requiring 48-Hour Holter MonitoringEvaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Wearable ECG (AT-Patch) in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Requiring 48-Hour Holter Monitoring

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Wearable ECG (AT-Patch) in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Requiring 48-Hour Holter Monitoring : A Prospective Superiority Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06873828
Acronym
ATP-HCM
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-03-31
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

* Validation of validity, superiority, and safety of data analysis results using AT-Patch compared to 48-hour Holter test results * Number of subjects: 100 (including 10% dropout rate) * Performance and safety were verified by simultaneously attaching a 48-hour Holter and a wearable Holter device (ATP-C75 or ATP-C135).

Detailed description

Prospective, sequential, superiority test Patients diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who require 48-hour Holter monitoring. * 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/total time comparison) * 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/total time comparison) * Comparison between IDs

Interventions

DEVICEATP-C135

A wearable long-term electrocardiogram monitoring device that monitors electrocardiograms by attaching it for up to 14 days.

DEVICEATP-C75

A wearable long-term electrocardiogram monitoring device that monitors electrocardiograms by attaching it for up to 7 days.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female subjects aged 19 years or older 2. Subjects diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who require 48-hour Holter examination

Exclusion criteria

1. Those judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for this clinical trial or those who may increase the risk due to participation in the clinical trial 2. Those with sensitive or allergic skin, skin diseases such as skin cancer or rashes 3. Those with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, or other implantable electrical devices 4. Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of arrhythmia detection rates between the test group and the control group after using a medical device for clinical trialsATP-C75 : 7day , ATP-C135 : 14day* 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/7days) * 48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/14days)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arrhythmia detection rate by test time in the test group and control group after using the clinical trial medical device■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/7days) ■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/ 14days)Comparison of control and test period (48hrs vs total time) Comparison by disease type Comparison of test period ATP-C135 : 14day / No f/u ■ Safety Issue ATP-C75 : 7day ATP-C135 : 14day
Comparison of the concordance rate of the analysis results of the simultaneous attachment time in the test group and control group after using the clinical trial medical device■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison) ■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison)Comparison of control and test period (48hrs vs total time) Comparison by disease type Comparison of test period ATP-C135 : 14day / No f/u ■ Safety Issue ATP-C75 : 7day ATP-C135 : 14day
User response evaluation (satisfaction) in the test group and control group after using the clinical trial medical device■48-hour Holter : 48hrs ■ATP-C75 : 7days ■ATP-C135 : 14daysComparison of control and test period (48hrs vs total time) Comparison by disease type Comparison of test period ATP-C135 : 14day / No f/u ■ Safety Issue ATP-C75 : 7day ATP-C135 : 14day
Arrhythmia detection rate in the test group and control group by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy subtype (Apical HCM, Non-apical HCM)■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C75 (48-hour comparison/7days) ■48-hour Holter vs ATP-C135 (48-hour comparison/ 14days)Comparison of control and test period (48hrs vs total time) Comparison by disease type Comparison of test period ATP-C135 : 14day / No f/u ■ Safety Issue ATP-C75 : 7day ATP-C135 : 14day
Arrhythmia detection rate by test group (ATP-C75, ATP-C135)■ATP-C75 vs ATP-C135 ( 7days vs 14days )Comparison of control and test period (48hrs vs total time) Comparison by disease type Comparison of test period

Contacts

Primary ContactIk-Seong Cho, MD,PhD
IKSUNGCHO@yuhs.ac82-10-8975-2413

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026