Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Reducing Fatigue and Improving Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Reducing Fatigue and Improving Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06873464
Acronym
tDCS
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-03-12
Start date
2025-02-20
Completion date
2025-08-31
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, MS

Keywords

Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation, fatigue, multiple sclerosis

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the application of three 2-week cycles of tDCS combined with motor therapy is more effective in reducing fatigue in adult patients with multiple sclerosis, compared to the application of two cycles of the same treatment. The main questions aim to answer: * Is the application of three 2-week cycles of tDCS combined with motor therapy (experimental group) more effective for the recovery of fatigue in adult patients with multiple sclerosis compared to the application of two cycles of the same treatment (control group)? * Is tDCS combined with motor therapy effective in improving fatigue in adult patients with multiple sclerosis in both study arms, i.e., in the pre-post assessment of the experimental group and the pre-post assessment of the control group? Researchers will compare the application of three 2-week cycles of tDCS combined with motor therapy (experimental group) to the application of two cycles of the same treatment (control group) to see if the experimental group shows greater recovery of fatigue in adult patients with multiple sclerosis. Participants will: * Visit the clinic for two weeks to be evaluated (baseline measurement and first post-treatment assessment) and receive the first cycle of treatment from Monday to Friday. * Have a washout period of one month between the first and the second cycle. * Visit the clinic for two weeks to receive the second cycle of treatment and be evaluated (second post-treatment assessment). * Only participants in the experimental group will have another washout period of one month and visit the clinic to receive a third cycle of treatment and to be evaluated (third post-treatment assessment). * Only participants in the control group will visit the clinic one and a half months after completing their second cycle to be measured as a follow-up.

Interventions

OTHERThree cycles of tDCS combined with motor tasks

Three cycles of 2 weeks duration each combining tDCS and motor task. Initial Assessment (V0): Collect demographic data and EDSS, MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS results. First Cycle: 2 weeks, Monday to Friday, with a weekend break. Post-First Cycle Assessment (V1): Reassess MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS. Washout Period: 1 month without tDCS. Second Cycle: 2 weeks, Monday to Friday, with a weekend break. Final Assessment after Second Cycle (V2): Reassess MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS. Washout Period: 1 month. Third Cycle: 2 weeks. Final Assessment after Third Cycle (V3): Reassess MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS.

OTHERTwo cycles of tDCS combined with motor tasks

Initial assessment (V0): Prior to the first tDCS cycle, demographic data and results from the EDSS, MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS scales will be collected. First cycle: 2 weeks Post-first cycle assessment (V1): Reassess MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS scales. Washout period: 1 month without tDCS treatment. Second cycle: 2 weeks, with sessions from Monday to Friday and a weekend break. Final assessment (V2): After the second cycle, reassess MFIS, MSQOL-54, and BBS scales. Follow-up assessment (V3): 45 days after treatment completion.

Sponsors

European University of Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with multiple sclerosis defined according to the McDonald criteria (2017 revised version). * Age between 18 and 75 years. * No relapse in the last 2 months. * Fatigue experienced in the last 6 months, according to the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS \> 4).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have not had stable pharmacological treatment in the last month. * Patients with contraindications to the use of tDCS, such as: defibrillator, pacemaker, brain stimulator, implanted intracranial metals, skull fractures or fissures, damaged skin or recent scars, epilepsy, pregnancy. * Patients who are undergoing or need to undergo immunosuppressive treatment for MS with Ocrelizumab, Rituximab, Lemtrada, or Mavenclad one week before or during the application of tDCS. * Patients with cognitive difficulties that prevent them from understanding the applied scales. * Patients who experience adverse effects from tDCS treatment. * Inability to remain in the study and complete the third cycle and/or the V3 assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue ImpactAssessed at baseline (V0), after 2 weeks (V1), after 6 weeks (V2), and after 14 weeks (V3).Fatigue Impact Scale measures the impact of fatigue on daily functioning across three domains: cognitive, physical, and psychosocial. It consists of 40 items rated on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 4 (extreme problem). The total score ranges from 0 to 160, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue impact. Subscale scores are also calculated for each domain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life assessmentAssessed at baseline (V0), after 2 weeks (V1), after 6 weeks (V2), and after 14 weeks (V3)Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life - 54 (MSQOL-54) is a multidimensional health-related quality of life measure combining generic and MS-specific items. It includes 54 items generating 12 subscales and two summary scores (physical and mental health). There is no single overall score. Subscale scores and summary scores are derived from a weighted combination of scale scores. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
BalanceAssessed at baseline (V0), post-first cycle (V1, after 2 weeks), post-second cycle (V2, after 6 weeks), and post-third cycle (V3, after 14 weeks)).The Berg Balance Scale assesses static balance and fall risk through 14 tasks, each scored from 0 (lowest function) to 4 (highest function). The total score ranges from 0 to 56. Scores below 45 indicate a higher risk of falling.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026