Skip to content

EMG Biofeedback and NMES of Deltoid in Patients With rTSA

Electromyography Biofeedback and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of Deltoid in Patients With Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06873022
Enrollment
34
Registered
2025-03-12
Start date
2025-03-15
Completion date
2025-05-20
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Reverse Shoulder Replacement

Keywords

reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, surface electromyography, biofeedback, scapulohumeral rhythm

Brief summary

The effect of NMES and surface electromyography (sEMG) biofeedback on the deltoid and associated scapular muscles in scapular kinematics and muscle activation in individual post rTSA

Detailed description

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been the optimal treatment for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy. Since scapular kinematics alteration was associated with shoulder disorders, scapular kinematics had been characterized in individuals post rTSA with more upward rotation, external rotation, and posterior tilt of the scapula. In addition, the average scapulohumeral rhythm ranged from 1.1 to 1.6, indicating lower glenohumeral joint movements and higher scapulothoracic movements. It supposed that more scapula upward rotation without adequate humeral elevation can result in the scapula notching. Therefore, strategy to decrease scapular movement or increase humeral movements during arm movements may prevent scapula notching. To compensate for rotator cuff deficiency, the deltoid muscle plays a crucial role post rTSA. Enhancing deltoid function can be accomplished through the use of biofeedback or neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). However, the effect of NMES and surface electromyography (sEMG) biofeedback on the deltoid and associated scapular muscles in scapular kinematics, muscle activation, and muscle balance ratio in individual post rTSA remained unclear. Therefore, the objectives in this study would to (1) determine the immediate effects of NMES with EMG biofeedback to deltoid (D) on the muscle activation of upper trapezius (UT), lower Trapezius (LT) and serratus Anterior (SA) as well as the scapular kinematics (upward/downward rotation, external/internal rotation, anterior/posterior tilting) (2) evaluate the immediate effects of NMES with EMG biofeedback on the muscle balance ratios (D/UT, D/LT, D/SA) and the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) during arm elevation in the scapular plane at different range of motion.

Interventions

DEVICEneuromuscular electrical stimulation

NMES: Two electrode pads were placed on the anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid boundary lines and at a distance of 1cm distal to the lateral margin of the acromion. The operator palpated the deltoid muscle contraction and asked the subjects to perform arm elevation task with NMES. (frequency of 35 Hz and a duration of 250 microseconds.) A verbal cue was given during both th A verbal cue was given during both the sEMG biofeedback and NMES interventions: Lengthen your arm as if you want to touch the ground, the scapula keeps in the neutral position, and then elevate your arm. Each intervention consisted of 3 sets of 10 repetitions per set, with a 1-minute rest between sets.

DEVICEbiofeedback

sEMG biofeedback: Subjects were instructed to monitor the sEMG signals of the D/UT balances ratio on the screen and maintain the D/UT balances ratio above the threshold during arm elevation and lowering. The threshold was set at 1 standard deviation of the ratio average at baseline (before intervention).

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (1) age between 20 to 85 years old * (2) undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty * (3) shoulder abduction in scapular plane above 90 degrees * (4) above 3 months following rTSA

Exclusion criteria

* (1) a history of other shoulder surgery on the rTSA shoulder * (2) a revision rTSA * (3) a surgery shoulder muscle tendon transfer * (4) neuromuscular diseases * (5) cognitive disorders * (6) contraindications for NMES

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle activationbefore intervention (baseline) and through intervention completion, an average 15 minutes in each intervention (sEMG biofeedback or NMES)Muscle activation The muscle activation of upper trapezius, lower trapezius, serrates anterior, and deltoid were collected during arm elevation task by sEMG at baseline, post- sEMG biofeedback, and post- NMES. Muscle activation was analyzed based on 0°-30°, 30°-60°, and 60°-90° during arm elevation and lowering. The sEMG data was calculated using the root mean square (RMS) based on average of middle three from five trials. The MVIC of UT, LT, SA, and D were used to normalize the sEMG data.
Scapular kinematicsbefore intervention (baseline) and through intervention completion, an average 15 minutes in each intervention (sEMG biofeedback or NMES)Scapular kinematics The scapular kinematics during arm elevation task was captured using an electromagnetic motion analysis system. The three scapula orientations were described using the Euler angle sequence with an X-axis for scapular posterior/anterior tilt, Y-axis for scapular upward/downward rotation, and Z-axis for scapular internal/external rotation. The average of middle three from five trials on scapular kinematics were analyzed at 30°, 60°, and 90° arm elevation and lowering.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle balance ratiosbefore intervention (baseline) and through intervention completion, an average 15 minutes in each intervention (sEMG biofeedback or NMES)Muscle balance ratios The muscle balance ratios of D/UT, D/LT, and D/SA were calculated based on average of middle three from five trials at the phases of 0°-30°, 30°-60°, and 60°-90° during arm elevation and lowering phase.
Scapulohumeral rhythmbefore intervention (baseline) and through intervention completion, an average 15 minutes in each intervention (sEMG biofeedback or NMES)Scapulohumeral rhythm The scapulohumeral rhythm data was collected by humeral elevation relative to scapular upward rotation at the phases of 30°, 60°, and 90° arm elevation and lowering in scapular plane. The data was based on average of middle three from five trials.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYANG-TING CHIEN
yangting890218@gmail.com+886980602820
Backup ContactJiu-Jenq Lin, Ph.D
jiujlin@ntu.edu.tw+8862-3366-8126

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026