Skip to content

The Effect Of Using Sticky Bone With Coronally Advanced Flap In Management Of Type 1 Gingival Recession

The Effect Of Using Sticky Bone With Coronally Advanced Flap In Management Of Type 1 Gingival Recession

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06871475
Enrollment
22
Registered
2025-03-12
Start date
2025-03-31
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession, Localized

Brief summary

the main goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of sticky bone with coronally advanced flap in management of gingival recession in comparison to coronally advanced flap alone

Interventions

using coronally advanced flap alone in treating gingival recession

BIOLOGICALsticky bone with coronally advanced flap

using sticky bone with coronally advanced flap in treating the gingival recession

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Selected patients of both sexes with age range 25-45 years old. 2. Patients are systemically healthy based on questionnaire dental modification of Cornell index. 3. O'Leary index (1972) is less than 10% (the surgical therapy is not initiated until the patient reaches the 10% level or less of plaque accumulation). 4. Buccal recession defects are classified RT1 according to Cairo's classification (2011). 5. Clinical indication and/or patient request for recession coverage.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant female. 2. Smokers. 3. Patients with special needs or with any mental problems. 4. All patients are using any kind of medications that could interfere with healing of periodontal tissues. Such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 5. Teeth with carious lesions. 6. Rotated and extruded teeth. 7. Patient undergone any prior periodontal surgery in the relevant region within year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recession depthchanges in millimeters from base line up to 6 monthsis measured from CEJ to the gingival margin in millimeters.
thickness of keratinized gingivachanges in biotype in millimeters from base line to follow up after 6 monthsthickness of the keratinized gingiva in the faciolingual direction (gingival biotype)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recession Widthchanges in millimeters from base line to follow up after 6 monthsthe widest point from the mesial gingival margin to the distal gingival margin in millimeters
the height of keratinized gingivachanges in millimeters from base line up to 6 monthsthe distance from the mucogingival junction to the gingival margin
percentage of root coveragechanges in percentile from base line up to 6 monthsit is the \[pre-operative gingival recession depth - post-operative recession depth\]/ \[preoperative recession depth\] \* 100%
Probing pocket depthchanges in millimeters from base line up to 6 monthsthe distance from the gingival margin to base of pocket.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactshaimaa mohamed ibrahim
shaimaa.ibrahim121@gmail.com00201150007844

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026