Skip to content

Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced vs. PFM Attachments in Distal Extension RPDs

Evaluation of Periodontal Health and Patient Satisfaction of CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced Composite Versus Porcelain Fused to Metal Extracoronal Attachment in Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06871020
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-03-11
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2026-03-15
Last updated
2026-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Distal-extension Prostheses

Keywords

CAD/CAM, Fiber Reinforced Composite, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture, Partial, Removable

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to assess periodontal health and patient satisfaction in mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures using CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite versus porcelain-fused-to-metal extracoronal attachments. Twelve participants with bilateral mandibular Kennedy Class I, retaining only the first premolars as the last standing abutments, will be randomly assigned to two groups. Group I will receive OT extracoronal attachments made from CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite, while Group II will receive OT extracoronal attachments made from porcelain-fused-to-metal. All participants will then receive a metallic removable partial denture. The null hypothesis states that no significant differences will be observed in periodontal health and patient satisfaction between the two attachment types.

Detailed description

Twelve participants with bilateral maxillary Kennedy Class I, with the first premolars as the last standing abutments, will be recruited based on strict inclusion criteria from the oral and maxillofacial prosthodontic outpatient clinic. The canines and first premolars will be prepared to receive OT extracoronal attachments made from either CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite (Group I) or porcelain-fused-to-metal (Group II), according to group allocation. All participants will then receive a metallic removable partial denture. Periodontal health will be assessed through bleeding index, probing depth, and gingival recession at denture insertion and after six months and twelve months. Patient satisfaction will also be evaluated at the twelve-month follow-up.

Interventions

OTHERMandibular removable partial denture retained on OT extracoronal attachment made from fiber-reinforced composite resin

Bilateral OT extracoronal attachments will be milled from fiber-reinforced composite resin after obtaining impressions of the prepared abutments. This will be followed by an overall impression of fabricating a Co-Cr removable partial denture to be retained in the attachments.

OTHERMandibular removable partial denture retained on OT extracoronal attachment made from porcelain-fused to metal

Bilateral OT attachments manufactured from porcelain fused to metal by conventional technique after obtaining impressions of the prepared abutments. This will be followed by an overall impression of fabricating a Co-Cr removable partial denture to be retained in the attachments.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Mandibular partially edentulous bilateral distal extension Kennedy Class I with first premolars as last abutments. 2. The opposing maxillary arch will be dentate. 3. Angle class I maxillomandibular skeletal relation. 4. The distal extension ridge will be well-formed and covered by healthy and firm mucosa. 5. As verified by periapical radiographs, Abutments have healthy periodontal ligaments and an appropriate crown/root ratio (CRR). 6. Crown/root ratio of the premolar abutment teeth is not less than 1:1. 5. 7. The vertical distance between the ridge tissue and the opposing teeth of the study cases is not less than 7 mm. 6. 8. The buccolingual dimension of the abutment teeth is not less than 6 mm.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with any systemic disease that could affect the rate of bone resorption, which was confirmed by obtaining a through medical history. 2. Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism and clenching). 3. Patients with any septic foci or impacted teeth as proved by panoramic radiograph, as well as patients with tilted or rotated abutments or soft tissue undercuts in areas that will be involved in the RDP design. 4. Patients with any TMJ problems. 5. Patients with any neuromuscular diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Bleeding indexAt denture insertion ( baseline 0) and six months (180 days) after delivery of mandibular removable partial denture retained on double OT Extracoronal attachmentsThe bleeding Index will be evaluated at denture insertion and after six months (180 days: Assessed using Mombelli's Bleeding Index, which scores bleeding on probing (BOP) from 0 (no bleeding) to 3 (heavy bleeding).
Evaluation of Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)At denture insertion ( baseline 0), six months (T1) , and 12 months (T2) after delivery of mandibular removable partial denture retained on double OT Extracoronal attachmentsEvaluation of Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)will be evaluated at denture insertion and after six months: Measured on buccal and lingual aspects of the four abutments following the American Academy of Periodontology protocol. Six readings per abutment will be averaged.
Evaluation Gingival Index (GI)At denture insertion ( baseline 0), six months (T1) , and 12 months (T2) after delivery of mandibular removable partial denture retained on double OT Extracoronal attachmentsEvaluation of Gingival index: Evaluated using Löe and Silness (1963), scoring gingival inflammation from 0 (healthy) to 3 (severe inflammation with spontaneous bleeding).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Patient SatisfactionAfter tweleve months (180 days) after delivery of mandibular removable partial denture retained on double OT Extracoronal attachmentsPatient satisfaction will be evaluated using the McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS). Satisfaction will be measured across multiple aspects, including ease of cleaning, speech ability, comfort, esthetics, stability, mastication of various foods, masticatory efficiency, oral condition, and overall satisfaction. Patients will rate each item on a 0-100 scale, where 0 represents complete dissatisfaction and 100 indicates total satisfaction.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOROmnia M. Refai, PHD

Ain Shams Univeristy

STUDY_DIRECTORNoha Helmy Hassan Nawar, PHD

Ain Shams Univeristy

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHeba A. Salama, PHD

Misr International University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAbdel Rahman Maged, PHD

Misr International University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 9, 2026