Skip to content

Cooperative Extension and Cancer Survivorship

Cooperative Extension and Cancer Survivorship: Supportive Care Via Cooperative Extension Services (SUCCESS)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06869512
Acronym
SUCCESS
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-03-11
Start date
2025-02-24
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Survivorship

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a cancer survivor program, delivered via Cooperative Extension, is feasible and if it can improve health outcomes in cancer survivors who are post-active treatment. Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of SUCCESS. Hypothesis 1: SUCCESS will be feasible and acceptable as evidenced by delivery of the intervention among Educators (implementation), including in agreement with the curriculum in Phase 1 (fidelity) with \>85% attendance (demand) among participants with \>80% rating the intervention as acceptable or highly acceptable on 5-point Likert-type scale (acceptability). Aim 2: Determine the preliminary efficacy of SUCCESS for improving HRQOL (primary outcome) and other psychosocial and health-related endpoints (e.g., financial toxicity) (secondary outcomes). Hypothesis 2: Compared to matched controls, adults LWBC who complete SUCCESS will have significant improvements in HRQOL per the PROMIS Global Health v1.2 at follow-up (i.e., after 6 weeks). Aim 3: Examine changes in conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) gene expression in a subset of interventions participants at follow-up. Hypothesis 3: Adults LWBC who complete SUCCESS will experience significant CTRA down-regulation. This is a single arm trial and there is no comparison group. Participants will be asked to do survey- and Zoom-based data collection before and after completing the 6-week program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSUCCESS

6 group-based sessions with 25 minutes of didactic content, 25 minutes of facilitated support group, and 10 minutes of group physical activity

Sponsors

Oklahoma State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oklahoma
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Previous adult-diagnosed cancer * Post active cancer treatment * No current active treatment, hormonal therapy permitted * Ability to get to group sessions * In Oklahoma

Exclusion criteria

* Current palliative or hospice care * Surgical or medical history that precludes participation * Positive screen on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire+ (PAR-Q+) without a doctor's note approving study participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delivery of sessionsOnce per week for six weeksWe will measure the percent of SUCCESS sessions delivered as planned by Educators
Fidelity to SUCCESS protocolOnce per week for six weeksWe will measure what percentage of planned SUCCESS content is delivered as instructed.
Participant attendanceOnce per week for six weeksWe will measure how many enrolled participants attend each SUCCESS session
Acceptability of SUCCESSMeasured after SUCCESS (week 7-8 of the clinical trial)We will administer a feasibility survey after SUCCESS for participants to rate how much they liked it. Rating will be on a 5-point Likert Scale (How would you rate this program? 1=poor, 5=excellent)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LonelinessBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Loneliness will be measuring using the UCLA Loneliness Scale. This provides a numeric score from 20-80, with higher=more loneliness.
Social isolationBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Social isolation will be measured using the PROMIS Social Isolation Short Form (SF). This provides a numeric score from 4-20, with higher scores indicating more social isolation.
Financial ToxicityBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Financial toxicity will be measured using the COST: A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST). The FACT-COST provides a numeric score from 0-44, with higher meaning better financial well-being.
Health-related quality of lifeBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be measured using the PROMIS Global Health v1.2, which yields Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health Scores, both of which range numerically from 4-20; higher indicates better HRQOL.
Diet qualityBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)We will measure diet quality as assessed via the National Cancer Institute Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ). Outputs from the DSQ are intake of fruits and vegetables (cup equivalents), dairy (cup equivalents), added sugars (teaspoon equivalents), whole grains (ounce equivalents), fiber (g), and calcium (mg).
Basic psychological needsBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Basic psychological needs according to Self-Determination Theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness) will be measured using the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Scale. This provides three scores (one per psychological need) that ranges from 1-7, with higher=more of that need met.
Self-reported painBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Pain will be measured using the Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) scale which provides a numeric score from 0-10, with 10=more pain and more interference from pain.
Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity (CTRA) gene expressionBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Remote blood sampling procedures will be used to collect blood spots. RNA will be extracted from spots and sequenced for quantification of the 53-gene contrast score that comprises CTRA. This will only be done in a subset of participants.
Food insecurityBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Food insecurity will be measured using the USDA 6-item food insecurity screener. This yields a numeric score from 0-6, with higher=more food insecurity,
Physical functionBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)We will measure physical function using the 30-second Timed Chair Rise (30sTCR), measured in seconds.
Depressive symptomsBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). This provides a numeric score from 0-27, with higher=more depression
Anxiety symptomsBaseline (week 1) and post-SUCCESS (week 7-8)Anxiety symptoms will be measured using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). This provides a numeric score from 0-21, with higher=more anxiety.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAshlea C Braun, PhD
ashlea-braun@ouhsc.edu15672401582

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026