Skip to content

A Clinical Comparison of Proclear® 1 Day Multifocal and Clariti® 1 Day Multifocal 3 Add

A Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Multifocal Contact Lenses - Proclear® 1 Day Multifocal and Clariti® 1 Day Multifocal 3 Add

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06869044
Enrollment
67
Registered
2025-03-11
Start date
2025-02-11
Completion date
2025-06-26
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperopia, Myopia, Presbyopia

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the overall lens satisfaction between two soft multifocal contact lenses.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to evaluate the overall lens satisfaction between two soft multifocal contact lenses when compared to each other after 15 minutes of daily wear each.

Interventions

DEVICELow ADD power somofilcon A lens

Participants will be randomized to wear low ADD power somofilcon A lens for 15 minutes.

DEVICEMedium ADD power somofilcon A lens

Participants will be randomized to wear medium ADD power somofilcon A lens for 15 minutes.

DEVICEHigh ADD power somofilcon A lens

Participants will be randomized to wear high ADD power somofilcon A lens for 15 minutes.

DEVICEomafilcon A lens

Participants will be randomized to wear omafilcon A lens for 15 minutes.

Sponsors

CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
University of California, Berkeley
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. They are at least 18 years of age. 2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. 3. They habitually use soft contact lenses (multifocal soft contact lenses, sphere lenses for monovision, sphere lenses for distance vision correction and spectacles for near vision correction,) and have done so for at least the past three months. 4. They have a minimum reading add of +0.75DS (based on their spectacle refraction) 5. They have spherical equivalent refractive error between +6.00 to -10.00DS at the corneal plane and refractive astigmatism of no greater than -0.75DC in each eye. 6. They are able to achieve distance HCVA of +0.10 logMAR or better in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 3. They are aphakic. 4. They have had corneal refractive surgery. 5. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall lens satisfactionAt the end of 15 minutes wearOverall Impression recorded on a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 where (0=Extremely poor. Unmanageable. Cannot use lenses, 100=Excellent. Highly impressed with these lenses overall.)

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMeng C Lin, OD, Ph.D

UC Berkeley

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026