Skip to content

Pulsed-Field Ablation Vs. Radiofrequency Ablation CombIned with Vein of Marshall Ethanol Ablation on Mitral Isthmus Block and Clinical Outcomes in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Pulsed-Field Ablation Vs. Radiofrequency Ablation CombIned with Vein of Marshall Ethanol Ablation on Mitral Isthmus Block and Clinical Outcomes in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: the PRIME-AF Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06866704
Acronym
PRIME-AF
Enrollment
154
Registered
2025-03-10
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Keywords

persistent atrial fibrillation, pulsed field ablation, EI-VOM

Brief summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common clinical arrhythmias, and catheter ablation serves as a critical therapeutic approach. For persistent atrial fibrillation, several proposed ablation strategies-including the 2C3L technique, BOX lesion sets, and substrate modification-remain highly controversial regarding long-term success rates. Multiple studies suggest that linear ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) often fails to achieve durable block due to incomplete ablation lines, which significantly contributes to postoperative recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. In recent years, electrophysiologists have explored various methods to improve mitral isthmus (MI) ablation, such as combined endo-epicardial ablation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with Marshall vein alcohol ablation. While RFA combined with anhydrous alcohol injection into the Marshall vein enhances MI block rates, it is associated with prolonged procedure time, unpredictable ablation zones, and higher complication risks (e.g., coronary artery spasm, pericarditis). Pulsed field ablation (PFA), an emerging non-thermal ablation technology, offers potential advantages such as tissue selectivity, shorter procedure time, and fewer complications. Studies report that RFA achieves near 100% immediate block rates; however, there is a lack of sufficient comparative studies on the efficacy and safety between these two ablation approaches. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and safety profiles of PFA versus RFA combined with Marshall vein alcohol injection in patients with persistent AF.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcatheter ablation

In the experimental group, patients receive pulsed field ablation (PFA) to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), circumferential BOX ablation around bilateral pulmonary veins, and mitral isthmus ablation. In the control group, anhydrous alcohol is first injected into the Marshall vein, followed by radiofrequency catheter ablation to complete PVI, BOX lesion sets, and mitral isthmus ablation.

Sponsors

lingzhiyu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Persistent atrial fibrillation; 2. Ejection fraction \>30%; 3. NYHA functional class I-III; 4. Left atrial diameter \<55 mm on echocardiography; 5. Signed informed consent form;

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating women; 2. Patients with a life expectancy of less than 2 years due to non-cardiovascular factors; 3. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, severe liver or kidney dysfunction; 4. History of atrial fibrillation ablation; 5. History of heart transplantation, complex congenital heart disease, or rheumatic heart disease; 6. Contraindications to contrast agents, radiofrequency ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs, or anticoagulants; 7. Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, angioplasty, or cerebrovascular 8.accident within 12 weeks prior to enrollment; 9.Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation by investigators; 10.Participation in other clinical trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate success rate of mitral isthmus ablation blockimmediately after the procedureBidirectional MI block was confirmed by the following criteria: (1) proximal-to-distal CS activation pattern when pacing at the left lateral ridge; (2) longer SA interval at the left lateral ridge when pacing at the distal CS compared to pacing at the proximal CS
Mitral isthmus block rate20 minutes after the procedureBidirectional MI block was confirmed by the following criteria: (1) proximal-to-distal CS activation pattern when pacing at the left lateral ridge; (2) longer SA interval at the left lateral ridge when pacing at the distal CS compared to pacing at the proximal CS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of atrial arrhythmias (tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation) over 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic drugs was followed up for 12 months.1 yearThe incidence of atrial arrhythmias (tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation) over 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic drugs was followed up for 12 months.
time of operationimmediately after the procedureTotal operating time,Ablation time,Mitral isthmus ablation time,Radiation time;
complication2 weeks after the procedureIncidence of pericardial tamponade, acute heart failure, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion; Puncture complications; Incidence of cerebral infarction and TIA; Death;

Contacts

Primary ContactZhiyu Ling, PhD
Lingzy1977@163.com+86 13512362075

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026