Skip to content

Predictive Value of PREMM5, MMRpredict, and Universal Tumor Screening for Lynch Syndrome in Vietnam

Predictive Value of the PREMM5, MMRpredict Models, and the Universal Tumor Screening Strategy for Lynch Syndrome in Vietnam

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06863038
Acronym
Predict_LS_VN
Enrollment
572
Registered
2025-03-07
Start date
2025-03-17
Completion date
2027-11-30
Last updated
2025-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer (CRC), Lynch Syndrome

Keywords

Lynch Syndrome, Universal Tumor Screening, Colorectal cancer, PREMM5, MMRpredict

Brief summary

This study evaluates the predictive value of PREMM5, MMRpredict models, and Universal Tumor Screening in detecting Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Vietnam. Vietnamese CRC patients (18-70 years) undergoing colonoscopy will be enrolled. Participants will complete a medical history questionnaire and provide blood samples for genetic testing. Tumor biopsy specimens will undergo Immunohistochemistry staining, BRAF V600E mutation, and MLH1 methylation analysis in case of loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression. Next-Generation Sequencing will detect germline MMR mutations, and biallelic somatic mutations will be analyzed if no germline mutations are found.

Detailed description

1. Background and Rationale Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Approximately 5-6% of CRC cases are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes, with Lynch Syndrome (LS) being the most common. LS results from germline mutations in the Mismatch Repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM), which lead to microsatellite instability (MSI) and an increased risk of CRC, endometrial, and other extracolonic malignancies. Despite its significance, LS remains underdiagnosed, particularly in Asian populations, due to the limitations of traditional screening criteria, such as Amsterdam II and the Revised Bethesda Guidelines, which have low sensitivity in identifying LS patients. In response, universal tumor-based screening using MSI testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR protein loss has been proposed as an effective alternative. Additionally, prediction models such as PREMM5 and MMRpredict have been developed to estimate LS risk based on clinical and family history. However, these models and tumor screening strategies have not been validated in the Vietnamese population. This study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of different screening approaches for LS in Vietnamese CRC patients, thereby optimizing genetic testing selection and early diagnosis. 2. Study Design and Setting This is a cross-sectional study conducted at two major hospitals in Vietnam: * University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City - GI Endoscopy Department * Nguyen Tri Phuong Hospital - GI Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Surgery Departments The study will enroll CRC patients aged 18-70 years who undergo colonoscopy with suspected tumors and are subsequently diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma. 3. Objectives Primary Objective: \- To assess the predictive value of PREMM5, MMRpredict, and Universal Tumor Screening Strategy in detecting Lynch Syndrome in CRC patients. Secondary Objectives: * To determine the prevalence of Lynch Syndrome based on germline MMR gene mutation testing. * To describe the clinical characteristics of Lynch Syndrome-Associated CRCs. * To describe the the endoscopic and histopathological features of Lynch Syndrome-Associated CRCs * To compare the diagnostic accuracy (AUC-ROC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) of different screening models and criteria, including Amsterdam II, Revised Bethesda Guidelines, PREMM5, MMRpredict, and Universal Tumor Screening. 4. Study Procedures Patient Enrollment & Sample Collection Eligible patients will: * Provide informed consent before participation. * Complete a medical history questionnaire assessing: * Family history of CRC and LS-related cancers. * Personal history of CRC, endometrial, and other extracolonic malignancies. * Clinical symptoms and lifestyle risk factors. * Provide a 2 mL blood sample for germline genetic testing. 5. Laboratory Analysis * Histopathological Evaluation: Tumor biopsy samples will be fixed in formalin, sectioned, and stained for Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) evaluation. * MMR Protein Expression: IHC will assess the loss of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 expression. * BRAF V600E Mutation & MLH1 Methylation: Tumors with MLH1/PMS2 loss will undergo further testing to determine sporadic vs. hereditary LS cases. * Germline MMR Mutation Testing: All the blood samples will undergo Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) to detect pathogenic germline MMR mutations. * Biallelic Somatic Mutation Analysis: If no germline mutations are identified in case of MLH1/PMS2 expression loss and no BRAF V600E mutation and no MLH1 methylation, tumor tissue sequencing will determine biallelic somatic inactivation. 6. Statistical Considerations Sample Size Calculation The sample size is calculated based on the estimated prevalence of LS at 2.9%, requiring at least 572 participants (including a 10% dropout rate) to achieve statistical power. 7. Statistical Analysis * Quantitative variables (e.g., age, tumor size) will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range. * Categorical variables (e.g., IHC results, BRAF V600E mutation) will be reported as percentages. * Diagnostic performance will be evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. * Comparison of screening models (Amsterdam II, Bethesda, PREMM5, MMRpredict, Universal Tumor Screening) will be based on their AUC-ROC values. * Significance level: p \< 0.05. 8. Ethical Considerations This study adheres to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and all participants will provide written informed consent. * Patient confidentiality will be ensured by de-identifying all study data. * All data will be retained for at least three years post-study completion. Data Quality and Monitoring * Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Guidelines will be followed for sample collection, DNA extraction, MSI/IHC testing, and genetic analysis. * Plan for Missing Data: Cases with missing or inconsistent data will be reviewed, and statistical methods such as multiple imputation will be used if necessary. * Registry Oversight & Compliance: The study will follow national biomedical research regulations and ensure compliance with international registry requirements (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov). 9. Study Duration and Expected Outcomes \- Study Duration: 24 months (March 2025 - March 2027). 10. Expected Outcomes: * Improved LS detection rates in Vietnamese CRC patients. * Validation of prediction models (PREMM5, MMRpredict) in the Vietnamese population. * Enhanced cost-effectiveness in LS screening and genetic testing selection. * Contribution to national screening guidelines for hereditary cancer syndromes. By refining LS screening strategies, this study will support early cancer detection, preventive interventions, and genetic counseling in Vietnam.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Gene Solutions
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 to 70 years * Provide informed consent to participate in the study * Undergo colonoscopy with endoscopic findings suspicious for CRC * Have biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma through colonoscopic biopsy

Exclusion criteria

* Active gastrointestinal bleeding * Currently using anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents * History of coagulation disorders or difficulty controlling bleeding * Incomplete colonoscopy to the cecum (excluding cases of tumor-induced obstruction)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predictive Value of PREMM5, MMRpredict, and Universal Tumor Screening for Lynch Syndrome in Colorectal Cancer PatientsAt study completion (Month 24). The primary outcome will be analyzed after all participants have completed sample collection, genetic testing, and data processing, expected within 24 months from study initiation.The study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of PREMM5, MMRpredict models, and Universal Tumor Screening (IHC testing) in detecting Lynch Syndrome (LS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The outcome will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) for each screening method compared to gold-standard germline MMR gene mutation testing (via Next-Generation Sequencing - NGS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of Lynch Syndrome in Colorectal Cancer PatientsAt study completion (Month 24)This outcome measures the proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients diagnosed with Lynch Syndrome (LS) based on germline MMR gene mutation testing (via Next-Generation Sequencing - NGS). The prevalence will be reported as a percentage of the total study population.
Clinical Characteristics of Lynch Syndrome-Associated CRCAt study completion (Month 24)This outcome describes the clinical characteristics of Lynch Syndrome-associated CRC vs. sporadic CRC. Key characteristics include age at CRC diagnosis, personal history of cancer and age of onset, family history of cancer and age at diagnosis, and clinical symptoms.
Endoscopic and histopathological features of Lynch Syndrome-Associated CRCAt study completion (Month 24)This outcome describes the endoscopic and histopathological features of Lynch Syndrome vs. sporadic CRC tumors. Key characteristics include tumor location, tumor quantity, and histopathological features.
Comparison of Screening Criteria and Prediction Models for Lynch SyndromeAt study completion (Month 24)This outcome compares the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC-ROC) of different LS screening methods, including Amsterdam II Criteria, Revised Bethesda Guidelines, PREMM5 Model, MMRpredict Model, and Universal Tumor Screening (IHC testing).

Countries

Vietnam

Contacts

Primary ContactDoan TN Nguyen, MD
nhadoannguyen@ump.edu.vn+84918206883

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026