Skip to content

OGTT at Home Using CGM vs at the Clinic

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test at Home With Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Standard Clinic-based Testing

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06862128
Acronym
OGTT-CGM
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-03-06
Start date
2025-06-11
Completion date
2040-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Pre-diabetes

Keywords

Pre-diabetes, Diabetes, Oral glucose tolerance test, Continuous glucose monitoring, Glucose

Brief summary

This randomized, crossover study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of a self-administered oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at home using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to a standard clinic-based OGTT. Participants with prediabetes will undergo both home-based and clinic-based OGTTs, with glucose levels measured via CGM and venous plasma glucose. The primary outcome is the correlation between CGM-based glucose values and standard OGTT results. Secondary outcomes include diagnostic agreement, metabolic hormone associations, and feasibility of home-based testing as a diagnostic tool for dysglycemia.

Detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and diagnostic utility of a self-administered oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at home using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to a standard clinic-based OGTT. Study Design Type: Randomized, crossover study Participants: 70 adults with prediabetes Intervention: Each participant will complete both a home-based OGTT with CGM and a clinic-based OGTT with venous plasma glucose measurement. Primary Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of the 2-hour CGM glucose value from a home OGTT compared with the 2-hour venous plasma glucose value from a clinic OGTT. Secondary Objectives To evaluate the lag-adjusted CGM timing and reproducibility across 2 home OGTTs. Methods Participants will be randomized into two groups: one starting with a clinic-based OGTT, the other with a home-based OGTT, followed by a crossover period. CGM will continuously monitor glucose responses, and standard venous plasma glucose measurements will serve as the reference method. Clinical Relevance A validated home-based OGTT using CGM could improve access to glucose tolerance testing, reduce patient burden, and enhance early detection of dysglycemia.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOGTT at home using CGM

OGTT at home using CGM

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOGTT at the clinic

OGTT at the clinic

Sponsors

Linkoeping University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV
Region Jönköping County
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Region Östergötland
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prediabetes indicated by any of the following values: * \- Fasting venous plasma glucose ≥5.6 but \<7.0 mmol/L * \- HbA1c ≥39 but \<48 mmol/mol * Access to a smart phone which is compatible with the CGM application and has working Bluetooth connectivity * Ability to read and respond to online instructions and questionnaires in Swedish.

Exclusion criteria

* T2D indicated by ≥2 of the following values, measured at different occasions or through different analyses: * \- Fasting venous plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L * \- Non-fasting venous plasma glucose value ≥11.1 mmol/L * \- HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol * Previous bariatric surgery e.g., gastric by-pass or gastric sleeve surgery * Body mass index \<20 kg/m2 * Body weight \<43 kg * Current pregnancy * Need of regular use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, acetaminophen or ascorbic acid supplements during the study period * Fear of needle sticks * Shift work during the study period * Involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or participant recruitment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of the 2-hour CGM glucose value during home-based OGTT compared with 2-hour venous plasma glucose during clinic-based OGTT2 hours after the start of the OGTTThe diagnostic accuracy of the 2-hour interstitial glucose measured by CGM during a home-based oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) will be evaluated against the 2-hour venous plasma glucose obtained during a clinic-based OGTT (reference standard) for the classification of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes. The 2-hour CGM value will be defined as the first CGM recording at or within 5 minutes after the 2-hour timepoint (i.e., between 120 and 125 minutes). Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen's kappa coefficient for overall classification agreement, each reported with 95% CIs. Systematic bias and limits of agreement between the two continuous glucose measurements will further be assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of the lag-adjusted 2-hour CGM glucose value during home-based OGTT compared with 2-hour venous plasma glucose during clinic-based OGTT0-20 minutes after the 2-hour timepoint of the OGTT (lag-adjusted)The diagnostic accuracy of a lag-adjusted CGM glucose value during a home-based oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) will be evaluated against the 2-hour venous plasma glucose during a clinic-based OGTT (reference standard) for the classification of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes. The lag-adjusted timepoint will be identified from the clinic-based OGTT as the CGM recording between 120 and 140 minutes showing the highest concordance with the 2-hour venous plasma glucose, assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and applied accordingly during the home-based OGTT. Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Cohen's kappa, each with 95% CIs, and Bland-Altman analysis will be used to assess systematic bias and limits of agreement.
Reproducibility of home-based OGTT using CGM2 hours and 2 hours plus 0-20 minutes lag-adjustment after the start of the OGTTReproducibility of the 2-hour CGM glucose value across the two home-based OGTTs will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and agreement in glycemic classification (normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes) will be assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa. Both the unadjusted and lag-adjusted 2-hour CGM values will be evaluated.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPeder af Geijerstam, MD, PhD

Linkoeping University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 6, 2026