Skip to content

Effect of PechaKucha (PK)Presentation Method on Nursing Students' Satisfaction Level With Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills and Education Method

Effect of PechaKucha (PK) Presentation Method on Nursing Students' Satisfaction Level With Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills and Education Method

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06862024
Enrollment
96
Registered
2025-03-06
Start date
2024-12-20
Completion date
2024-12-28
Last updated
2025-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PechaKucha Presentation, Traditional PowerPoint Presentation

Keywords

PechaKucha, Nursing students, breathing exercise, satisfaction,

Brief summary

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the PK presentation method on nursing students' deep breathing and cough exercise skills and the students' level of satisfaction with this method. Design: The sample of the study consisted of students studying in the 2nd year of the Nursing Department of a foundation university and taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course (n=96). Experimental (n=48) and control (n=48) groups were determined using a randomization program. While the students in the experimental group were taught deep breathing and cough exercises with the PK presentation method, the control group was trained with a traditional Power Point presentation. As data collection tools, student information form, deep breathing and cough exercise skill checklist and Visual Analog Scale measurement tool were used to determine the level of satisfaction with the training method. Keywords: PechaKucha, Nursing students, respiratory exercise, satisfaction

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDeep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills

Ability to apply deep breathing and cough exercise skills will be examined.

The level of satisfaction with the training provided will be determined with the PechaKucha presentation.

Sponsors

Eastern Mediterranean University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria Taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course for the first time attending the course on the day of the course

Exclusion criteria

* Students taking the course for the second time and those who did not attend the course on the day of the training were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction level of Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise Skills Training given with PechaKucha presentation method3 dayVisual Analog Scale A visual analog scale was used to measure students' satisfaction levels with the given training method, where students can score between 1 and 10..
Effect of PechaKucha presentation method on Deep Breathing and cough exercise skills3 dayThe steps of the Deep Breathing and Cough Exercise were prepared in accordance with the literature. Expert opinions were obtained for the scope validity of the prepared checklist according to the Davis technique. According to this technique, expert opinions are graded in 4 stages; 1-Not appropriate, 2-Item needs to be brought into appropriate form, 3-Appropriate but minor changes are required, 4-Very appropriate. The number of experts who gave 3 and 4 points to all items in the scale is divided by the total number of experts who received opinions and the Scope Validity Index (CVI) is obtained. In order for the items to be evaluated as sufficient in terms of scope validity, the Scope Validity Index must be above 0.80 \[15\]. In this technique, opinions are obtained from at least 3 and at most 20 experts. In this direction, expert opinions were obtained from 9 faculty members specialized in the field of Fundamentals of Nursing for the scope validity of the checklist.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026