Skip to content

Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Spinal Reflex Modulation

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Combined With Motor Training on Spinal Reflex Modulation in Healthy Young Adults

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06860464
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-03-06
Start date
2025-03-06
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Young Adults

Keywords

Remote ischemic conditioning, Spinal reflex modulation, H-reflex, Balance training

Brief summary

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a clinically feasible method that protects distant organs from severe injury through brief, sub lethal periods of ischemia followed by re-perfusion. Recent studies suggest that RIC, combined with training, improves muscle strength and balance in healthy adults and post-stroke survivors. While the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, RIC's neuroprotective effects - such as promoting angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and modulating glutamate and GABA synthesis - overlap with neuroplasticity processes. Evidence indicates that neuroplasticity from exercise training occurs not only in the cerebral cortex but also within the spinal cord, yet the role of spinal reflex mechanisms underlying the benefits of RIC remains under explored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate effects of RIC on spinal reflex modulation in healthy adults, both independently and combined with balance training.

Detailed description

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is an endogenous phenomenon that protects target organs from severe ischemic events by applying alternating cycles of brief, sublethal ischemia followed by reperfusion. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a more feasible, non-invasive method of delivering IC. It involves using a standard blood pressure cuff on either the arm or leg to induce brief periods of sublethal ischemia. Extensive evidence from both animal and human studies indicates that RIC provides neuroprotection through multifactorial mechanisms involving inflammatory, oxidative, excitotoxic, metabolic, vascular, and glial pathways. Additionally, several studies demonstrate the involvement of peripheral somatosensory, spinal cord, and autonomic pathways in RIC-induced neuroprotection. Prior research also shows that RIC enhances motor learning (balance performance) when paired with motor training in both young and older adults. While a wealth of research has shown that neuroplasticity in response to training occurs in cortical and spinal neural circuits, limited studies have explored the effects of RIC on spinal modulations in healthy adults. Notably, only one study has reported a reduction in Hoffman (H)-reflex amplitudes with RIC. Given the evidence of peripheral neuronal pathways involved in RIC and its positive impact on balance performance, it is plausible that RIC could lead to spinal reflex modulations and enhance balance improvements in healthy adults. These modulations may be further amplified when RIC is combined with balance training. The specific aims of this study are to determine whether 1) remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) combined with balance training modulates spinal reflex excitability, as reflected by H-reflex measures, and 2) to examine whether RIC combined with balance training leads to greater improvements in balance performance compared to sham conditioning combined with training in healthy adults. In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 30 healthy adults aged 18-40 years will undergo H-reflex testing of the dominant lower extremity and balance assessments at baseline (pre-training). Participants will then be randomized to receive either RIC or sham conditioning combined with a 5-day balance training program. RIC or sham conditioning will be delivered using cyclic inflation and deflation of a pressure cuff applied to the thigh of the dominant lower extremity following a standardized protocol. Balance training will consist of standing on a stability platform with the goal of maintaining the platform within a 5-degree horizontal range for 30 seconds across 15 trials per day for five consecutive days. All outcome measures, including H-reflex parameters (Hmax, maximal H-reflex amplitude, and Hmax/Mmax ratio) and balance performance, will be reassessed post-training following completion of the 5-day intervention. It is hypothesized that, compared to sham conditioning combined with balance training, RIC combined with balance training will result in greater reductions in H-reflex excitability and greater improvements in balance performance from baseline to post-training. This study will help clarify whether RIC induces alterations in spinal reflex modulations when applied independently or in combination with motor training, thereby reflecting neuroplasticity within the spinal cord in healthy young adults. These findings would deepen our understanding of the spinal mechanisms underlying the benefits of RIC and could accelerate its translation for individuals with neurological disorders

Interventions

See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. RIC is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the baseline assessment visit, and visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits.

See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the baseline assessment visit, and visits 2-6 are Sham plus training visits.

BEHAVIORALBalance training

All participants will undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level within the 5- degree horizontal range. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 2-6.

Sponsors

East Carolina University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants are masked to group assignment (RLIC vs. Sham conditioning)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy adults 18-40 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with cognitive deficits or communication problems * Individuals with impaired vision * Individuals with balance disorders such as vestibular disorders, etc. * Individuals who are pregnant * Individuals with known cardiorespiratory dysfunctions * Presence of lower extremity condition, injury, or surgery within last three months which could compromise training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in maximal H-reflex amplitude (Hmax)Baseline, Day 7The maximal (peak) H-reflex amplitude will be determined from the recruitment (stimulus-response) curve. The Hmax amplitude provides an estimate of the number or proportion of motor neurons (MNs) activated from the total MN pool, reflecting spinal reflex modulations and spinal neuroplasticity.
Change in Hmax/ Mmax RatioBaseline, Day 7The maximal H-reflex and maximal M-wave amplitudes will be determined from the recruitment curve procedure. Calculating the Hmax/Mmax ratio is a standardization method used to reduce variability in H-reflex amplitude across participants. This provides a better basis for comparison and a more reliable estimate of changes in spinal reflex modulations between participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Balance PerformanceBaseline, Day 7The average amount of time in seconds that a participant maintains the stability platform within ±5° of horizontal position during 15 trials of 30 seconds each. The total score will range between 0-30 seconds. Higher balance score indicates better balance performance. Greater average balance time indicates better balance performance.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSwati M Surkar, PT, PhD

East Carolina University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026