Skip to content

A 3-cohort Randomized Study Evaluating the Role of New Immunotherapeutic Agents and of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Frontline Therapy of Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A 3-cohort Randomized Study Evaluating the Role of New Immunotherapeutic Agents and of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Frontline Therapy of Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06860269
Acronym
GRAALL-2024
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2025-03-06
Start date
2025-05-06
Completion date
2035-03-15
Last updated
2026-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Brief summary

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) includes Ph-positive (Phpos) ALL, Ph-negative (Phneg) B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL and T-ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL), accounting for approximately 25, 50 and 25% of all cases, respectively. In younger adults, the results associated with standard therapy have markedly improved in these 3 groups, due to chemotherapy intensification in the BCP and T groups and addition of TKIs in the Phpos group, respectively. This led to reevaluate the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission, which is generally now indicated only in higher-risk patients, mostly defined as those with persistent high levels of minimal residual disease (MRD). Nevertheless, event-free survival (EFS) remains at 60-70% at 3 years, meaning there is still room for further improvements. Fortunately, new immunotherapies have been approved to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) BCP-ALL patients, including the anti-CD19 bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab (BLINA, Blincyto®, Amgen). 4 BLINA is also approved for the frontline treatment of patients with persistent high measurable residual disease (MRD) levels after initial therapy (IG/TR MRD ≥0.1% (≥1.10-3 )). BLINA has been also evaluated frontline in combination with TKI in the Phpos group leading to promising outcome improvements. Toxicities associated with these combined treatments seem to be limited and manageable. In the Phpos ALL subset, the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib (PONA, Iclusig®, Incyte) has also been evaluated frontline with promising results when compared to 1st or even 2nd generation TKI. In the T-ALL/LL subset, anti-CD38 antibodies, approved to treat patients with multiple myeloma, are potential drugs of interest. The anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab (ISA, Sarclisa®, Immunogen, Sanofi-Aventis) is currently approved to treat myeloma patients in 2nd line. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies suggest that CD38 is a relevant target in T-ALL and that isatuximab may be useful to eradicate residual disease in this subgroup of patients. Incorporation/combination of these new agents into frontline adult ALL therapy could allow reducing relapse incidence and prolonging survival in these patients, challenging the indication for HSCT in first complete remission (CR). The present GRAALL-2024 study is a prospective multicenter multi-country 3-cohort randomized clinical trial. The 3 cohorts are : GRAALL-2024/B : Phneg BCP-ALL GRAAPH-2024 : Phpos ALL GRAALL-2024/T : T-ALL/LL Eligible patients will be allocated to one on the 3 study cohorts during a common treatment prephase. The primary objective of the study is to improve the outcome of younger adults with ALL through optimal frontline incorporation of new antibody-based therapies, including BLINA in Phneg/pos BCP-ALL patients and ISA in T-ALL/LL patients, and to refine indication for allogeneic HSCT in first remission in Phneg/pos BCP-ALL patients.

Interventions

DRUGRandomization + Blinatumomab + chemotherapy

Rando 1 : BLINA will be given at 28 µg/day IVC from D1 to D28 for 2 to 4 cycles (first cycle starts with 9 µg/day for 7 days)

OTHERRandomization + Standard frontline T-ALL chemotherapy backbone

Rando 3 : standard of care

DRUGRandomization + Isatuximab + Standard frontline T-ALL chemotherapy backbone

Rando 3 : ISA will be given at 10 mg/kg IV for a maximum of 28 infusions starting at induction up to maintenance phase.

DRUGRandomization + Blinatumomab + Ponatinib + chemotherapy

Rando 2 : * PONA will be given at 45 mg/day PO during 2 cycles, 30 mg/day during 2 additional cycles, and 15 mg/day during maintenance phase or after alloHSCT * BLINA will be given at 28 µg/day IVC from D1 to D28 for 2 to 5 cycles (first cycle starts with 9 µg/day for 7 days). Patients allografted will receive two courses before transplant.

OTHERRandomization 1 + Allo HSCT

Rando 1 : standard of care - Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

OTHERRandomization 2 + Allo HSCT

Rando 2 : standard of care

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

3-cohort stratified multicenter multi-country prospective open-label randomized Phase III trial. In each cohort, participants will be randomized according to a 1:1 ratio (R1, R2 and R3). Additionnally a phase 2 single arm trial will be performed in SR patients of the Phneg BCP-ALL cohort. Of note, T-LL patients will be included but not randomized to receive ISA or not.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged 18 to 65 years old 2. Newly diagnosed ALL or T-LL according to the WHO criteria 3. Immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and/or FISH and molecular evaluation performed and allowing classifying the patient in one of the Phpos ALL, Phneg BCP-ALL or T-ALL/LL cohorts 4. Not previously treated except with corticosteroids and/or intrathecal therapy (prephase) 5. Eligible for allo-HSCT if Phpos ALL or Phneg BCP-ALL 6. ECOG performance status ≤2 7. Patient willing and able to understand the protocol requirements and comply with the treatment schedule, scheduled visits, electronic patient outcome reporting, exams and other requirements of the study 8. Patients has signed written inform consent 9. Willingness of women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) and male subjects whose sexual partners are WOCBP to use an effective form of contraception, i.e. methods with a failure rate of \<1% per year when used consistently and correctly, during the study and at least 6 months thereafter 10. Eligible for National Health Insurance (for French patients)

Exclusion criteria

Common

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalAt 5 yearsFor GRAAL-2024/B HR patients (phase 3)
Event-Free SurvivalAt 5 yearsFor GRAAL-2024/T patients (phase 3)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalAt 5 yearsin the T-ALL/LL cohorts
Event Free SurvivalAt 5 years
Relapse Free SurvivalAt 5 years
Hematological complete response rateAt 45 daysAfter induction
Measurable residual disease (MRD) response levelAt inclusion(IG/TR and BCR::ABL1 markers) at diagnosis
Measurable residual disease (MRD) response level - non graft patientsUp to 6 months(IG/TR and BCR::ABL1 markers) After each treatment cycle until maintenance (4 to 5 times)
Measurable residual disease (MRD) response level - graft patientsThrough study completion, approximately 5 years(IG/TR and BCR::ABL1 markers) At day 100 post-HSCT and every 3 months post HSCT for patients receiving allo-HSCT during maintenance up to 2 years
Early mortalityAt day 30
Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)At 5 years
Cumulative incidence of non relapse mortalityAt 5 years
Transplant-related mortality (TRM)At 5 yearsFor graft patients
Graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) incidenceAt 5 yearsFor graft patients
Number of patients who experience one or more Adverse Event (AEs) or Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)At 5 years
Rate of patients who experience one or more Adverse Event (AEs) or Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)At 5 years
Quality of life levelUntil 5 yearsAssessed with EQ5D 5L It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life. At each study visit
Incremental cost effectiveness and cost utility ratioAt 5 yearsDefined as the difference in total costs divided by the difference in survival and in quality adjusted life years

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTNicolas Boissel, MD PhD
nicolas.boissel@aphp.fr1 42 49 96 43
CONTACTJérôme Lambert, MD PhD
jerome.lambert@u-paris.fr0142499742

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026