Skip to content

CORE (Cognitive Optimization Through Rehabilitation and Education) Study

A Comparison of Two Interventions for Chronic Cognitive Difficulties After mTBI

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06859996
Acronym
CORE
Enrollment
354
Registered
2025-03-05
Start date
2025-10-27
Completion date
2029-09-01
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury; Concussion

Keywords

cognitive training, self-management, Veterans, concussion, psychoeducation, clinical trial

Brief summary

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects millions of individuals worldwide every year. It has long been thought that the vast majority of individuals who sustain a mTBI experience natural recovery with little or no intervention and return to baseline functioning within days to weeks of injury. However, recent large studies have demonstrated that a substantial number of individuals experience prolonged symptoms (e.g., cognitive impairment, headaches, affective symptoms). These symptoms, termed "Persistent Post-concussive Symptoms" (PPCS) are associated with significant functional disability and reduced quality of life (QOL) and can last for years post-injury. While PPCS can include affective, cognitive, and somatosensory/vestibular symptoms, objective and subjective cognitive symptoms - particularly in the domains of attention, memory, processing speed, and executive function - are among the most commonly reported following mTBI. There is currently no gold-standard intervention to address these symptoms. To address this gap, our research group developed a brief cognitive rehabilitation intervention called Tools for Rehabilitation and Cognitive Care (or On-TRACC). The goals of this clinical trial are: AIM 1: Compare the efficacy of On-TRACC to a psychoeducation control on reduction of self-reported cognitive post-concussive symptoms (Aim 1.1) and overall neurobehavioral post concussive symptoms and (Aim 1.2) following treatment and at 3-month follow-up (Aim 1.3) in a randomized clinical trial of community-dwelling adults with mTBI. AIM 2: Compare the efficacy of On-TRACC and psychoeducation on change in secondary outcomes, including cognitive self-efficacy, compensatory strategy use, self-management skills, and quality of life at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Exploratory AIM 3: Compare the efficacy of On-TRACC and psychoeducation on: primary and secondary outcomes at 6-months post-treatment and (Aim 3.1) explore whether engaging in On-TRACC leads to subsequent engagement in care by assessing whether there is a different level of participation in optional intervention booster sessions in the post-intervention period (Aim 3.2). All participants will: * Complete a series of assessments * Complete 6 treatment sessions via telehealth (either On-TRACC or psychoeducation) All participants will have the option of: * Attending weekly "Booster Sessions" between 3 and 6-months post-treatment * Completing neuropsychological assessments at 2 timepoints during the study

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTools for Rehabilitation and Cognitive Care (On-TRACC)

The On-TRACC intervention is administered one-on-one with a skilled clinician via telehealth and consists of an introductory session followed by 5 treatment sessions. Participants in the On-TRACC intervention will review various health and lifestyle factors that can affect cognitive functioning, learn and practice skills for managing cognitive and emotional symptoms, and develop personalized goals to support optimal cognitive functioning.

The Brain Health intervention is administered one-on-one with a skilled clinician via telehealth and consists of an introductory session followed by 5 treatment sessions. Participants in the Brain Health psychoeducation treatment will learn about various health and lifestyle factors that can affect brain health and cognitive functioning. In addition, they will be provided with resources and strategies for managing relevant factors and supporting optimal cognitive functioning.

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
CollaboratorFED
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 years of age * Evidence of self-reported mTBI sustained in adulthood at least 3 months prior to the date of study enrollment (clinical discretion allowed for mTBI in late adolescence) AND documentation of diagnosed or suspected mTBI as defined by American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) criteria in the medical record (e.g., on the problem list, has a diagnosis, encounter for a TBI, diagnosis via a TBI evaluation, or documented in a clinical note, etc). * Endorsement of at least moderate symptoms (score of 3 or higher) on at least one of the cognitive items (forgetfulness, poor concentration, taking longer to think) from the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptom Questionnaire. * Ability to read, speak and understand English enough to participate in healthcare in English without a translator. * Willingness to participate in audio-recorded treatment sessions. * Willingness to be randomized to treatment condition. * Willingness to use clinical video teleconferencing (CVT) for research appointments (including be on camera for treatment sessions). * Able to use and have access to a smart phone, tablet, or computer with internet access in private setting for treatment sessions. * Willingness to refrain from participation in any other clinical trial or interventional study while participating in this study

Exclusion criteria

* History of neurologic injury or illness other than mTBI that can affect cognitive functioning (e.g., any lifetime severe TBI \[Glasgow Coma Score (GCS)\<=8; loss of consciousness (LOC)\> 1 hour; posttraumatic amnesia (PTA)\>1 week\], seizure disorder, multiple sclerosis, neurodegenerative disorder). Any definitively diagnosed moderate TBI is exclusionary, but injuries that are in the mild to moderate range are eligible pending clinical discretion. If available records and/or self-reported information do not allow for a definitive determination of whether an injury is mild or moderate, then clinician discretion will be used to determine eligibility. * Alcohol abuse (operationalized as scoring 15 or more if male or 13 or more if female on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), or high-risk illicit drug use (as defined by modified Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medications and Substance Use/Misuse (TAPS) Tool subscale scores \> 2) in the past 3 months. Indication of alcohol/drug abuse or dependence in medical record is also sufficient to meet this

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Total ScorePre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentMeasure of post-concussive symptoms. Minimum value=0; maximum value=88; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Cognitive Subscale ScorePre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentCognitive post-concussive symptoms. Minimum value=0; maximum value=16; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Concerns Self-Efficacy ScalePre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentMeasure of perceived ability to effectively manage cognitive concerns and their impact on daily life. Minimum value=0; maximum value=60; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Compensatory Cognitive Strategies ScalePre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentMeasure of frequency of compensatory strategy use. Minimum value=0; maximum value=96; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Patient Global Impression of ChangePre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentMeasure of symptoms and overall quality of life. Minimum value=1; maximum value=7; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Quality of Life After Brain InjuryPre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentMeasure of health-related quality of life after brain injury. Minimum value=0; maximum value=100; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Self-Management Assessment ScalePre-treatment, Immediately post-treatment, 3-months post-treatmentMeasure of ability to self-manage health. Minimum value=10; maximum value=60; higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAnna Frauenheim, MPH
afrauen@uw.edu(206) 543-7731
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKathleen Pagulayan, PhD

University of Washington

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRhonda Williams, PhD

VA Puget Sound Health Care System

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 21, 2026