Osteoarthritis Thumbs, Rhizarthrosis, Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) Arthrosis
Conditions
Keywords
Osteoarthritis, Thumb, Rhizarthrosis, Trapezectomy, Arthroplasty
Brief summary
To date, there is no gold standard for the treatment of severe trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Despite the fact that new procedures have been described, techniques such hematoma distraction or ligament reconstruction tendon interposition are still valid non-implant options. The main hypothesis was that patients treated with LTRI technique would show superior clinical outcomes at one-year follow-up in terms of tip and key pinch and DASH scores in comparison with HDA technique. As secondary objectives, complication rates and surgical times were recorded.
Interventions
Hematoma distraction Artroplasty (HDA): A dorso-radial incision in the CMC joint was used in order to perform a trapezectomy. The thumb was displaced at its anatomical position (subtle opposition with 30º abduction) and fixed percutaneously with a 1.5mm K-Wire for three weeks along with a cast. This allowed to act the postoperative hematoma as an interposition between first-metacarpal and the scaphoid. Ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI): A complete removal of the trapezium bone with a radial-volar incision was made with posterior resection of the articular surface of the first metacarpal bone, and ligament transfer with a loop from hemi-tendonectomy of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) was used to cushion the joint while occupying the space of the resected bone following modified Weilby Garcia-Elias technique
A dorso-radial incision in the CMC joint was used in order to perform a trapezectomy. The thumb was displaced at its anatomical position (subtle opposition with 30º abduction) and fixed percutaneously with a 1.5mm K-Wire for three weeks along with a cast. This allowed to act the postoperative hematoma as an interposition between first-metacarpal and the scaphoid
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Before each intervention, the type of procedure to perform was determined using a balanced simple randomization computer system to allocate treatments provided by the surgical area supervisor to the surgeon in the operation room.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients who attended the hand unit's outpatient clinic at a regional trauma center with a diagnosis of grade III-IV TMC OA according to the Eaton-Littler radiological scale, who had previously failed conservative treatments (NSAIDs, splints, RHB, and corticosteroid injections) and desired surgical intervention with sufficient comprehension to participate in this study.
Exclusion criteria
Previous procedures on the same extremity distal to the elbow, central or peripheral neurological disease, and patient withdrawal.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional results between HDA and LTRI using the QuickDASH test | From enrollment to end of follow-up at 1 year | Functional results were collected preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively at the same facility, with a one-year follow-up. The score used to measure function and symptoms was the QuickDASH questionnaire. Patients responded to 11 statements, rating them from 1 to 5. Scores ranged from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). Clinical evaluation and data collection were performed by a level 2 specialist, according to Tang et al.'s criteria of the Hand Unit. |
| Clinical results between HDA and LTRI with the quantification of grip and tip pinch strenght with JAMAR dynanometer. | From enrollment to end of follow-up at 1 year | Grip and tip pinch strength were quantified using a BASELINE® hydraulic pinch gauge and dynamometer. Each patient completed three maximal pinch attempts, and the highest value was used for analysis. |
Countries
Spain