Skip to content

The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH

The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06857136
Acronym
GLINFANPH_2021
Enrollment
29
Registered
2025-03-04
Start date
2021-06-15
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Keywords

hydrocephalus, Normal pressure hydrocephalus, NPH, Glymphatic System, DTI-ALPS, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, ALPS-index

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the role of DTI-ALPS in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of NPH The main questions it aims to answer are: * Whether the glymphatic system (GS) is actually impaired in NPH * Whether DTI-ALPS index can predict the positive response to tap test (TT) and to ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) surgery. A healthy control group of patients (HC group) matched for age with the study group, will undergo MR with DTI-ALPS study

Detailed description

Enrolled patients followed a diagnostic-therapeutic pathway, consisting of the following steps: * t0: MR with DTI-ALPS study; * t1 (within 7 days from T0): clinical and neurosurgical assessment with NPH-specific rating scales (detailed below) before and after a lumbar TT, including measurements of opening pressure, drainage of 40-50 mL of CSF and collection of samples for neurodegenerative biomarkers (β-Amyloid 40, 42 total and P-Tau) quantification. An MR with DTI-ALPS study within 6 hours from TT; * t2 (within 3 months from T1): patients with a positive TT response (included responders, IR group) underwent VPS surgery, with CSF samples collected for the same neurodegenerative biomarkers (β-Amyloid 40, 42 total and P-Tau); * t3 (three months after surgery, IR group only): clinical and neurosurgical evaluation using NPH-specific rating scales to classify patients as improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to their preoperative condition; MR with DTI-ALPS study.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Suspected NPH patients according to the following: Inclusion Criteria: * clinical and radiological diagnosis of probable NPH according to existing guidelines * age of over 50 years

Exclusion criteria

* inability to undergo MR * diagnosis of any other neurological pathology, particularly neurodegenerative or neuroinflammatory * previous neurosurgical interventions on the brain of any type. * inability to undergo general anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison between study and control group4 yearsDifference in DTI ALPS index between NPH patients and healthy controls

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in response to tap test between NPH patients who responded and those who did not4 yearsDifference in DTI ALPS index between NPH who responded to tap test (and underwent to ventircolopetoneal shunt) and those who did not
Change in DTI ALPS index across treatment in NPH patients4 yearsDifference in DTI ALPS index in NPH patients between T0 (before TT), T1 (after TT) and T3 (after VP shunt)
Change in CSF degenerative biomarker concentrations4 yearsCSF degenerative biomarkers (total tau protein, p-181 tau protein, Aβ42 e Aβ40 protein) variation between T1, T2 and T3

Countries

Italy

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMorgan A Broggi, MD

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026