Skip to content

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06856356
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-03-04
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty, robot-assisted, alignment, satisfication, complication

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand the application value of the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System in assisting surgeons to accurately place prosthetic components in adult knee replacement surgery. It will also confirm its effectiveness and safety in clinical application.

Detailed description

The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand the application value of the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System in assisting surgeons to accurately place prosthetic components in adult knee replacement surgery. It will also confirm its effectiveness and safety in clinical application. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System improve the accuracy of prosthetic component placement in knee replacement surgery? Is the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System superior to traditional total knee replacement What medical problems do participants encounter when taking medication ABC? Researchers will compare the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System with traditional total knee replacement surgery (using a four-in-one osteotomy guide) to see if the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System is superior to traditional total knee replacement in terms of prosthesis three-dimensional position, force alignment, patient satisfaction, functional scores, complications, etc. Participants will: End-stage knee osteoarthritis patients receive total knee replacement with the Orthopedic Joint Surgery Navigation System or traditional total knee replacement surgery Visit the clinic for examination and testing every 3 months Record their imaging data, satisfaction, functional scores, complications, etc.

Interventions

Orthopedic surgeons perform total knee arthroplasty using an orthopedic joint surgery navigation system

Orthopedic surgeons perform total knee arthroplasty using a 4 in 1 osteotomy guide

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors are independent of the intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects voluntarily participate in the trial and sign the informed consent form; 2. Aged 18 to 80 years old (inclusive), regardless of gender; 3. Patients who need total knee replacement surgery; 4. Those who can communicate well with the researchers and comply with the trial requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are allergic to the drugs used in this trial or the implant materials; 2. Patients with immature bone development; 3. Patients with active infection; 4. Patients with neuropathy of the knee joint; 5. Patients with poor bone quality that is not conducive to prosthesis fixation; 6. Patients with general conditions or concomitant diseases that make it difficult for people to tolerate surgery; 7. Patients with insufficient quadriceps muscle strength; 8. Patients with insufficient skin coverage near the surgical site and intolerance to surgery; 9. Patients with severe femoral or tibial deformities and other severe deformities outside the joint; 10. Patients with metal implants in the joint surgical area that affect the execution of the surgical plan; 11. Pregnant or lactating women; 12. Patients with severe epilepsy or mental illness; 13. Patients with alcohol dependence or drug addiction; 14. Patients with severe coagulation disorders; 15. Patients who have participated in or are participating in other clinical trials within one month of enrollment; 16. Patients who are considered by the researchers to be unsuitable for participating in this clinical trial for other reasons. Those who meet any of the above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WOMAC scoreMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Use WOMAC scoring scale to assess the condition of the knee joint. The WOMAC score consists of 24 items with a total score of 100. The higher the score, the more severe the limitation of joint function.
Postoperative patient satisfactionMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Use a questionnaire to investigate patients' satisfaction with their knee joint after surgery
Forgotten Joint ScoresMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) tool designed to assess artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities following total knee arthroplasty.The total score is 100 points. The higher the score, the better the degree of forgetfulness of the artificial joint.
Knee Society ScoreMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24The KSS score was assessed using the American Knee Society scoring criteria.The full score is 100 points. The higher the score, the better the patient's knee function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ComplicationMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Record the patient's postoperative complications. For example, Persistent pain, fracture, superficial local infection, infection, thromboembolism.
Range of motionMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Physical examination to assess the knee's range of motion
SF-12Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24The health status of patients was assessed using the SF-12 health-related quality of life scale. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
visual analogue scale scoreMonth 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment。0 means no pain, 10 means the most painful, the higher the value, the higher the pain level of the patient
Hip-knee-ankle anglepostoperative Day 1-3Measuring Hip-knee-ankle angle in radiology

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
mLDFApreoperative Day 1-3, postoperative Day 1-3the lateral angle between the mechanical axis of the femur and the tangent of the distal end of the femoral prosthesis. The target value is 90°. \>90° is varus, and \<90° is valgus. Varus or valgus exceeding 3° is defined as femoral prosthesis position deviation.
Tibial posterior tilt angle (β angle):preoperative Day 1-3, postoperative Day 1-3on the standard lateral knee X-ray, the angle between the anatomical axis of the tibia and the lower surface of the tibial prosthesis.
Femoral prosthesis flexion angle (α angle)preoperative Day 1-3, postoperative Day 1-3on the standard lateral knee X-ray, the angle between the anatomical axis of the distal femur and the vertical line of the distal femoral prosthesis
mMPTApreoperative Day 1-3, postoperative Day 1-3medial angle between the mechanical axis of the tibia and the tangent of the tibial prosthesis, the target value is 90°, \<90° is varus, \>90° is valgus, and valgus exceeding 3° is defined as tibial prosthesis position deviation

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXianzuo Zhang, Ph.D
zhangxianzuo@foxmail.com+8618556533086
Backup ContactXianyue Shen, M.D
shenxianyue0616@163.com17843122928

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026