Skip to content

Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Repair of Congenital Inguinal Hernia

Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Repair of Congenital Inguinal Hernia: a Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06856304
Enrollment
109
Registered
2025-03-04
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2024-05-30
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia Repair, Pediatrics

Keywords

Laparoscopy, inguinal hernia, PIRS, sac disconnection, Narrowing of the internal ring

Brief summary

Background:comparison between percutaneous internal ring suturing vs Conventional Laparoscopic Repair of Congenital Inguinal Hernia in male patients. Methods : this is a prospective randomized study including 109 male patients with 120 CIHs Patients were randomly categorized into two groups. Group A were subjected to laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac and narrowing of the internal ring (IR). Group B underwent PIRS. The intended primary outcome was recurrence within 1 year, besides comparing the two techniques regarding operative time, efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcome, and postoperative complications.

Detailed description

Introduction Since the 1990s laparoscopy has gained popularity in the management of Congenital inguinal hernia (CIH). Several laparoscopic techniques have been described, including laparoscopic disconnection of the hernial sac with narrowing of the internal ring (IIR) which was described to mimic the open technique, and the extraperitoneal approach involves using various types of needles under laparoscopic guidance to percutaneously secure a suture circumferentially around the internal ring, thus obliterating the sac opening. This study compared the short-term outcome of percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) versus laparoscopic disconnection of the hernial sac with narrowing of the internal ring in children. Materials and Methods: This study included 109 male patients with 120 CIHs during the period from May 2022 to May 2024. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups. Group A were subjected to laparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac and narrowing of the internal ring (IR). Group B underwent PIRS. The intended primary outcome was recurrence within 1 year, besides comparing the two techniques regarding operative time, efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcome, and postoperative complications.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparoscopic disconnection of the hernia sac

disconnection of the hernial sac at the level of the internal ring using hook diathermy with sweeping the vas and the vessels away till completely separating them from the edges of the sac, then narrowing of the internal ring by appling a vicryl 3/0 suture between the ilipubic tract and the transverse arch of the transversus abdominus muscle

A single umbilical trocar was placed through a supraumbilical incision, and then the surgeon stood on the same side of the hernia. To choose the location for the needle puncture, the position of the IIR was assessed by pressing the inguinal region from the outside with the tip of a forceps. Under laparoscopic-guided vision, the previously prepared 18-gauge injection needle threaded with the monofilament suture was introduced into the abdominal wall through a skin puncture at the lateral edge of the internal ring. With the movements of the tip of the needle, the thread passed under the peritoneum, over the lateral half of the IIR. The thread was pushed through the barrel of the needle into the abdominal cavity and eventually made a loop. The needle was pulled out, leaving the loop of the thread inside the abdomen by hanging the loop on the endoscope this prevented the extraction of the loop with the needle and thus prevented repeating this step. Next, the thread loop was pulled out of t

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
6 Months to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male patients * age of 6 month to 5years * reduciable congenital inguinal hernia either unilateral or bilateral.

Exclusion criteria

* incarcerated CIH * recurrent CIH * patients with undescended testis, * patients with hydrocele, * patients with chronic comorbidity such as congenital heart disease and severe chest troubles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
operative timethe time estimated during the operationtime of the procedure estimated after trocars insertion and Inflation of the abdomen till deflation of the abdomen
intraoperative safetythe time estimated during the operationinjury of the vas deffernce , spermatic vessels , bleeding
Recurrence of the inguinal hernia1 yearpostoperative swelling in the inguinal region with gurgling sensation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cosmesis1 yearpostoperative scar

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026