Skip to content

Effects of Peptamen 1.6 in Malnourished Patients (or at Risk) With Pancreatic Neoplasia Undergoing Cephalic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD): A Mechanistic Study

Effects of Peptamen 1.6 in Malnourished Patients (or in Risk) With Pancreatic Neoplasia Undergoing Cephalic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD): A Study Mechanistic.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06852014
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-02-28
Start date
2025-05-29
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2025-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy, Pancreatic Cancer, Adult

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer, malnutrition, pancreaticoduodenectomy, oral nutritional supplement, gut microbiota, organoids

Brief summary

Malnutrition is a common challenge in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD), impacting postoperative recovery and overall prognosis. Nutritional support plays a crucial role in optimising metabolic, inflammatory, and digestive outcomes. This randomised, double-blind, crossover clinical trial aims to evaluate the effects of Peptamen 1.6, a hydrolysed whey protein-based enteral formula, compared to Resource HP/HC, a high-protein and high-calorie polymeric formula, in malnourished or at-risk patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing PD. The study comprises both in vivo and in vitro analyses. The in vivo component will assess the impact of Peptamen 1.6 on digestive tolerance, amino acid absorption, nutritional status, metabolic profile, inflammatory markers, and gut microbiota composition. The in vitro component will utilise human intestinal organoid models to explore how enteral nutrition formulations influence intestinal permeability and metabolism, with a focus on microbiota interactions. Primary outcomes include improvements in metabolic status, assessed through serum biomarkers (albumin, immune markers, intestinal permeability, and myosin profile), inflammatory status via peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and microbiota shifts in faecal samples. Additionally, adherence to treatment, digestive tolerance, and changes in body composition will be monitored using bioelectrical impedance, dynamometry, and functional mobility tests. By elucidating the mechanisms through which different enteral nutrition strategies influence clinical, physiological, and molecular parameters, this study aims to enhance personalised nutritional interventions for patients with pancreatic cancer. The findings could contribute to optimising nutritional support strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes following CPD.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary Supplement: Experimental Treatment with nutritional suplement A + nutritional suplement B

Intervention group will receive a nutritional formula A and, after 1-week washout period, will receive a nutritional formula B

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary Supplement: Dietary Supplement: Experimental Treatment with nutritional suplement B + nutritional suplement A

Intervention group will receive a nutritional formula B and, after 1-week washout period, will receive a nutritional formula A

Sponsors

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Patients will take Peptamen 1,6 and Resource HP/HC de forma secuencial pero con un orden predeterminado as assigned at randomization . For this purpose, identical formats will be used and neither the participant nor the researcher will know their content.

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, with a confirmed diagnosis of neoplasms of the periampullary region, pancreas, and duodenum, or pancreatic cancer, and who have undergone cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPD). * No prior neoadjuvant treatment (preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy): Patients must not have received neoadjuvant therapy as these treatments can affect metabolism, nutritional status, and gut microbiota, potentially interfering with the objectives of the study's nutritional intervention.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to sign informed consent: Informed consent is a mandatory requirement for study participation. Any patient unwilling to participate voluntarily will be excluded. * Patients who underwent surgery more than three months ago will be excluded, as the nutritional intervention must begin in the immediate postoperative period to adequately evaluate its impact on nutritional and metabolic status. * Presence of severe cardiac disease, nephropathy, or other severe comorbidities: Conditions such as severe cardiac disease, renal failure, or comorbidities that could induce malnutrition or impair the patient's ability to tolerate nutritional treatment will be

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to nutritional treatmentAt weeks 6 and 13Categorized based on the average daily consumption compared to the prescribed volume (200 ml per bottle): * Full content (200 ml/bottle) * 2/3 content (150 ml/bottle) * 1/2 content (100 ml/bottle) * 1/4 content (50 ml/bottle) Patients will self-report their average daily consumption (ml/day).
Natural food intakeAt weeks 6 and 13Patients will report their food intake over the previous week, categorized into quartiles (%) relative to: * Pre-illness consumption * Perceived normal intake for patients without supplementation * ALL -100% * 3/4 - 75% * HALF - 50% * ¼ - 25% * NONE - 0%
Tolerance to nutritional treatmentAt weeks 6 and 13Evaluated based on the frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, reflux, abdominal pain, flatulence, satiety, constipation, and stomach heaviness) within two hours of supplement consumption. Symptoms classified as: * Never * Rarely * Sometimes * Frequently * Always Bivariate analysis will classify tolerance as: * Good (no symptoms) * Poor (presence of any gastrointestinal symptoms)
Change in aminoacids: Ala, Glu, Asp, Pro, Phe, Leu/Ile, Val, Tyr, Met, Cit, Arg, Gly, and OrnAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Aminoacids measured in µmol/L
Change in IL-6 and TNF-alpha RNA expressionAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-6 and TNF-alpha measured from Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nutritional statusAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Evaluated using the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, both validated tools for classifying malnutrition severity. Patients will be categorized as at risk of malnutrition or having moderate or severe malnutrition based on results.
Change in Phase angle (PhA) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Phase angle (PhA) measured in degrees (º)
Change in total body water (TBW) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Total body water (TBW) measured in liters (l)
Change in extracellular water (ECW) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Extracellular water (ECW) measured in liters (l)
Change in intracellular water (ICW) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Intracellular water (ICW) measured in liters (l)
Change in Fat-free mass (FFM) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Fat-free mass (FFM) measured in kilograms (kg) and percentage (%)
Change in Fat mass (FM) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Fat mass (FM) measured in kilograms (kg) and percentage (%)
Change in Body cell mass (BCM) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Body cell mass (BCM) measured in kilograms (kg)
Change in appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) measured in kilograms (kg)
Change in skeletal muscle index (SMI) (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Skeletal muscle index (SMI) measured in kilogram per square meter (kg/m²)
Change in hydration (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Hydration measured in percentage (%)
Change in resistance (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Resistance measured in ohms (Ω)
Change in reactance (Vectorial Bioimpedance Analysis (BIVA))At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Reactance measured in ohms (Ω)
Handgrip dynamometryAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13* Device: Jamar hydraulic dynamometer * Measurement: Mean and maximum grip strength (kg) from three measurements Used to assess sarcopenia
Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13* Measures mobility and physical function * Procedure: Time (seconds) taken for the patient to: 1. Rise from a chair 2. Walk a short distance 3. Return to the chair
Change in total fat (Abdominal Ultrasound)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Total fat measured in centimeters (cm)
Change in superficial fat (Abdominal Ultrasound)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Superficial fat measured in centimeters (cm)
Change in preperitoneal fat (Abdominal Ultrasound)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Preperitoneal fat measured in centimeters (cm)
Change in muscle Ultrasound - AreaAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Area measured in square centimeters (cm²)
Change in muscle Ultrasound - CircumferenceAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Circumference measured in centimeters (cm)
Change in muscle Ultrasound - X-axis and Y-axisAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13X-axis and Y-axis measured in centimeters (cm)
Change in muscle Ultrasound - Adipose tissue of the rectus femoris of the quadricepsAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Adipose tissue of the rectus femoris of the quadriceps measured in centimeters (cm)
Change in GlucoseAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13glucose measured in mg/dl
Change in CholesterolAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Cholesterol measured in mg/dl
Change in TriglyceridesAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Triglycerides measured in mg/dl
Change in Uric acidAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Uric acid measured in mg/dl
Change in ASTAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13AST measured in units per litre (U/L)
Change in ALTAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13ALT measured in units per litre (U/L)
Change in insulinAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Insulin measured in units per mililitre (U/mL)
Change in albuminAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Albumin measured in grams per liter (g/l)
Change in C-reactive protein (CRP)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13C-reactive protein (CRP) measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Change in Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in zonulinAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Zonulin measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL)
Change in musclinAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Musclin measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Change in galectin-3At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Galectin-3 measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Change in myostatinAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Myostatin measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Change in Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) measured in nanomoles per microliter (nmol/μL)
Change in Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) measured in milliunits per milliliter (mU/mL)
Change in Superoxide dismutase (SOD)At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Superoxide dismutase (SOD) measured in inhibition rate %
Change in GLP-1At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13GLP-1 measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in GIPAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13GIP measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in PYYAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13PYY measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in IFN-gammaAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IFN-gamma measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in IL-2At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-2 measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in IL-4At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-4 measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in IL-6At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-6 measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in IL-10At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-10 measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in IL-12p70At baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-12p70 measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in GGTAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13GGT measured in units per litre (U/L)
Change in TNF-alphaAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13TNF-alpha measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in stool calprotectinAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Calprotectin measured in micrograms per gram (µg/g)
Change in IL-17AAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13IL-17A measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Change in ALPAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13ALP measured in units per litre (U/L)
Doses of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapyOnly at baselineMeasured in International Unit per day (IU/day)
Stool characteristicsAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13The number and type of stools will be assessed using the Kings Stool Chart, a standardized tool that classifies stool consistency and form to evaluate digestive function alterations. * Number of bowel movements: A numerical field to record the daily count. * Type of bowel movements: A categorical field with options ranging from 1 to 7, based on the King's Stool Chart. * Variability in type: A binary field (0 = No, 1 = Yes) to indicate whether there is variation.
Symptoms of anxiety and depressionAt baseline and in weeks 6, 7, and 13Measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which consists of two subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADSA) and HADS-Depression (HADSD) Interpretation of scores: * 0-7: Normal. * 8-10: Suggests the presence of mood disorders. * ≥11: Indicates a probable mood disorder.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactGabriel Olveira Fuster, MD, PhD
gabrielm.olveira.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es951290343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026