Skip to content

Effects of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave and Kinesio Taping Treatments in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Effects of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave and Kinesio Taping Treatments on Quality of Life, Hand Function and Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area Measured by Ultrasonography in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06850779
Enrollment
76
Registered
2025-02-27
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-03-30
Last updated
2025-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, kinesio taping

Brief summary

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a common upper extremity nerve compression syndrome that causes significant economic and social burden to affected individuals. Although the severity may vary among patients, symptoms such as night pain, transient numbness, tingling, constant pain, muscle weakness, and sleep disturbance may be observed. The treatment of CTS can be grouped as nonsurgical and surgical treatments. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of treatment with sound waves and a healing method called extracorporeal shock wave therapy and a therapeutic flexible tape called kinesiology taping on pain, grip strength, quality of life, depression symptoms, hand functions, and ultrasonographic median nerve cross-sectional area in patients with CTS.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common nerve entrapment syndrome, typically affecting the dominant extremity. Symptoms often become more pronounced at night, and may include numbness, tingling, electric shock sensations, pain, and other related symptoms. Diagnosis can be made based on patient history, physical examination, electrodiagnostic tests, and ultrasonography. Treatment options include splinting, exercise therapy, physical therapy modalities, various injections, and surgical methods. In our study, we compared the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and kinesiology taping (KT) on carpal tunnel syndrome. The study involved four randomized groups: Group 1 received both ESWT and KT, Group 2 received only ESWT, Group 3 received only KT, and Group 4 received exercise therapy alone. Evaluations were conducted using the Visual Analog Scale, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, Nottingham Health Profile, grip strength measurements, and median nerve cross-sectional area via ultrasonography. Evaluations were performed three times: before treatment, at week 3, and at week 6.

Interventions

Radial ESWT (Vibrolith OrthoⓇ) was applied to the wrist as 1000 pulses with a frequency of 5 Hz and a power of 1.5 bar. The treatment was applied once a week for a total of 3 sessions.

KT was prepared as 2 pieces of 2.5 cm I band and 1 piece of 5 cm I band. It was applied with a maximum of 50% tension (without tension on the ends) while the wrist was in 30 degrees of extension, forearm supination and elbow extension. The treatment was applied once a week for a total of 3 sessions.

OTHERExercise

Median nerve gliding exercises were given to the 4th group during the follow-up period. The same exercises were given to the other groups.

Sponsors

Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mild to moderate unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electroneuromyography (ENMG) * Patients over 18 years of age * Symptom duration of at least 3 months * Those who have not received any medical treatment other than analgesics in the last 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) * Severe CTS detected by ENMG * Operated CTS * Corticosteroid injection within the last 3 months * History of peripheral nerve damage * Secondary CTS causes (thyroid dysfunction, connective tissue diseases) * Cervical disc herniation * DeQuervain tenosynovitis, trigger finger, Dupuytren contracture * Inflammatory disorder * Bleeding disorder * Pregnancy * Malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain level before treatment, 3rd week and 6th week after treatmentFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekPain level will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale. (minimum: 0, maximum: 100 mm)
Assessment of symptom severity and functionalityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekThe Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) questionnaire was used to assess symptom severity and functionality. It includes 2 subgroups: Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS). Symptom severity is assessed with 11 questions, and functional status is assessed with 8 questions. Each question is scored from low to high, 1 to 5. As the total score increases, deterioration increases.
Assessment of median nerve cross sectional area by ultrasonographyFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekThe median nerve cross-sectional area was measured by tracing just proximal to the carpal tunnel entrance with the wrist resting on a table in a neutral position. The carpal tunnel entrance was identified by detecting the proximal side of the transverse carpal ligament. The distal radioulnar joint was also observed at this level.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of quality of lifeFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekThe Nottingham Health Profile was used.As a general health status questionnaire, it provides a brief indication of a patient's perceived emotional, social and physical health and is designed for use in the general population. It is concerned with the individual's health status and includes energy levels, pain, emotional responses, sleep, social isolation and physical abilities. The energy levels domain consists of 3 items, pain 8 items, emotional responses 9 items, sleep and social isolation domains 5 items each and physical abilities domain 8 items. Each item requires a yes or no response. The patient's score is calculated out of a total of 600 points. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life.
Assessment of grip strength and lateral pinch strengthFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekA hydraulic hand dynamometer was used to assess grip strength, and a hydraulic pinchmeter was used to assess lateral pinch strength. Measurements were made using the 2nd level resistance (3.75 cm) with the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion and the forearm and wrist in a neutral position. Patients were asked to squeeze with maximum force, measurements were made three times, and the average result was recorded in kilograms. For lateral pinch (LP), the pinchmeter was pressed with the distal middle of the thumb, and the lateral part of the second phalanx of the index finger was used to support the lower part.
Assessment of depressionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekBeck Depression Inventory was used for depression assessment. It consists of 21 items with four precursors scored between 0 and 3. Patients are asked to mark the item that best suits their mood in the past week. As the score increases, it is thought that the depressive state is more severe. The total score is scored as 0-9 = Minimal, 10-16 = mild, 17-29 = moderate, 30-63 = severe.
Assessment of functionalityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekDuruöz Hand Index was used for functional assessment. This questionnaire contains 18 questions on hand activities. It consists of five areas. There are eight questions on kitchen activities, two questions on dressing, two questions on personal hygiene, two questions on office work and four questions on other activities. The patient selects one of the answers for each question on a scale of one to five. The scores given for each question are added to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate more severe hand disability.
Assessment of neuropathic painFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3rd week and 6th weekDouleur Neuropathique 4 Questions was used to assessment of neuropathic pain. The DN4 questionnaire consists of 10 items. The first 7 items are related to pain characteristics and sensation, while the remaining 3 items are related to examination. For each item, a score of 1 is given if the answer is yes and a score of 0 if the answer is no. If the total number of yes answers from the 10 items is calculated as 4 or more, the patient is defined as having neuropathic pain.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026