Skip to content

To Study the Efficacy & Safety of Oral NA-921 (Bionetide) in Girls and Women with Rett Syndrome

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/ Phase 3 Study of NA-921 (Bionetide) for the Treatment of Girls and Women with Rett Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06849973
Enrollment
187
Registered
2025-02-27
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2025-01-28
Last updated
2025-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rett Syndrome

Keywords

Rett syndrome, Mental Retardation, X-Linked, Genetic Diseases, X-Linked

Brief summary

To study the efficacy & safety of oral Bionetide versus placebo in girls and women with Rett syndrome

Detailed description

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study of NA-921 (Bionetide) for the Treatment of Girls and Women with Rett Syndrome Primary Objective • To investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with oral NA-921 (Bionetide) versus placebo in girls and women with Rett syndrome Key Secondary Objective • To investigate the efficacy of treatment with oral NA-921 (Bionetide) versus placebo on ability to communicate in girls and women with Rett syndrome Co-Primary Endpoints * Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) total score - Change from Baseline to Week 12 * Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 12 Key Secondary Endpoint Change from Baseline to Week 12 in: • Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist- Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social)

Interventions

DRUGDrug: Bionetide

NA-921 (Bionetide) solution administered based on the subject's weight at Baseline, twice daily for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

NA-921 (Bionetide) placebo solution administered based on the subject's weight at Baseline, twice daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Biomed Industries, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
5 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female subjects 5 to 20 years of age, inclusive, at Screening * Body weight ≥12 kg at Screening * Can swallow the study medication provided as a liquid solution or can take it by gastrostomy tube * Has classic/typical Rett syndrome (RTT) * Has a documented disease-causing mutation in the MECP2 gene * Has a stable pattern of seizures, or has had no seizures, within 8 weeks of Screening * Subjects of childbearing potential must abstain from sexual activity for the duration of the study and for at least 30 days thereafter or must agree to use acceptable methods of contraception. Subject must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. * The subject's caregiver is English-speaking and has sufficient language skills to complete the caregiver assessments * Subject and caregiver(s) must reside at a location to which study drug can be delivered and have been at their present residence for at least 3 months prior to Screening

Exclusion criteria

: * Has been treated with insulin within 12 weeks of Baseline * Has current clinically significant cardiovascular, endocrine (such as hypo- or hyperthyroidism, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, or uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus), renal, hepatic, respiratory or gastrointestinal disease (such as celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease) or has major surgery planned during the study * Has a history of, or current, cerebrovascular disease or brain trauma * Has significant, uncorrected visual or uncorrected hearing impairment * Has a history of, or current, malignancy * Has a known history or symptoms of long QT syndrome Additional inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score - Change From Baseline to Week 12Baseline and Week 12The RSBQ is a 45-item caregiver-completed rating scale that includes 45 items, 39 of them grouped into 8 subscales, whose ratings reflect the severity and frequency of symptoms. Items are rated as 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat or sometimes true), or 2 (very true). The 8 subscales are general mood, breathing problems, hand behavior, face movements, body rocking/expressionless face, night-time behaviors, fear/anxiety, and walking/standing. Scores for item 31 are reversed in the calculation of the total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 90 and is calculated as the sum of the item scores. Higher scores mean worse behavior.
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 1212 Weeks Treatment DurationTo rate how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state, a 7-point scale is used from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist - Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social)12 Weeks Treatment DurationStandardized screening scale for assessing communication and pre-linguistic skills in young children 12-24 months and can be used with older children with developmental delay. The CSBS-DP includes a suite of three separate measures: The Infant-Toddler Checklist, a follow-up Caregiver Questionnaire and a Behavior Sample. In this study only the Infant-Toddler (CSBS-DP-IT) Checklist was used. The CSBS-DP-IT Checklist is a 24-item rating scale and each item is scored using a three-level rating of frequency: not yet, sometimes and often. The CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite score the range was 0 to 26 and a higher score represented a worse outcome. Three composite scores can be calculated: 1) Social Composite; 2) Speech Composite; 3) Symbolic Composite.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC)12 Weeks Treatment DurationClinical assessment of the subject's ability to communicate their choices or preferences, which can include the use of nonverbal means such as eye contact or gestures. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

Countries

Australia, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026