Skip to content

Manual T-piece Versus Ventilator Positive Pressure Ventilation During Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Neonates

A Cluster Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial of Manual T-piece Versus Ventilator Positive Pressure Ventilation During Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Neonates: The MVP Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06849596
Acronym
MVP
Enrollment
780
Registered
2025-02-27
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2029-01-01
Last updated
2026-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apnea Neonatal, Neonatal Resuscitation

Keywords

Premature Infant, Preterm Neonates, Oxygen, Lung Injury, Respiration, Artificial, Resuscitation, Ventilator, Mechanical

Brief summary

Many extremely premature infants require immediate help with breathing after birth. Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) using a device called a T-piece resuscitator is a common method. PPV is needed to establish proper lung function, improve gas exchange, and encourage the infant to breathe spontaneously. However, T-piece resuscitators have limitations, like a lack of visual feedback and variable settings, which may result in reduced effectiveness of PPV. Improving PPV effectiveness may reduce the need for more invasive procedures, such as intubation, which pose an increased risk of complications and death for these fragile infants. A novel approach, that may overcome the above limitations and deliver PPV with precise settings through a nasal mask, is to use a ventilator to deliver PPV (V-PPV) using a respiratory mode called nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). While NIPPV is commonly used in neonatal intensive care units to support breathing in premature infants, the impact of V-PPV use during immediate post-birth stabilization needs to be studied. Preliminary data from our recent single-center study confirmed the feasibility of using V-PPV for resuscitation of extremely premature babies and indicated its potential superiority with a 28% decrease in the need for intubation compared to historical use of T-piece. This promising innovation may enhance outcomes for these vulnerable infants by refining the way we provide respiratory support in their critical first moments. The research objective is to compare the clinical outcomes of extremely premature infants receiving manual T-piece versus V-PPV during immediate post-birth stabilization. The primary aim is to evaluate the impact of V-PPV on major health complications or death. This study seeks to provide insights into improving the care and outcomes of these infants during a critical stage of transition from fetus to newborn.

Interventions

DEVICEVentilator derived positive pressure ventilation - V-PPV

The clinical team will determine the need for PPV, as per local practice and Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Each site will be previously randomized to their method of providing PPV for preterm neonates during the first 10 minutes after birth. Ventilator delivered positive pressure ventilation (V-PPV) using a nasal interface will be delivered to the infant in the resuscitation room.

DEVICET-piece resuscitator (TPR)

The clinical team will determine the need for PPV, as per local practice and Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Each site will be previously randomized to their method of providing PPV for preterm neonates during the first 10 minutes after birth. PPV will be provided with a T-piece resuscitator (Neopuff, Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare) connected to an appropriately sized face-mask.

Sponsors

Michelle Baczynski
Lead SponsorOTHER
Royal Alexandra Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Foothills Medical Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
McMaster Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Justine's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
CollaboratorOTHER
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The DSMB will assess intervention compliance and mortality rates, masked to the group allocation. The trial statistician will be blinded to group allocations.

Intervention model description

This study will be a cluster-crossover, unmasked randomized control trial (RCT) comparing the clinical effectiveness of two existing methods for providing PPV to preterm neonates born 25+0 to 28+6 weeks gestational age during initial resuscitation after birth.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Weeks to 29 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * GA 25+0 to 28+6 weeks using the best available obstetrical estimate * Designated to receive full resuscitation, i.e., not pre-determined to receive only comfort care * Received PPV as determined by the resuscitation team during the first 10 minutes of birth

Exclusion criteria

* Outborn birth status * Resuscitation performed in unforeseen circumstances outside typical delivery room (e.g., emergency department, antenatal ward) * Known major congenital or chromosomal anomaly * Established spontaneous respiration without receipt of PPV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of pre-discharge mortalityFrom enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age)Death in NICU
Major neuro-injuryFrom enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age)Defined as IVH ≥grade 3, cerebellar hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia.
Moderate-severe BPDAt 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.Defined as 2 L/min nasal cannula or other forms of non-invasive ventilation support or invasive mechanical ventilation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Components of the primary outcomeFrom enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age)Pre-discharge mortality, major neuro-injury or moderate-severe BPD
Frequency of receipt of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation measuresFrom enrollment to 1 hour post intervention.Chest compressions or epinephrine administration for the purpose of resuscitation.
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation during NICU admissionFrom enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age)Total number of days on invasive mechanical ventilation
Discharge on home oxygenFrom enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age)Discharge from the NICU requiring oxygen support at home
Other relevant key prematurity related adverse outcomeFrom enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age)Necrotizing enterocolitis ≥ stage 2a, retinopathy of prematurity needing treatment.

Countries

Canada, Denmark, United States

Contacts

CONTACTThaiani Wulff, BSc
thaiani.wulff@sinaihealth.ca1-416-586-4800.
CONTACTLaura Thomas, MSc
laura.thomas@sinaihealth.ca416-586-4800
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichelle Baczynski, MSc

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026