Skip to content

Interdental Hygiene Methods in Young Adults

Effectiveness of Different Methods of Interdental Space Hygiene in Daily Practice Among Young Adults: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06848790
Acronym
HIJA
Enrollment
51
Registered
2025-02-27
Start date
2025-09-17
Completion date
2026-04-13
Last updated
2026-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Microbiota-related Disease, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

Oral health, Interdental hygiene, Periodontal disease prevention, Interdental microbiota, Preventive care

Brief summary

Oral health is essential for overall well-being and systemic health. A key factor in preserving this health is maintaining the balance of the interdental microbiota, which involves regulating the quantity of pathogenic bacteria in interdental spaces (IS). These IS represent a unique ecological niche where the body has limited specific defense mechanisms, making them vulnerable to infections. In adults, the colonization of interdental spaces by pathogenic bacteria increases the risk of periodontal diseases, which are themselves associated with non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and certain types of cancer. Preventing interdental microbiota dysbiosis from a young age is therefore a priority to maintain quality oral health and contribute to good systemic health throughout life. However, conventional brushing techniques cover only accessible tooth surfaces and cannot reach the interdental spaces. Currently, the use of interdental brushes (IDBs) is recognized as the most effective method for interdental hygiene. There are various types of IDBs, differing in several aspects that influence their effectiveness and usability. The main differences relate to their shape, size, and calibration using an interdental probe or not, allowing adaptation to different interdental space sizes. To date, only one study has demonstrated the effectiveness of daily calibrated interdental brush use in reducing dysbiosis and interdental inflammation among young adults. However, no research has yet been conducted to compare the effectiveness of the various types of IDBs available on the market (calibrated versus non-calibrated).

Interventions

PROCEDURECalibrated interdental brush

participants will use calibrated interdental brushes

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Person between 18 and 30 years old * Person who has given free, informed, express written consent * Person affiliated to a French social security system * Person living or working in Lyon or the Lyon conurbation served by public transport (TCL)

Exclusion criteria

* Person with a smoking addiction * Person participating in another study related to oral hygiene * Patients at high risk of infective endocarditis * Person with chronic pathologies * Person having taken antibiotic treatment during the month preceding the start of the study * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman * Persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision * People receiving psychiatric care * Persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research * Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship) * Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme * Person with fewer than 20 natural teeth * Person performing interdental hygiene and/or daily mouthwashes. * Person wearing orthodontic appliance * Person with periodontal disease (stage ≥ II periodontal lesions according to the Chicago 2017 classification (i.e. PD ≥ 4 mm, and/or CAL ≥ 4 mm) and/or generalized (\>30% of sites )), active caries or during dental care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interdental bleeding at month 3 (in percentage)Baseline (T0), 3 months after baseline (T3)Comparison of interdental inflammation (interdental bleeding) following the daily use of calibrated versus non-calibrated interdental brushes at month 3 (T3, expressed as a percentage and assessed at four sites per tooth following probing with a periodontal probe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composition of the Interdental microbiome (diversity and total bacteria count)Baseline (T0)Identification of the composition of the interdental microbiome in healthy young adults using sequencing techniques at T0, in four standardized sites (between teeth 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, and 45-46). If the specified teeth are missing, exhibit pathologies, or have diastemas preventing interdental cleaning, the sample will be taken from the nearest healthy mesial interdental space.
Periodontal health analysisBaseline (T0), 1 week later (T1), 1 month after baseline (T2), 3 months after baseline (T3)Comparison of periodontal for all participant's teeth (plaque index, gingival index, interdental inflammation, pocket depth and loss of clinical attachment) before (T0), 1 week after baseline (T1), 1 month after baseline (T2) and 3 months after baseline (T3) following the daily use of calibrated versus non-calibrated interdental brushes
Periodontal health analysis - salivary pHBaseline (T0), 1 week later (T1), 1 month after baseline (T2), 3 months after baseline (T3)Comparison of periodontal for all participant's teeth (salivary pH) before (T0), 1 week after baseline (T1), 1 month after baseline (T2) and 3 months after baseline (T3) following the daily use of calibrated versus non-calibrated interdental brushes
Interdental microbiota at T3 (diversity and total bacteria count)Baseline (T0), 3 months after baseline (T3)Comparison of the composition of the interdental microbiome in healthy young adults using sequencing techniques after 3 months of calibrated versus non calibrated interdental brushed, in four standardized sites (between teeth 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, and 45-46). If the specified teeth are missing, exhibit pathologies, or have diastemas preventing interdental cleaning, the sample will be taken from the nearest healthy mesial interdental space.
Daily use acceptability of interdental brushes1 week after baseline (T1), 1 month after baseline (T2), 3 months after baseline (T3)Evaluation and comparison of the acceptability and ease of integration (by TFA questionnaire) of daily use of calibrated versus non-calibrated interdental brushes, 1 week after baseline (T1), 1 month after baseline (T2) and 3 months after baseline (T3)

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStéphane VIENNOT

HCL

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 25, 2026