Skip to content

INNUPREC (Nutrigenetic Intervention for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease)

Effect of Nutrigenetic Intervention on Cardiovascular Biomarkers, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Capacity in Subjects with Abdominal Obesity

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06847243
Acronym
INNUPREC
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-02-26
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2025-09-01
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Obesity

Keywords

Abdominal obesity, Nutrigenetic intervention, Cardiometabolic biomarkers

Brief summary

Background: Abdominal obesity (AO) is a multifactorial disease that affects 81.6% of the Mexican population; it is characterized by the excessive accumulation of adipose tissue in abdominal region. Scientific evidence suggest that regional fat distribution plays a critical role in the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The main processes involved in the increased risk of developing CVD in the presence of AO are alterations in insulin signaling, dyslipidemias, atherosclerosis, inflammation, and oxidative damage. On the last years has been reported genetic variations associated with AO and dyslipidemia. In addition, interactions have been found between these genetic variants and diet that may be influencing a differential response in metabolic, molecular, and phenotypic processes, which favor the development of CVD. Objective: Evaluate the effect of nutrigenetic intervention on cardiovascular biomarkers, oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in subjects with abdominal obesity. Materials and methods: The present study is a simple randomized clinical trial. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups of intervention; Control group and Nutrigenetic group during a 2-month follow-up period. Anthropometric, dietary evaluation and biochemical markers assessments will be monitored at baseline, at 4 weeks (mid-intervention), and at 8 weeks (end of intervention). The dietary evaluation was analyzed by Nutritionist Pro software. Body composition was evaluated by electrical bioimpedance (InBody 370). All biochemical determinations were analyzed by dry chemistry (Vitros 350) and cardiometabolic markers by colorimetric immunoassay technology. Infrastructure: Institute of Translational Nutrigenomics and Nutrigenomics, University Center for Health Sciences, University of Guadalajara.

Detailed description

A total of 60 subjects will be invited to enroll in a clinical trial of nutrigenetic or control intervention. Prior to randomization and the start of the intervention, all subjects will be scheduled for a first appointment where their medical history will be taken and a blood sample will be taken for DNA extraction and their genetic profile will be performed (including 21 SNV (single nucleotide variation) involved in cardiometabolic disorders). The assignment to the intervention group will be done through a random permuted block assignment. In the case of the subjects of the nutrigenetic intervention group, with the help of an algorithm designed for the purposes of this study, their genetic profile of the variants of interest will be entered, in order to determine the dietary pattern to which they have the greatest affinity. Once this data is available, they will be given their eating plan. Regarding the control group, the characteristics of their menu will adhere to what is established in a correct diet and the recommendations of the American Heart Association. This clinical trial will consist in a 8-week intervention with recurrent visits every 4 weeks. Subjects will be required to follow the dietary plan provided in a menu produced and edited by our research group. In every visit, all subjects will undergo a body composition analysis as well as blood tests that include: total cell count, glucose and lipid homeostasis, serum oxidative and antioxidant markers. In total, they will be evaluated anthropometrically and biochemically on 3 occasions, at baseline, 1 month and 2 months (final). This study proposes three distinct but closely related approaches to gain a better understanding of nutrigenetics and its impact on precision nutrition. * To compare the effect and impact of personalized nutritional interventions on nutritional diets with general recommendations. * See the impact of a personalized diet in improving parameters involved in the development of cardiovascular diseases * Develop new personalized nutritional treatment strategies for subjects with chronic diseases Once the project is finished, new research strategies will be proposed for future studies, seeking to have an evaluation beyond the anthropometric and biochemical, such as microbiota or gene regulation. In addition to this, the application of the knowledge generated in the project to the health care of patients with obesity who may come to our service in the future will be encouraged. Finally, the knowledge generated will be disseminated in our institutional community, which would increase the impact and significance of the project. In summary, the impact of this study is divided into the following points: * Design of new strategys as nutrigenetic intervention´s for the treatment and prevention metabolic disease such as obesity and cardiovascular * Identification of some cardiovascular biomarkers relevant to the treatment of abdominal obesity and its comorbidities * Useful information on gene-nutrient interaction for the public and private sector in the field of genetic testing * Study population benefited from the results of the intervention and the information of their genetic and biochemical profiles

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNutrigenetic diet according the genetic test

Subjects within the nutrigenetic intervention group will be provided with a dietary plan according to nutrient intake characteristics by alghoritm genetic afinity.

Subjects within the control intervention group will be provided with a dietary plan according to general nutrient recommendation by the AHA (American Hearth association) and national cholesterol education program

Sponsors

University of Guadalajara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized parallel clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 30-65 years of age * Subjects who agree to participate in the study and all signed informed consent * Women with a waist circumference ≥ 88 cm and men ≥ 102 cm according to NCEP/ATPIII.

Exclusion criteria

* Currently consuming any of the following drugs: NSAIDs, anticoagulants, hypoglycemic, or hypolipemic drugs * Diagnosed autoimmune diseases * Diagnosed cancer * Pregnancy and breastfeeding * Subjects who have undergone a dietary intervention at the time or up to 3 months prior * Subjects who wish to abandon the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Waist Circumference between nutrigenetic and control groupAt baseline, first month and second month (final)Waist circumference is used as a diagnostic criterion for abdominal obesity, which is why it is the main change to be evaluated among our study groups. Waist circumference will be measure at the narrowest point between the edge of the inner rib and the iliac crest, with the participant in an abducted and relaxed position, after expiration using a Lufkin Executive® tape.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Fat MassAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)The Fat Mass will be measure in kilograms by electrical bioimpedance on InBody 370
Changes in Total CholesterolAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measure in mg/dL using a dry chemistry system in Vitros 350 equipment.
Changes in TriglyceridesAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measure in mg/dL using a dry chemistry system in Vitros 350 equipment.
Changes in High-density lipoprotein (c-HDL)At the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measure in mg/dL using a dry chemistry system in Vitros 350 equipment.
Changes in Low-density lipoprotein (c-LDL)At the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be calculated using Friedewald formula, which uses the parameters of total cholesterol, HDL and VLDL and the result is reported in mg/dL
Changes in serum glucoseAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measure in mg/dL using a dry chemistry system in Vitros 350 equipment.
Changes in serum insulinAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)It be measure by chemiluminescence immunoassay in DiaSorin Liaison equipment
Changes in WeightAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)The weight will be measure in kilograms on InBody 370
Changes in serum Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL)At the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measured in pg/dL. Serum oxLDL levels will be quantified according to the supplier's instructions by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit provided by Cell Biolabs, Inc
Changes in serum Oxidized high-density lipoprotein (oxHDL)At the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measured in pg/dL. Serum oxHDL levels will be quantified according to the supplier's instructions by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit provided by Cell Biolabs, Inc
Changes in serum Total antioxidant capacityAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measure from serum samples using an OxiSelect TAC Assay Kit, (Cell Biolabs) and reported in mM.
Changes in serum Lipid peroxidationAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Will be measure in μM. Serum lipid peroxidation will be quantified according to the supplier's instructions by Lipid peroxidation assay kit, Oxford Biomedical
Changes in hsPCRAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Serum levels will be measure using an automated biochemical analyzer, Mindray BS-120 chemistry analyzer, from Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co.
Changes in ApoA1At the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Serum levels will be measure using an automated biochemical analyzer, Mindray BS-120 chemistry analyzer, from Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co.
Changes in ApoBAt the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Serum levels will be measure using an automated biochemical analyzer, Mindray BS-120 chemistry analyzer, from Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co.
Changes in homeostatic model assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)At the baseline (0 Month) and 1st month, 2nd month (final)Serum glucose and Insulin levels were be combined to report HOMA-IR calculated as described by Matthews

Countries

Mexico

Contacts

Primary ContactErika Martinez Lopez, PhD
erikamtz27@yahoo.com.mx3310585200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026