Skip to content

Empirical Intravenous Beta-Lactam Plus Metronidazole Vs Oral Cefixime Plus Metronidazole for the Treatment of Liver Abscess

Comparison of Empirical Intravenous Beta-Lactam Antimicrobials Plus Metronidazole and Oral Cefixime Plus Metronidazole Therapy for the Treatment of Liver Abscess: an Open Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06847126
Enrollment
220
Registered
2025-02-26
Start date
2025-02-25
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Abscess

Keywords

Liver Abscess, Empirical antimicrobials, Beta-lactam antimicrobials, Intravenous, Oral, Cefixime, Metronidazole

Brief summary

Liver abscess (LA) is potentially life threatening medical emergency requiring prompt medical intervention. The backbone of therapy is prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous drainage/ aspiration of the abscess. The standard care for liver abscess includes empirical antimicrobials consisting both antibacterial and amoebicidal agents along with percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the collection. The antimicrobial regimen should cover against E. histolytica until microbial etiology is established or liver abscess of amoebic etiology is ruled out. But still there is no straightforward general agreement or evidence based on clinical studies regarding the standard protocol for empirical antimicrobials concerning choice, route of administration or duration of antimicrobials therapy. Most of the experts preferred intravenous antimicrobials over oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complication. But, there is no clinical trial evidence to support the rational of using intravenous antibiotics up front instead of oral antimicrobials. Recently published institutional study also suggested that empirical oral antimicrobials (Cefexime/Ciprofloxacin) were efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess, successfully managing around 90 % cases of liver abscess. When treating a liver abscess, the choice of antimicrobials and the administration technique must be specially tailored depending upon the existence of complications and the patient's clinical reaction. In the absence of clinical trials, the rational for using of intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics upfront instead of oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complications is doubtful and may appear injudicious contributing future rise of antimicrobial resistance. The use of intravenous antibiotics upfront may also unnecessarily lengthen hospital stays, enhance therapeutic expenditure, and raise the risk of hospital-acquired infections in patients who are capable for taking antimicrobials orally. Oral antimicrobials strategy will promote earlier discharge from the hospital and the patient can return to usual activities earlier. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the comparison and efficacy of empirical intravenous Beta-lactam antimicrobials plus Metronidazole and oral Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess. In this randomised controlled open label clinical trial all the patients with newly diagnosed liver abscess confirmed with radiology imaging, either by USG or CT scan, presenting at emergency or medical OPD will be screened for enrolment in the study. Following written informed consent from the participants and/or their legal guardian, those who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited in the study. Subsequently the participants will be randomized into either intravenous or oral antimicrobial group. The intravenous-group will receive Beta-lactam antimicrobials (i.e Piperacillin-Tazobactum 4.5g q 8 hourly or Ceftriaxone 1g q 12 hourly or Meropenem 1g q 8 hourly or Imipenem-Cilastatin 500mg q 6 hourly) Plus intravenous Metronidazole 750mg q 8 hourly for 2weeks. The oral-group will receive tablet Cefixime 200 mg q 12 hourly plus tablet Metronidazole 800 mg q 8 hourly for 2 weeks. Both the group will be provided standard care of therapy including percutaneous drainage or aspiration as per indication and will be followed up for 8 weeks. The primary outcome of clinical cure and secondary outcome of incidence of treatment failure, mortality, duration of antimicrobial therapy, recurrence, adverse drug reaction (ADR), complications will be compared between the groups.

Interventions

DRUGIntravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

DRUGTablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

OTHERStandard medical care

Percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess along resuscitative and symptomatic medications

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All symptomatic patients with liver abscess verified by radiological imaging, either by computed tomography (CT) scan or ultrasound (USG), regardless of gender (male or female) and age ≥ 18 years, will be screened for registration in the study. \-

Exclusion criteria

Patients with past history of liver abscess, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypersensitivity to either Metronidazole or Cefixime or Beta-lactam antimicrobials will not be allowed to participate in the study. Patients with organ dysfunction with shock (blood pressure \< 90/60 mmHg), acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring oxygen therapy (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 or SpO2 ≤92%), encephalopathy (altered sensorium with GCS \< 15), acute kidney injury (increase in serum creatinine to ≥ 1.5 times from the baseline or serum creatinine ≥ 1.5) and not able to take orally will not be considered for participation in the study. Patients who are pregnant, have already received antimicrobials for more than 48 hours before to admission, or are receiving blood thinners such as antiplatelets or anticoagulants within 4 weeks of presentation and are unwilling to provide informed consent will also be excluded from the trial. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical cure8 weeksclinical cure is defined as defined as participants becoming asymptomatic with fever resolution for ≥48 hours, including USG demonstrating no drainable or aspiratable collection in the liver along with removal of the pigtail catheter if any.
Treatment failure8 weeksTreatment failure is defined as the fulfilling of any one or more of the following conditions: 1. Persistently symptomatic even after 72 h of empirical antimicrobial therapy and percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the hepatic collection 2. Emergence of fresh or additional collection in the liver during the course of empirical antimicrobial therapy 3. Emergence of shock and or new onset organ failure (Encephalopathy, ARDS, AKI, MODS) during the course of therapy, leading to modification of oral antimicrobials to intravenous antimicrobials or up gradation of the ongoing intravenous antimicrobials 4. If pus culture demonstrates growth of microorganism which is not sensitive to the ongoing antimicrobials (intravenous Beta-lactam or oral Cefixime) along with inadequate clinical response to the therapy 5. Participants requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 4 weeks of empirical antimicrobial therapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of the therapy8 weeksNumber of days of empirical antimicrobial therapy is required to achieve clinical cure
Need for prolong antibiotics therapy8 weeksAsymptomatic participants requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 2 weeks of empirical antimicrobial therapy to achieve clinical cure
Recurrence of liver abscess8 weeksEmergence of new liver abscess after achieving clinical cure during 8 weeks of follow up
Readmission8 weeksParticipants requiring repeated admission with in-hospital medical care to achieve clinical
Duration of hospital stay8 weeksNumber of days receiving in-hospital medical care
Adverse drug reaction (ADR)8 weeksIncidence of adverse drug reaction related to the ongoing antimicrobial therapy

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDeba Prasad Dhibar, MD Medicine
drdeba_prasad@yahoo.co.in+911722756670

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026