Skip to content

Slow Introduction of Nutrition for Ill Malnourished Children

Reduced Calorie Feeds in the Early Management of Ill Severely Malnourished Children: A Phase I Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06846749
Acronym
F50
Enrollment
135
Registered
2025-02-26
Start date
2025-02-05
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malnutrition, Child, Malnutrition, Infant, Malnutrition, Severe Acute

Keywords

Overfeeding, Refeeding syndrome, Glucose Dysregulation

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if giving lower calorie feeds during the first stage of treatment helps improve survival in severely malnourished children who are ill. The main question it aims to answer is: Is it safe to feed ill severely malnourished children lower calorie feeds during the early treatment phase? Researchers will compare two lower calorie feeds (F50 and F35) to the standard feed (F75) to see if they help children recover safely without increasing their risk of low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). Participants will: * Receive one of the lower calorie feeds (F50 or F35) or the standard feed (F75) during their hospital stay. * Be closely monitored for low blood sugar and signs for worsening of clinical symptoms. * Be treated until they are stable and ready to be fed more calories to help them gain weight.

Detailed description

Malnutrition is a leading cause of death, contributing to nearly 45% of all deaths in children under the age of 5 years worldwide. In its most severe form, severe malnutrition remains prevalent globally affecting more than 45 million children. Severely malnourished children have a strongly increased risk of death from common infectious diseases. Updates in treatment protocols for severe malnutrition have been the most impactful intervention against childhood mortality. Management of severely malnourished children hospitalized with critical illness is based on guidelines developed by the World Health Organization and consists of three main components: 1. Clinical stabilization 2. Treatment of underlying infections 3. Nutritional rehabilitation. Clinical stabilization includes administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, fluid resuscitation (if needed) and providing a nutritional stabilization feed that is called 'F75'. F75 was designed in the 1990's assuming that severely malnourished children with infections are metabolically vulnerable and have a range of micronutrient disturbances. F75 aims to provide 95 kcal/kg/day and was not intended for weight gain since, during this initial period, children are actively fighting infections. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F75 to ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) that provide a substantially higher amount of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain. Some children fail this transition and have to revert back to F75 for a period of time due to clinical deterioration or not tolerating the RUTF. Despite protocolized management of these highly vulnerable patients, mortality rates have remained high over the past decades and reported to range between 10-30%, depending on population, setting and duration of follow up. Scientific evidence from the last decade has started to reform the approach to care for critically ill children in relation to feeding. Evidence shows that, during severe infection, the body enters a catabolic state, which is critical for immune function and pathogen clearance. Overfeeding during this phase may disrupt essential metabolic processes, including a process of cellular recycling called autophagy, which play a key role in fighting infections. Studies in both high- and low-resource settings have shown that limiting caloric intake in the early days of critical illness may improve clinical outcomes, including reducing the risk of infections and decreasing ICU stay durations. No clinical trial has examined the optimal caloric intake for ill severely malnourished children in LMIC and the current F75 composition was only based on expert opinion. Our population and treatment settings are substantially different compared to high income settings. Children in LMIC are often wasted to a degree of severity not frequently observed in high resource settings. Severely malnourished children are thought to be at risk of refeeding syndrome, defined as an acute insulin response to rapid refeeding leading to electrolyte imbalances and hypoglycemia. In many LMIC, health resources are scarce and physician and nurse to patient ratios are low. Malnourished children are therefore managed using relatively protocolized but largely non-evidence-based approaches. This has led the World Health Organization (WHO) to press the scientific community to review of current practices. Intravenous fluid administration is often avoided due to the absence of fluid solutions, infusion pumps and lack of resources to monitor fluid intake. Parenteral nutrition is generally not available. Therefore, fluid and nutrition are mainly provided orally or through a nasogastric tube. We aim to test the safety and tolerability of using lower caloric feeds during the initial clinical stabilization phase of acutely ill severely malnourished children. Reducing caloric intake has been shown to improve clinical outcomes of critically ill children with malnutrition in high resource setting. We propose that applying a similar strategy during the initial stabilization phase will improve survival of critically ill children with malnutrition in low resource settings. However, reducing caloric intake in these children may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. Therefore, we will conduct a randomized phase I clinical trial specifically designed to assess and minimize this risk. The potential benefits on childhood survival renders this trial ethically and clinically justified. Given current data, the use of lower caloric feeds should be evaluated in this vulnerable population. Conducting this safety phase-I trial will be a critical step before proceeding with an efficacy-focused trial powered for mortality. The F50 and F35 feeds have been meticulously formulated for this trial. Their composition is identical to that of F75, with the only distinction being the reduction in calorie content with F50 aiming to provide 63kcal/kg/day and F35 aiming to provide 47kcal/kg/day. This ensures that the nutritional parameters and essential components remain consistent, while the lower calorie count aligns with the specific requirements of this trial. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F50 or F35 to RUTF that provide substantially higher amounts of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain. This novel trial design will be used to ensure the highest level of safety. Once the optimal and safe reduction in calories is determined, we would be able to perform a large intervention trial whereby the provided feeds (i.e., standard F75 or a reduced calorie feed) can be randomized and tested for efficacy in reducing mortality. This work has the potential to radically change how we manage seriously ill severely malnourished children and reduce the mortality in the most vulnerable children globally.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTF75 milk feeds

Standard 'F75' (75 kcal/100 ml) 95 kcal/kg/day 12.05 mg/kg/min glucose

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTF50 milk feeds

Reduced caloric 'F50' (50kcal/100ml) 63 kcal/kg/day 8.03mg/kg/min glucose

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTF35 milk feeds

Reduced caloric 'F35' (35 kcal/100ml) * 47 kcal/kg/day * 5.62 mg/kg/min glucose

Sponsors

The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
The Eleanor Crook Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Children's Investment Fund Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This is an open label trial.

Intervention model description

This is a parallel interventional study model, making use of the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method to help allocate patients to the different interventional products related to the risk of hypoglycemia compared to F75. The DSMB will be involved in decisions around continuing with a specific interventional product incorporating SAE data.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age - greater than or equal to 6 months to less than 59 months (age range for which WHO guidelines were developed and where children are not expected to be exclusively breastfeeding * Admitted to hospital with acute, non-traumatic illness and having received a maximum of 2 feeds of F75 at time of enrolment * Severe malnutrition (WHZ \<-3 z-scores of the median WHO growth standards and/or MUAC \<115mm) * Accompanied by care provider able to provide written or witnessed informed consent * Primary caregiver plans to stay in the study area for the duration of the study * Having no more than one clinical sign displayed below "Clinical/Lab Feature \& Criteria"

Exclusion criteria

* Has oedematous malnutrition (excluded for this safety focused trial as fluid accumulation influences weight which is used to calculate required caloric intake) * Requires immediate cardiac/respiratory resuscitation (chest compressions/ventilation) * Clinical contraindications for enteral nutrition * Admission for traumatic or surgical indication * Weighs \<3.5kg * Presence of terminal illness likely to result in death within 6 months * Known congenital heart disease * Have had 2 documented hypoglycaemic events in hospital * More than one clinical sign displayed below "Clinical/Lab Feature \& Criteria" * Primary caregiver declines to provide informed consent Clinical/Lab Feature \& Criteria Guidelines Clinical/Lab Feature: Respiratory distress Oxygenation Criteria: "Subcostal in-drawing" or "nasal flaring" or "head-nodding" Clinical/Lab Feature: Oxygenation Criteria: "Central cyanosis" or SaO2 \<90% Clinical/Lab Feature: Circulation Criteria: Limb temperature gradient or capillary refill \>3 seconds Clinical/Lab Feature: Reduced conscious level Criteria: AVPU \< "A" Clinical/Lab Feature: Rapid pulse Criteria: Heartbeat per min \> 180 Clinical/Lab Feature: Severe anemia Criteria: Haemoglobin \< 7g/dl Clinical/Lab Feature: Hypoglycemia Criteria: Blood glucose \< 3mmol/L Clinical/Lab Feature: Abnormal temperature Criteria: Axial temperature \<36 or \>38oC Clinical/Lab Feature: Very low MUAC Criteria: MUAC \<11cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Episodes of moderate hypoglycemiaDuring the period of F75/F50/F35 provision meaning the stabilization phase which is on average 3 daysThe occurrence of at least one episode of moderate hypoglycemia (less than or equal to 3.0 mmol/l) during the stabilization phase as measured utilizing the Dexcom Continous Glucose Monitoring Device and/or bed-side glucometer (OneTouch).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious Adverse EventsDuring the period of F75/F50/F35 provision meaning the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 daysThe number of severe adverse events between the intervention (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms. Diagnosis, date and time of onset, outcome severity and relation to the type of feed administration will be established within 24 hours and reported.
Episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemiaDuring the period of F75/F50/F35 provision meaning the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 daysThe number of episodes of hypoglycemia (less than or equal to 3.0mmol/l) or hyperglycemia (greater than or equal to 10 mmol/l) and glycemic variability between the intervention (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms. Measurements will be done utilizing the Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device and/or bed-side glucometer (OneTouch).
Duration of the stabilization phaseThe duration of the stabilization phase which is expected to be on average 3 days following enrolment.The duration of the stabilization phase in days - including when the child "failed to transition" between the intervention (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms.
Failed transition to ready-to-use-therapeutic foods (RUTF).Transition phase expected to be on average 3 days following start of RUTFReturn to stabilization feed after attempting to introduce RUTF.
Duration of hospital stayStudy enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 daysLength of time spent in hospital for the duration of the study
Volume of feed consumed per dayDuring the period of the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 daysCompare the volume of feeds consumed per day in ml/kg body weight for the interventions (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms.
Change in weightAdmission to clinical stabilization, which is on average 3 daysChange in weight from admission to clinical stabilization as determined by anthropometric measurements
Loose or watery stoolsStudy enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 daysThe number of loose or watery stools per day, using the Bristol Stool Scale.
Vomiting episodesStudy enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 daysNumber of vomiting episodes per day
Feeds withheldDuring the period of the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 daysNumber of feeds withheld from participant
New InfectionStudy enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 daysNew infection onset as defined by positive bacterial cultures
MortalityStudy enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 daysMortality as a number and percentage during hospitalization.

Countries

Bangladesh, Malawi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 25, 2026