Skip to content

Longitudinal Quantitative Neuromuscular MRI in Neuropathic Patients

Longitudinal Quantitative Neuromuscular MRI Evaluation in Patients With Acquired and Hereditary Neuropathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06845644
Acronym
IMAGINERV
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-02-25
Start date
2025-05-23
Completion date
2028-05-31
Last updated
2025-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Type 1A, Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloid Neuropathy, Acquired Demyelinating Neuropathy

Keywords

Neuromuscular MRI, Neuropathy, Intramuscular fat fraction

Brief summary

The pathophysiological process common to neuropathies is fatty replacement of muscle tissue, more commonly known as intramuscular fat fraction (F.F). MRI is an imaging technique that enables us to distinguish between muscle and fat tissue, and thus to objectify in vivo structural changes within nerves and muscles in neuropathic patients. In addition to visualizing these changes, quantitative neuromuscular MRI (qMRI) can be used to quantify a number of biomarkers associated with these pathophysiological processes. Over the past few years, this procedure has become a relevant tool in a number of neuromuscular pathologies, such as acquired and hereditary neuropathies. Thanks to its non-ionizing nature and its ability to explore tissues in three dimensions, MRI is the technique of choice for evaluating these diseases, complementing the clinical and electrophysiological scores available. In a context where numerous therapic strategies are being evaluated for the treatment of peripheral nervous system diseases, the clinical and electrophysiological scores currently available are proving inadequate for the detection of early change or a positive therapeutic effect. On the basis of a limited number of studies, quantitative MRI could provide much more sensitive therapeutic monitoring data over short periods of time which is crucial for future therapeutic trials. The most interesting MRI biomarker to date would therefore be the FF, which represents the percentage of fatty infiltration of muscles following pathological nerve damage. Other MRI biomarkers, such as quantified magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), proton density (PD), water transverse relaxation time (wT2) and three-dimensional volume, enable us to study the degenerative and inflammatory phenomena at work in these neuropathies from different angles, detailing the nerve and muscle damage in patients compared with healthy controls or presymptomatic patients. In patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) neuropathy in particular, qMRI is the only tool to detect significant longitudinal variation over a one-year period, revealing an average increase in FF in the lower limbs of +1.5% over 12 months. Confirmation of these results and their extension to other neuropathies such as hereditary amyloid neuropathies (ATTR-PN) or acquired demyelinating neuropathies (ADN) is therefore justified, but requires the implementation of standardized longitudinal studies including these different pathologies. As strong correlations between these MRI biomarkers and the main clinical scores have been demonstrated in several cross-sectional studies, the clinical value of this non-invasive tool is beyond doubt. The main limitation to the clinical deployment of this technology remains the time required for the manual segmentation step to delineate the areas of interest. The ongoing development of new image analysis techniques, as well as the contribution of artificial intelligence and deep learning to the imaging data extraction process, are well on the way to solving this problem, but require continuous updating of practices to identify the most interesting MRI biomarkers, facilitate their extraction and thus measure their clinical application with a view to future therapeutic trials.

Interventions

Quantitative neuromuscular MRI is used to quantify a number of biomarkers associated with these pathophysiological processes

Neuromuscular ultrasound is used to quantified nerve diameter variation

Sponsors

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female between 18 and 80 years of age, * Patients who have freely given their consent to participate in this study, * Patient with genetically confirmed hereditary CMT neuropathy * or patient with an acquired demyelinating neuropathy such as typical PIDC or anti-MAG of typical form * or a patient with a genetically confirmed pathogenic mutation in the transthyretin (TTRn) gene, * Patients who are beneficiaries or entitled beneficiaries of a social security scheme.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with co-morbidity or a history of other peripheral neuropathy, * Patients with alcohol or psychoactive substance abuse, * Patients with contraindications to MRI exploration: claustrophobia, pacemakers, Holter systems, IUDs, metal surgical clips, metal prostheses or implants (or other metal foreign bodies), * Patient unable to perform the MRI due to severe handicap, * Patient in a period of exclusion from another research protocol at the time of signing the consent/non-opposition form, * Subjects covered by articles L1121-5 to 1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (minors, adults under guardianship or trusteeship, patients deprived of their liberty, pregnant or breast-feeding women), * Persons who cannot read and understand the French language well enough to be able to give their consent to participate in research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annual intramuscular fat fraction progressionBetween inclusion and one year afterComparison of FF measurement in lower limb muscle using qMRI between inclusion and one year after

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annual percentage change in proton density (PD)Between inclusion and one year afterComparison of proton density in lower limb muscle using qMRI between inclusion and one year after
Annual percentage change in transverse relaxation time (T2)Between inclusion and one year afterComparison of transverse relaxation time in lower limb muscle using qMRI between inclusion and one year after
Annual percentage change in 3D volumeBetween inclusion and one year afterComparison of lower limb muscle 3D volume using qMRI between inclusion and one year after
Annual percentage change in magnetization transfer ratio (MTR)Between inclusion and one year afterComparison of magnetization transfer ratio in lower limb muscle using qMRI between inclusion and one year after
Annual variation of nerve diameter in ATTR-PN patientsBetween inclusion and one year afterComparison of nerve diameter using neuromuscular ultrasound between inclusion and one year after.
Correlation betxeen ultrasound-quantified nerve diameter variation and clinical and electrophysiological parameters in ATTR-PN patientsBetween inclusion and one year afterClinical parameters are: ONLS score, MRC testing and 10-meter walk test (for all patients), CMTNSv2 and CMTES-R scores (for CMT patients), PND, NIS and CADT scores (for ATTR-PN patients), QoL-MND, RODS scale and EVA (for ADN patients). Electrological parameters are obtained by MUNIX technique.
Correlations between MRI parameters and patients' clinical and electrophysiological parametersBetween inclusion and one year afterClinical parameters are: ONLS score, MRC testing and 10-meter walk test (for all patients), CMTNSv2 and CMTES-R scores (for CMT patients), PND, NIS and CADT scores (for ATTR-PN patients), QoL-MND, RODS scale and EVA (for ADN patients). Electrological parameters are obtained by MUNIX technique.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactEtienne FORTANIER, MD
etienne.fortanier@ap-hm.fr04 91 38 65 79

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026