Skip to content

Home Versus Hospital Based NIV Care in MND

Home Initiation and Monitoring of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) Versus Hospital-based Care in People with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) : a Randomised Control Trial (RCT) and Qualitative Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06844370
Acronym
HoHoNIV
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-02-25
Start date
2024-03-06
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2025-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motor Neurone Disease, Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

non invasive ventilation

Brief summary

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly offered to people with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) who have breathing difficulties. It improves their quality of life and can prolong life by 6 months or more. It is initially used at night and typically set up during a hospital admission. By the time that they develop respiratory failure and need to start NIV, however, most patients require wheelchairs or have other significant health problems. Repeated travel to hospitals is increasingly difficult with increasing disability. It is possible to start and monitor NIV treatment at home. This may be more convenient for selected patients, though starting NIV is quite complex; it is not known if home treatment is as safe and effective as hospital-based treatment. To establish this, 60 patients with MND who have indications for NIV will be recruited. They will be randomly allocated to a home-based treatment (home NIV set up plus home visits supported by telemonitoring) or hospital-based care (inpatient NIV set up plus outpatient NIV monitoring) and followed up at 1, 4 and 7 months. Alongside measures of treatment effectiveness, assessment of patient and carer preferences, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness will be undertaken. In the additional qualitative part on this study, interviews with patients who took part in the main study and their carers will be conducted to understand in more depth their perspective on what makes for a good or bad experience with NIV, how the environment (home vs hospital) influences their NIV experience and what personal factors determine NIV use. Findings from the interviews will inform the design of a truly patient-centred NIV service.

Interventions

OTHERNon-invasive ventilation

Providing ventilation support through non-invasive means

Sponsors

University of Nottingham
CollaboratorOTHER
MND Association
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Random allocation to either home or hospital based treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with a diagnosis of Motor Neurone Disease confirmed by a neurologist specialising in MND. * Indications to NIV: daytime pCO2 \>6.0 kPa or/and symptoms of ventilatory failure (e.g. orthopnoea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea, morning drowsiness) in the presence of significant diaphragmatic weakness confirmed by respiratory muscle tests

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment precluding understanding of the study protocol and valid consent * Severe co-morbidities (e.g. decompensated heart failure, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity) causing or contributing to respiratory failure * Immediate need to start NIV (\<24hrs) and/or acute illness requiring inpatient treatment e.g. intravenous antibiotics for pneumonia (in addition to the need for NIV) * Lack of a sufficient social/professional network to support NIV application at home * Not wishing to accept home NIV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Control of respiratory failure defined by daytime partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)measured at 1,4,7 months following NIV initiationDaytime PaCO2 measured by arterial puncture
Patients and carers experiences of starting and managing NIV, and factors that relate to NIV concordance and acceptance.measured at 4 weeks since starting NIVSemi-structured interview with patients and their carers

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SurvivalSurvival since NIV initiationSurvival (in months)
AdmissionsUp to 7 months from initiation of NIVNumber of additional planned and emergency hospital admissions
NIV setting changes1 , 4 and 7 monthsNumber of NIV setting changes required
Cost effectivenessUp to 7 months from initiation of NIVAbsolute costs and costs in relation to quality-adjusted life-years (using EQ-5D)
Nocturnal oximetry1,4,7 monthstime spent with oxygen saturation \<90%(TST90)
NIV acceptance1 monthPercent of patients using NIV for \>=4hrs/night
Quality of life assessment (EQ-5D-5L)1,4,7 ,monthsMeasurement of quality of life using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Quality of life (SRI)1,4, 7 monthsQuality of life measured using Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire
Quality of sleep1,4,7 ,monthsSleep quality measured with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Satisfaction with NIV and healthcare interactions7 monthsSatisfaction with NIV and healthcare interactions measured with a visual analogue scale
Other blood gas analysis measurements of hypoventilation1,4,7 monthsBicarbonate
NIV concordance1 , 4 and 7 monthsNIV adherence (machine usage in hours/24hours)

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactDariusz Wozniak
dariusz.wozniak@nhs.net01223639619
Backup ContactVictoria Stoneman
victoria.stoneman@nhs.net01223639865

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026