Skip to content

Evaluation of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: MINIject® Versus Hydrus® Microstent in Combination With Cataract Surgery

Evaluation of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: MINIject® Versus Hydrus® Microstent in Combination With Cataract Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06844292
Acronym
MINHY
Enrollment
152
Registered
2025-02-25
Start date
2025-03-03
Completion date
2031-03-03
Last updated
2025-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Glaucoma

Keywords

Glaucoma, Open-angle Glaucoma, Cataract, Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS), Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction

Brief summary

The study aims to investigate postoperative outcomes after two different MIGS implants (MINIject or Hydrus) in combination with cataract surgery for patients with glaucoma.

Detailed description

The study aims to investigate postoperative outcomes in terms of intraocular pressure as well as safety measures after two different MIGS implants (MINIject® or Hydrus®) in conjunction with cataract surgery (CS) for patients with chronic glaucoma. The patients will be followed up for 5 years after the date of their implantation. Standard ophthalmologic assessments including measurement of intraocular pressure, fundus examination and ocular imaging with OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography). Assessment of life quality as well as adverse events will be performed.

Interventions

DEVICEMINIject with Cataract Surgery

Patients will be randomized to receive either a MINIject implant or a Hydrus Microstunt in conjunction with cataract surgery. If randomized to MINIject, the device will be implanted into the supraciliary space with a minimally invasive ab interno approach. It is designed to be implanted with its head in the anterior chamber and its body in the supraciliary space, leading to improved natural uveoscleral outflow by directing aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the sub-scleral space. Cataract surgery will be performed with phacoemulsification.

DEVICEHydrus Microstent with Cataract Surgery

Patients will be randomized to receive either a Hydrus Microstunt or a MINIject implant in conjunction with cataract surgery. If randomized to Hydrus Microstent, the device will be implanted into Schlemm's canal through the trabecular meshwork in order to dilate and restore the natural aqueous outflow pathway through Schlemm's canal, leading to a reduction of intraocular pressure. Cataract surgery will be performed with phacoemulsification.

Sponsors

Medical University of Graz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Device: Phacoemulsification combined with minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), either Hydrus Microstent or MINIject. The patients will be randomized (1:1) to each treatment/intervention arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with glaucoma in which surgery is indicated to reach target intraocular pressure as well as lens opacities where CS is indicated * Clinically eligible for both surgeries * Subjects not anticipated to require any further surgery in the next 12 months * Patients' age \> 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not want to make follow-ups at the department * Angle closure, uveitic, neovascular, congenital glaucoma, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome, Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome * Prior filtering glaucoma surgery, suprachoroidal stent, retinal surgery, corneal graft surgery or cyclophotocoagulation * Allergy to any drugs or substances required for the protocol * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular Pressure After SurgeryBaseline visit to 1 yearMean IOP in mmHg one year after glaucoma surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anti-Hypertensive Medications RequiredBaseline visit and week 1, month 1/3/6 and year 1/2/3/4/5Number and type of anti-hypertensive medications used at specific study visit
Best Corrected Visual AcuityBaseline visit and week 1, month 1/3/6 and year 1/2/3/4/5Best Corrected Visual Acuity will be measured with Snellen charts and will be transformed to logMAR.
Complete SuccessBaseline visit and visit at month 3/6 and year 1/2/3/4/5Complete success is defined as either unmedicated IOP ≤21 mmHg, ≤18 mmHg, ≤15 and ≤12 mmHg and \>5 mmHg
Qualified SuccessBaseline visit and visit at month 3/6 and year 1/2/3/4/5Qualified success is defined as either medicated IOP ≤21 mmHg, ≤18 mmHg, ≤15 and ≤12 mmHg and \>5 mmHg
Endothelial Cell DensityBaseline visit and visit at year 1/2/3/4/5Endothelial cell density will be measured with a specular microscope.
Assessment of Life Quality - Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 QuestionnaireBaseline visit and visit at month 6 and year 1/2/3/4/5A modified Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) Questionnaire will be used to determine and document quality of life. The GQL-15 questionnaire is a 15-item survey designed to assess the impact of glaucoma on a patient's daily life and well-being. It evaluates how symptoms like vision impairment, discomfort, and treatment affect daily activities. The scores range from 0 (Minimum) to 60 (Maximum), with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact on quality of life, while lower scores suggest less impairment. 0-15: Minimal impact on quality of life 16-30: Mild impact on quality of life 31-45: Moderate impact on quality of life 46-60: Severe impact on quality of life
Assessment of Life Quality - Ocular Surface Disease IndexBaseline visit and visit at month 6 and year 1/2/3/4/5The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) will be used to determine and document quality of life. The OSDI is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess the severity of dry eye symptoms and their impact on daily life. The total score ranges from 0 (Minimum) to 100 (Maximum), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. 0-12: Minimal or no dry eye symptoms 13-22: Mild symptoms 23-32: Moderate symptoms 33-100: Severe symptoms
Intraocular Pressure at Other Follow-Up Time PointsBaseline visit to 5 yearsIOP at other follow-up visits such as week 1, month 1/3/6 and year 2/3/4/5 after surgery.
Rate of Complications or Incidents5 yearsComplications associated with both surgical procedures will be assessed.
Data From Optical Biometry - Axial LengthBaseline visit and year 1 visitAxial Length of the eyeball from optical biometry will be measured.
Data From Optical Biometry - Anterior Chamber DepthBaseline visit and year 1 visitAnterior chamber depth from optical biometry will be measured.
Data From Optical Biometry - Corneal Surface ParametersBaseline visit and year 1 visitCorneal surface parameters (K-values) from optical biometry will be measured.
Standard Automated PerimetryBaseline visit and visit at month 6 and year 1/2/3/4/5Standard automated perimetry will be examined, the mean defect will be given in dB.
Optical Coherence Tomography - RNFL ThicknessBaseline visit and visit at month 1/3/6 and year 1/2/3/4/5RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) thickness will be measured via OCT scan.
Rate of Additional Ocular Surgery Post-Implantation5 yearsRate of additional ocular surgery post-implantation will be collected at every study visit.

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactEwald Lindner, Prof.
ewald.lindner@medunigraz.at+4331638580810
Backup ContactLena M Haiden, MD
lena.haiden@medunigraz.at+4331638530798

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026