Skip to content

The Adjunctive Effect of a Titanium Brush in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis

The Adjunctive Effect of a Titanium Brush in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: a Randomized Multi-Center Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06843928
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-02-25
Start date
2024-06-12
Completion date
2026-07-16
Last updated
2025-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-surgical Submucosal Debridement, Peri-implantitis, Titanium Brush

Brief summary

Peri-implantitis is a plaque-associated condition occurring around dental implants, characterized by inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa and loss of supporting bone. To stop this progression, mechanical debridement of biofilm and calculus is commonly used to treat peri-implant lesions as well as the use of adjunctive measures such as titanium brushes. As observed, they improved plaque removal when compared with steel curettes alone. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the impact of this procedure in terms of clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes to assess their efficacy.

Interventions

DEVICESubmucosal debridement

Participants will undergo non-surgical submucosal debridement alone (SD)

DEVICESubmucosal debridement + titanium brushes

Participants will undergo non-surgical submucosal debridement + titanium brushes (SD+TiBr)

Sponsors

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with ≥18 years of age. * Ability to understand all the study procedures and to comply with them along the entire study period. Ability and willingness to give written informed consent. * An adequate level of oral hygiene (plaque index ≤ 25%) (O'Leary et al., 1972). * Treated periodontal disease. * Presence of at least one titanium implant with peri-implantitis \[i.e., presence of bleeding and/or suppuration on gentle probing with probing depth of ≥6 mm, and progressive bone loss. In the absence of initial radiographs, a bone level ≥2 mm apical to the most coronal part of the intrabony portion of the implant will be used as threshold of disease (Romandini et al., 2021)\]. * Horizontal and vertical peri-implant bone defects. * Implant function time ≥ 1 year. * Presence of ≥2mm of keratinized peri-implant mucosa. * Screw-retained single and multiple restorations.

Exclusion criteria

* Untreated periodontitis. * Smokers \> 10 cigarettes per day. * Local or systemic diseases that would interfere with routine periodontal therapy (i.e., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV, chronic high-dose steroid therapy, metabolic bone disease, radiation, immunosuppressive disease, hepatic dysfunction, immunosuppressive disease, autoimmune disease). * Pregnant or lactating women. * Previous surgical and non-surgical treatment of affected implants at least 12 months prior to the beginning of the study. * Radiographic peri-implant bone loss \> two-thirds. * Mobility of the implant. * Known allergy or intolerance to macrolides. * Use of systemic antibiotics during the last 3 months. * Need of endocarditis prophylaxis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pocket depth changes12 MonthsThe primary outcome variable will be pocket depth changes at 1 year of follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Full mouth bleeding index (FMBI)12 MonthsAssessed dichotomously as presence or absence of bleeding after 30 seconds of gently probing. The proportion of bleeding surfaces out of the total number of examined surfaces will be calculated.
Modified plaque index (mPI)12 Months* Score 0: no detection of plaque. * Score 1: plaque only recognized by running a probe across the smooth marginal surface of the implant. * Score 2: plaque can be seen by the naked eye. * Score 3: abundance of soft matter.
Modified bleeding index (mBI)12 Months* Score 0: no bleeding. * Score 1: isolated bleeding spots visible. * Score 2: blood forms a confluent red line on margin. * Score 3: heavy or profuse bleeding.
Suppuration on probing (SoP)12 MonthsPresence or absence of suppuration after gentle probing.
Full mouth plaque index (FMPI)12 MonthsAssessed dichotomously as presence or absence of plaque will be scored if present along the gingival margin and if it can be removed with the side of the probe. The percentage of surfaces with plaque out of the total number of examined tooth surfaces will be calculated.
Keratinized mucosa (KM)12 MonthsDistance (mm) from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction at the midbuccal aspect of the implant.
Radiographic parameters12 MonthsMarginal bone level (MBL): distance (mm) between the implant shoulder and the base of the defect at the mesial and distal aspect.
Microbiological analysis12 MonthsTotal bacterial load (CFU/ml) Microbiome alpha-diversity
Mucosal recession (MR)12 MonthsDistance (mm) from the mucosal margin and the interface between implant and abutment.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactJavi Vilarrasa
jvilarrasa@uic.es+34 628553000
Backup ContactFares Al Hajeb
faresalhajeb@uic.es+34 696062892

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026