Skip to content

Perioperative Rectal Methadone in Spine Surgery

Perioperative Rectal Methadone in Spine Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06843174
Acronym
PROMISE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-02-24
Start date
2025-02-19
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-operative Care, Post-operative Pain Management, Spinal Surgery

Keywords

Intraoperative Methadone, Rectal Methadone administration, spinal surgery post-operative pain management

Brief summary

Patients undergoing spinal surgery require pain control medication after their surgery. Investigators have successfully used intravenous Methadone to manage pain after surgery. However, doctors in Canada do not have the intravenous form of Methadone to prescribe to their patients. The investigators in Canada propose a pilot trial to investigate whether Methadone administered rectally could be used to manage pain after spinal surgery. The main questions are: 1. Are investigators able to recruit participants for this trial and learn from this study to plan a larger trial? 2. Does Methadone administered rectally during surgery, reduce participants' pain intensity, use less pain medication, and have a better recovery after surgery? Investigators will compare Methadone to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if Methadone works to manage pain after surgery better than the usual pain management. Participants will: * receive either Methadone or placebo during surgery. * be asked some questions about their pain during days 1 to 3 after surgery * be contacted by phone to ask about their recovery At this time, the study aims to recruit 40 participants from St. Michael's Hospital, to learn whether it will be feasible to plan a larger study.

Detailed description

Indication: Adult patients undergoing spine surgery Condition: Perioperative pain management Number of participants 40 Primary outcome Feasibility (recruitment success, consent rate, adherence, patient withdrawal, missing data, adverse outcomes) Secondary outcome 1) Average pain intensity; 2) Rate of respiratory depression and postoperative ileus; 3) Use of opioids in morphine equivalents; 4) Quality of recovery Study design * Interventional trial * Allocation: Randomized * Intervention model: 2-Arm Parallel-Group * Primary purpose: Feasibility * Phase: Phase IV Masking Participants and Outcome Assessors Study Intervention: * Intervention Arm: Methadone 0.2mg/kg of ideal body weight via rectal administration + standard or care * Placebo Arm: Saline solution via rectal administration + standard of care Follow-Up: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 30

Interventions

DRUGRectal Methadone administer during spinal surgery

Rectal Methadone administered during spinal surgery for post-operative pain management

OTHERPlacebo: Rectal saline solution

Placebo: Rectal saline solution single dose received during surgery

Sponsors

AFP Innovation Fund
CollaboratorOTHER
Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, placebo control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 to 65 years-old. 2. Elective spinal surgery with fusion of one or more sacral, lumbar, thoracic, and/or cervical levels 3. Capacity to provide informed consent 4. For participants of childbearing potential, use of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status \> IV 2. Hypersensitivity to the active substance (methadone hydrochloride) or other opioid analgesics or to any ingredient in the formulation 3. Pregnant or nursing participants 4. Known or suspected mechanical gastrointestinal obstruction 5. Acute respiratory depression, elevated carbon dioxide levels in the blood, cor pulmonale, or pulmonary disease necessitating home oxygen therapy 6. Acute alcohol intoxication, delirium tremens, and convulsive disorders secondary to alcohol intoxication 7. Severe central nervous system depression, increased intracranial pressure, or head injury 8. Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, such as isocarboxazid, phenelzine, selegiline, and tranylcypromine, within 14 days of enrollment 9. Diarrhea associated with pseudomembranous colitis caused by cephalosporins, lincomycins, or penicillins 10. Preoperative renal insufficiency or failure 11. Significant liver disease (cirrhosis or hepatic failure) 12. History of opioid use disorder within the last 3 months 13. Patients taking more than 90 mg of morphine equivalents daily 14. Poor comprehension of the English language 15. Patients who are likely to remain intubated postoperatively 16. QT interval \> 500ms on preoperative ECG

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility to recruit 40 participants into a trial of methadone and placebo18 monthsRecruitment rate (Acceptability and feasibility study)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid reductionAt 24, 48, and 72 hours post operativeTotal morphine equivalent used
Adverse outcomesAt 24, 48, and 72 hours post operativeRate of postoperative respiratory depression
Pain intensity after surgeryAt 24, 48, and 72 hours post operativePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS) Pain Intensity, Pain intensity scale- 0 to 10 (The higher the number the higher the pain intensity)
Quality of RecoveryAt 24, 48, and 72 hours post operativeQuality of Recovery (QoR-15) Score, 15 items are rated on a 0-10 scale, with the total possible score ranging from 0 to 150, where higher scores indicate better recovery.
Pain interferenceDifference between Baseline and 30 days after surgeryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference, PROMIS 6 a. 6 items, 5 Likert scale (the higher the score the higher the interference from pain)

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactSergio Pereira, MD PhD
Sergio.Pereira@unityhealth.to416-360-4000
Backup ContactJanneth A Pazmino-Canizares, MSc
Janneth.Pazmino-Canizares@unityhealth.to4168646060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026