Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Ranquilon in Patients With Anxiety Disorders Due to Neurasthenia and Adjustment Disorders

An Open-label, Comparative, Randomized, Multicenter Phase IV Clinical Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of the Drug Ranquilon, Tablets, 1 mg, in Patients With Anxiety Disorders Due to Neurasthenia and Adjustment Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06843044
Enrollment
250
Registered
2025-02-24
Start date
2025-01-13
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adjustment Disorders, Anxiety, Neurasthenia

Brief summary

Study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Ranquilon, 1 mg tablets, at a dosage of 6 mg/day compared to the drug Afobazole, 10 mg tablets, at a dosage of 30 mg/day for the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders due to neurasthenia and adjustment disorders.

Interventions

1 mg tablets

DRUGAfobazole

10 mg tablets

Sponsors

Valenta Pharm JSC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females aged 18 to 70 years; 2. Written informed consent form in accordance with current legislation; 3. Patients with anxiety and established diagnoses based on ICD-10 criteria: neurasthenia (F48.0) or adjustment disorder (F43.2); 4. Anxiety severity on the HARS scale of 18-24 points; 5. Assessment of the severity of suicidal thoughts using the Columbia scale \<3 points; 6. Severity of asthenia on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory Scale (MFI-20) greater than 50 points; 7. Total score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) \< 6; 8. Score on the CGI-s scale of at least 4 points; 9. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential; 10. Agreement to use effective contraceptive methods throughout the study and for 30 days after its completion (for women of childbearing potential and men); 11. Ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent (including consent for the use and disclosure of health-related information), and comply with the procedures outlined in the study protocol. Non-inclusion Criteria: 1. Known intolerance to the active and/or excipient substances contained in the study drugs; 2. Known lactase deficiency, lactose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption, or galactose intolerance; 3. Patients requiring prohibited concomitant therapy within this study (MAO inhibitors, antidepressants, neuroleptics, anxiolytics and sedatives (including herbal), hypnotics when used on a regular basis), or who have taken these medications within the last month; 4. Established or suspected alcohol/narcotic substance use at the time of screening or randomization, and/or a history of alcohol, narcotic, or drug dependence; 5. Presence of oncological diseases, including in history (except for cured tumors with stable remission for more than 5 years); 6. Tuberculosis, including in history; 7. Presence of HIV, chronic viral hepatitis B/C, syphilis (including past history), or a positive test for HIV, hepatitis B/C, or syphilis at screening; 8. Patients with a diagnosis of other anxiety disorders (F41) established based on ICD-10 criteria; 9. Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders, affective disorders, and panic disorders; 10. Acute psychosis (endogenous-processual, organic, or somatogenic), including in history; 11. Organic lesions of the central nervous system of traumatic and alcoholic origin; 12. Post-encephalitic syndrome; 13. History of brain tumors (including past diagnoses); 14. Degenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), particularly multiple sclerosis; 15. History of depression (including past episodes); 16. Suicide attempts in history; 17. Generalized anxiety disorder, including in history; 18. History of epilepsy and seizures (including past episodes); 19. Decompensated diabetes mellitus; 20. Established diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage 3A and above, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula ≤ 59 ml/min/1.73 m²; 21. Established diagnosis of liver failure of any severity, or elevated levels of ALT, AST or total bilirubin \>3 times the upper limit of normal according to laboratory standards; 22. History of major surgical interventions within six months prior to screening; 23. Chronic heart failure III-IV functional class according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification; 24. Severe, decompensated, or unstable diseases (any diseases or conditions that poses a life-threatening risk to the patient, worsens the patient's prognosis, or makes participation in the clinical study impossible); 25. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant during the study or within 30 days after participation ends; 26. Refusal by the patient to use permitted methods of contraception or to completely abstain from sexual contact throughout the entire period of participation in the study starting from Visit 0 and for 30 days after completion of participation; 27. Current participation or planned participation by the patient in psychological or psychotherapeutic activities aimed at treating anxiety disorder during the clinical trial period; 28. Participation in any other clinical trial within 90 days prior to the start of the screening period; 29. Lack of patient cooperation; 30. Other reasons, at the investigator's discretion, that may hinder the patient's participation in the study or pose unjustified risk to the patient.

Exclusion criteria

1. The patient's decision to withdraw from the study (revocation of informed consent); 2. Each patient has the right to discontinue participation in the study at any time without explanation. Withdrawal from the study will not affect the medical care provided to the patient in the future; 3. The investigator's decision that the patient needs to be excluded in the best interest of the patient; 4. The patient refuses to cooperate with the investigator or is non-compliant; 5. Emergence of reasons/situations during the study that threaten the patient's safety (e.g., hypersensitivity reactions, serious adverse events, etc.); 6. Inclusion of a patient in the study that does not meet the inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of patients with a significant reduction in anxiety levels (by 50% or more) on Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) compared to baseline on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale (from 0 points as absence of the symptom to 4 points as the worst possible symptom). Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14th item relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with a reduction in anxiety levels on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) scale to 17 points or less on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale (from 0 points as absence of the symptom to 4 points as the worst possible symptom). Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14th item relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations.
Proportion of patients with a score of 2 points or less on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-s) scale as assessed by the physician (healthy or borderline disorder) on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)The scale ranges from 1 to 7 points, where 1 indicates healthy and 7 indicates very severe disorder.
Change in the severity of the patient's condition on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-s) scale by Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)The scale ranges from 1 to 7 points, where 1 indicates healthy and 7 indicates very severe disorder.
Change in the total score on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)If the total score on any of the subscales (General Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Decreased Motivation, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue) is above 12, it may serve as preliminary grounds for diagnosing asthenic syndrome. Each subscale is assessed from 4 points (lack of symptoms) to 20 points (worst symptoms possible).
Proportion of patients with a reduction in total score on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) by 25% on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on any of the subscales (General Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Decreased Motivation, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue) is above 12, it may serve as preliminary grounds for diagnosing asthenic syndrome. Each subscale is assessed from 4 points (lack of symptoms) to 20 points (worst symptoms possible).
Proportion of patients with a reduction in total score on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) by 50% on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on any of the subscales (General Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Decreased Motivation, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue) is above 12, it may serve as preliminary grounds for diagnosing asthenic syndrome. Each subscale is assessed from 4 points (lack of symptoms) to 20 points (worst symptoms possible).
Proportion of patients with a total score on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) reduced to 30 points or less on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on any of the subscales (General Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Decreased Motivation, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue) is above 12, it may serve as preliminary grounds for diagnosing asthenic syndrome. Each subscale is assessed from 4 points (lack of symptoms) to 20 points (worst symptoms possible).
Absolute value of the patient's self-assessment of their subjective condition for all individual items on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) scale by Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on any of the subscales (General Fatigue, Reduced Activity, Decreased Motivation, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue) is above 12, it may serve as preliminary grounds for diagnosing asthenic syndrome. Each subscale is assessed from 4 points (lack of symptoms) to 20 points (worst symptoms possible).
Change in total score on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) by Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)A severity rating of 3 or higher indicates a serious risk of suicide. A rating of 5 and any identified suicidal actions indicate an extremely high risk and an absolute necessity for urgent therapeutic measures and hospitalization. The section intensity of suicidal thoughts allows for a more accurate assessment of severity and prediction of its dynamics.
Change in total score on the Emotional Eating Questionnaire by Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)The scale ranges from 0 to 30 points, where a minimum indicates no emotional overeating and a maximum indicates a strong dependence of eating behavior on emotional state.
Change in total score on the Psychological Stress Measure (PSM-25) by Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)A score below 99 indicates low stress, a score between 100-125 indicates moderate stress; a score above 125 indicates high stress
Safety and Tolerability: adverse event (AE) rateFrom the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 43 ± 1 for each participantNumber and frequency of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs)
Safety and Tolerability: AEs associated with the study drugFrom the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 43 ± 1 for each participantNumber and frequency of AEs or SAEs associated with the study drug
Safety and Tolerability: treatment discontinuationFrom the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 43 ± 1 for each participantPercentage of patients who discontinued treatment due to the occurrence of AEs/SAEs
Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - systolic blood pressure (SBP)Screening, day 1, day 29 ± 1, day 43 ± 1SBP, mmHg
Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - diastolic blood pressure (DBP)Screening, day 1, day 29 ± 1, day 43 ± 1DBP, mmHg
Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - respiratory rate (RR)Screening, day 1, day 29 ± 1, day 43 ± 1RR, breaths per minute
Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - heart rate (HR)Screening, day 1, day 29 ± 1, day 43 ± 1HR, beats per minute
Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - body temperatureScreening, day 1, day 29 ± 1, day 43 ± 1Body temperature, Celsius scale
Safety and Tolerability: concomitant treatmentFrom the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 43 ± 1 for each participantData on concomitant treatment (if any)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - hemoglobinScreening, day 29 ± 1Hemoglobin (g/L)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - hematocritScreening, day 29 ± 1Hematocrit (%)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - red blood cell countScreening, day 29 ± 1Red blood cell count (cells/L)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - platelet countScreening, day 29 ± 1Platelet count (cells/L)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - leukocyte countScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte count (cells/L)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - erythrocyte sedimentation rateScreening, day 29 ± 1Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - myelocytesScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte formula (myelocytes, %)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - band neutrophilsScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte formula (band neutrophils, %)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - segmented neutrophilsScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte formula (eosinophils, %)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - basophilsScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte formula (basophils, %)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - monocytesScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte formula (monocytes, %)
Safety and Tolerability: clinical blood test - lymphocytesScreening, day 29 ± 1Leukocyte formula (lymphocytes, %)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - specific gravityScreening, day 29 ± 1Specific gravity of the urine
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - colorScreening, day 29 ± 1Color of the urine
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - transparencyScreening, day 29 ± 1Transparency of the urine
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - pHScreening, day 29 ± 1pH of the urine
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - proteinScreening, day 29 ± 1Protein concentration (g/L)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - glucoseScreening, day 29 ± 1Glucose concentration (mmol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - red blood cellsScreening, day 29 ± 1Red blood cell content (number in sight)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - white blood cellsScreening, day 29 ± 1White blood cell content (number in sight)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - epithelial cellsScreening, day 29 ± 1Epithelial cell content (number in sight)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - ketone bodiesScreening, day 29 ± 1Ketone bodies (mmol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - urobilinogenScreening, day 29 ± 1Urobilinogen (mcmol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - glucoseScreening, day 29 ± 1Glucose concentration (mmol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - cholesterolScreening, day 29 ± 1Total cholesterol concentration (mmol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - proteinScreening, day 29 ± 1Total protein concentration (g/L)
Change in anxiety levels according to the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) scale on Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baselineDay 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale (from 0 points as absence of the symptom to 4 points as the worst possible symptom). Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14th item relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations.
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - creatinineScreening, day 29 ± 1Creatinine concentration (micromol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - alkaline phosphataseScreening, day 29 ± 1Alkaline phosphatase activity (U/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - alanine transaminaseScreening, day 29 ± 1Alanine transaminase activity (U/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - aspartate transaminaseScreening, day 29 ± 1Aspartate transaminase activity (U/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - ureaScreening, day 29 ± 1Urea concentration (mmol/L)
Safety and Tolerability: blood chemistry - bilirubinScreening, day 29 ± 1Total bilirubin concentration (micromol/L)

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026