Skip to content

The Effect of Intramuscular Ventrogluteal Injection Training Given by Pecha Kucha Method

The Effect of Intramuscular Ventrogluteal Injection Training Given by Pecha Kucha Method on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Skills and Satisfaction Levels: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06840353
Enrollment
76
Registered
2025-02-21
Start date
2025-03-04
Completion date
2025-04-04
Last updated
2025-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injection Site

Keywords

Pain, Nursing, Education, Injections, Intramuscular

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of intramuscular Ventrogluteal injection training given with the Pecha Kucha method on the knowledge, skill and satisfaction levels of nursing students.

Detailed description

Intramuscular injection is a very important intervention among basic nursing skills. Intramuscular injection technique to the ventrogluteal region is one of the safest injection techniques. In teaching this technique, both the knowledge and skills of the students can be increased by using different education methods. This research will be carried out to determine the effect of intramuscular ventrogluteal injection training given with the Pecha Kucha method on the knowledge, skill and satisfaction levels of nursing students. Method: Data will be collected with the Introductory Information Form, Knowledge Test for Intramuscular Injection to the Ventrogluteal Region, Skill Test for Intramuscular Injection to the Ventrogluteal Region, Satisfaction Visual Analog (VAS) Scale. Data will be collected face to face between March 2025 and May 2025.

Interventions

OTHERExperimental group (Pecha Kucha training)

Ventrogluteal injection training given to students using the Pecha Kucha training method

Sponsors

Necmettin Erbakan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

The researcher will not know which group the participants were assigned to.

Intervention model description

Single-blind parallel group randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course for the first time * Being between the ages of 18-25 * Students who can speak and understand Turkish fluently. * Students who accept to participate in the study voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

* Students who have previously taken the Fundamentals of Nursing 1st year course. * Students who are graduates of Health Vocational High School. * Students who have transferred to the nursing department with the vertical transfer exam.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge Test for Intramuscular Injection to the Ventrogluteal Region15 minutes after training, 1 month after trainingIt is a test with 24 propositions about VG injection. Propositions are answered as true, false and I have no idea. 1 point is given for each correct answer. The form was developed by the research team

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skill Test for Intramuscular Injection to the Ventrogluteal Region2 hours later after training, 1 month after trainingIt was prepared to measure the skill levels of students regarding VG injection application. It is a test that includes 33 application steps about VG injection and is evaluated out of 100 points in total. The student who performs each application step receives the score given in the test in return. The test is evaluated based on the total score. The form was developed by the research team
Satisfaction Visual Analog (VAS) Scale:15 minutes after trainingThe scale consists of a horizontal or vertical line, scaled as 10 cm/100 mm. In this study, a form scored between 0-10 points in the horizontal feature will be used. In the satisfaction assessment, a score of 0 on the scale indicates no satisfaction, and a score of 10 indicates very satisfied

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026