Skip to content

An Assistant Model for IRD Care Needs: A Randomized Control Trial

A Multi-stage Evaluation Foundation Model for Inherited Retinal Diseases Care Needs: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06839170
Acronym
IRD
Enrollment
300
Registered
2025-02-21
Start date
2025-02-27
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inherited Retinal Diseases

Brief summary

we present FM-IRD(also designated as Retina4IRD), the first foundation model-based AI system specifically designed for genotype diagnosis of IRD by emulating clinician decision-making reasoning process. Retina4IRD is capable of processing multimodal input including color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and descriptive medical metadata. Trained and validated on genetically confirmed cases from centers across China, South Korea, and Poland, the system generates a ranked list of candidate pathogenic genetic variants. Retina4IRD also can generated attention heatmaps to enhance decision-making interpretability. To validate its clinical impact, we conducted a prospective multicenter RCT involving 295 participants, rigorously assessing Retina4IRD's diagnostic accuracy and real-world utility. This will improve the standardized diagnosis of IRD diseases, effectively transforming the traditional time-consuming and resource-intensive diagnostic pathway into an efficient intelligent workflow

Detailed description

A randomized, controlled validation trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Retina4IRD (also designated as FM-IRD) in clinical settings. This trail was conducted at seven centers in China with large outpatient IRDs care . Participants were recruited from the outpatient of IRD clinics of the participating centers, or through referrals from collaborating retinal specialists. Given that genetic testing results were unavailable at enrollment, and to prioritize the model's ability to identify patients with actionable therapeutic targets, genotypes of our randomized controlled trial were categorized into 17 classes, including mutations with available gene therapies or ongoing clinical trials. All participants provided written informed consent before enrolment assessments. All participants subsequently underwent WES testing to confirm the causative genetic mutations, which served as the gold standard for IRD gene mutation diagnosis.

Interventions

OTHERFM-IRDs assisted

A Foundation Model for Assisting the precision Diagnosis of Inherited Retinal Diseases: FM-IRDs

OTHERwithout FM-IRDs

without FM-IRDs

Sponsors

Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presenting with clinical features suggestive of suspected IRD based on the initial assessment by the physician

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to undergo WES genetic testing. * Screening for a history of intraocular surgery in both eyes within the past 6 months; * Subjects with severe systemic diseases, intellectual developmental disorders, psychiatric illnesses, etc. * Patient data that the investigator deems necessary to exclude.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The diagnostic accuracy of IRDs21 daysThe top-5 gene mutation prediction accuracy, which will be assessed after all participants of the study have had WES test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of the health management strategy7 daysThe secondary endpoint is defined as the quality of the health management strategy formulated for the top-one predicted genotype, which encompassed four dimensions: available interventions, recommended follow-up intervals, fertility counseling recommendations, and the necessity of multidisciplinary consultation. The quality of the strategy is evaluated using a comprehensive scoring system, which was developed by a panel of multiple experts. This system has a score range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The final assessment is conducted independently by two senior IRD experts.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORXiaodong Sun, PhD

Shanhai General Hopsital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 26, 2026