Skip to content

Real-world Effects of Using Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Pharmacist-led Coaching on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Among Adults Not Using Insulin (REAL isCGM T2D)

Real-world Effects of Using Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Pharmacist-led Coaching on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Among Adults Using Non-insulin Antihyperglycemic Agents

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06837103
Acronym
REAL isCGM T2D
Enrollment
250
Registered
2025-02-20
Start date
2025-04-09
Completion date
2026-05-31
Last updated
2025-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

continuous glucose monitoring, type 2 diabetes, time in range, HbA1c

Brief summary

The goal of this prospective study is to evaluate diabetes outcomes after initiating second generation intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) plus one pharmacist consultation session compared with capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring among insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a specialist endocrinology clinical setting in Canada. Primary Outcome - To evaluate change in HbA1c at 3-6 months follow-up after initiating isCGM plus one pharmacist consultation (isCGM cohort) compared with CBG monitoring (CBG cohort) among insulin-naïve adults with T2D. Secondary Outcomes - To determine the change in metabolic outcomes and patient reported outcomes (PROs) and number of non-insulin antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) prescribed from baseline to 3-6 months (± 6 weeks) in the isCGM cohort compared to the CBG cohort. Another secondary outcome is to assess isCGM metrics and number of isCGM discontinuations in the isCGM cohort at 3-6 months (± 6 weeks) compared to baseline. Additionally the study will describe and/or evaluate glycemic and metabolic outcomes, and PROs in participants who initiate an isCGM device and opt to enroll in a diabetes coaching program (isCGM+coaching cohort) at baseline compared to follow-up at 3-6 months (± 6 weeks). Exploratory Outcomes - To compare change in HbA1c between the matched isCGM cohort and CBG cohort by subgroups: age (\< 65 years old vs ≥ 65 years old) and baseline HbA1c (\< 8.5% vs ≥ 8.5%).

Interventions

DEVICEIntermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitor

intervention used by the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching groups

Sponsors

Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * Clinical diagnosis of T2D ≥ one year * Using at least one AHA * Status as a Sun Life group benefits member, initiates isCGM device through Lumino Health™ Pharmacy, and completes one initial pharmacist consultation (isCGM cohort) or completes 2 or more diabetes coaching program consultations (isCGM+coaching cohort); or has private health insurance and uses CBG monitoring (CBG cohort) * Baseline HbA1c ≥ 7.0% * ≥ 1 HbA1c value up to 6 months prior to index date * Exclusive use of isCGM for ≥ 3 months * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Have a history of insulin use * Are pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of study enrollment or become pregnant during the study * Have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2 * Previously used rtCGM or isCGM for \> 3 months * Recent or expectant change to antihyperglycemic medications or doses within 30 days of index date

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1cfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the change in HbA1c at 3-6 months follow-up (±6 weeks) in the matched isCGM and CBG cohorts among adults with insulin-naïve T2D

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Weightfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the change in weight in the isCGM and CBG cohorts
Change in BMIfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the change in body mass index (BMI) in the isCGM and CBG cohorts
Change in Blood Pressurefrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the change in blood pressure in the isCGM and CBG cohorts
Proportion of Participants Achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.0% at Follow-Upfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.0% at follow-up in the isCGM and CBG cohort
Proportion of Participants with ≥1 Self-Reported Hypoglycemic Event per Weekfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the proportion of participants with ≥1 self-reported hypoglycemic event per week in the isCGM and CBG cohort
Percent Time in Range (TIR)from enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate percent time in range (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Percent Time Below Range (TBR)from enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate percent time below range (\< 3.9 mmol/L) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Percent Time Below Range (TBR) in Level 2 Hypoglycemiafrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate Percent TBR in level 2 hypoglycemia (\< 3.0 mmol/L) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Percent Time Above Range (TAR)from enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate Percent TAR (\> 10.0 mmol/L) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Estimated Glucose Management Indicator (eGMI)from enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the Estimated Glucose Management Indicator (eGMI) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)from enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the change in body mass index in only the isCGM+Coaching cohort
Proportion of participants with ≥1 self-reported hypoglycemic event per weekfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the proportion of participants with ≥1 self-reported hypoglycemic event per week in the isCGM+Coaching cohort only
Mean glucosefrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate mean glucose in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Glycemic variabilityfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate glycemic variability reported as SD and CV in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Percent sensor capturefrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate percent sensor capture in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Number of isCGM discontinuationsassessed at 3-6 month follow-upEvaluate the number of isCGM discontinuations in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts only at follow-up
Number of diabetes coaching program discontinuationsfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate the number of diabetes coaching program discontinuations, measured by the Diabetes Coaching Program survey in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Psychological distressfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate psychological distress measured by the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Glucose monitoring device satisfactionfrom enrollment to 3-6 month follow upEvaluate glucose monitoring device satisfaction measured by the Glucose Monitoring System Satisfaction Scale (GMSS) in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts
Proportion of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.0%assessed at 3-6 month follow-upEvaluate proportion of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.0% in the isCGM and isCGM+Coaching cohorts at follow-up only

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c by Ageassessed at 3-6 month follow-upEvaluate change in HbA1c at 3-6 months follow-up (±6 weeks) in the matched isCGM and CBG cohorts among adults with insulin-naïve T2D by age \< 65 years old vs ≥ 65 years old subgroups
Change in HbA1c by Baseline HbA1cassessed at 3-6 month follow-upEvaluate change in HbA1c at 3-6 months follow-up (±6 weeks) in the matched isCGM and CBG cohorts among adults with insulin-naïve T2D by baseline HbA1c (\< 8.5% vs ≥ 8.5% subgroups)

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026