Skip to content

Deep Sedation in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Using Deep Sedation vs. Conscious Sedation in Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Intraprocedural Management and Outcome Evaluation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06836999
Acronym
PRIORI-AF
Enrollment
1334
Registered
2025-02-20
Start date
2025-03-03
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal or Persistent, Conscious Sedation, Deep Sedations

Keywords

deep sedation, conscious sedation, catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation

Brief summary

The current practice of anesthesia for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (CA) procedure is inconsistent, including general anesthesia, deep sedation, and conscious sedation.Due to the nature of deep sedation, it has been continuously gaining its position as one of the crucial components in standard practices of atrial fibrillation ablation during the last decade. Currently, a considerable number of procedures have been done using conscious sedation. Previous studies explored the benefits obtained from the employment of deep sedation in AF ablation procedures, mainly focused on pain reduction and intra-procedural safety. However, the benefits on long-term rhythmic outcomes, peri-procedural safety as well as benefits on procedural parameters and peri-procedural experiences from patients/ablators/lab staff have yet not to be thoroughly studied. We plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of deep sedation in catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF in multiple prospective, i.e., quantified intraprocedural patients / physicians / lab staffs / mapper clinical specialist experiences, and the procedure safety.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdeep sedation

The deep sedation was inducted using atropine 0.5 mg iv administered 15 min before the procedure to avoid aspiration. In the EP lab, anesthesia preparation is performed, including invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring via puncture of the radial artery or brachial artery. Noninvasive BP monitoring every 5 minutes is also permitted. Subsequently, midazolam 1-2mg or accompanied with propofol 0.3-0.5 mg/kg is administered intravenously at the start of the CA procedure (i.e., femoral vein puncture), and fentanyl 25 µg is administered intravenously. Then, continuous titrated infusion of propofol 0.2-0.5mg/kg/h for anesthesia maintenance throughout the CA procedure. An additional iv fentanyl (25-50 µg) is administrated at the beginning of RF applications. Further boluses or additional drugs are administrated as needed to maintain analgesia during the procedure. The anesthesiologist is responsible for administering anesthesia and administering medication.

PROCEDUREConscious sedation

This protocol is aimed at analgesia, with local infiltration of lidocaine for femoral vein puncture followed by intravenous administration of fentanyl (1-2 ug/kg/h). The operator determines the dose of fentanyl and midazolam. A midazolam 1-5 mg bolus is administrated before electrical cardioversion is performed or when the patient is nervous.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The present trial utilized a centralized randomization system (IWRS) to facilitate the competitive enrollment of study participants and treatment randomization grouping. The investigator (anesthesiologist) carries out the given treatment according to the grouping information of the study participants. Throughout the course of the study, the treatment groups were kept blind to the researchers, with the exception of the anesthesiologist, the sponsor, and the study participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

● Patients diagnosed with AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing) at 18-75 years old who are eligible for the CA procedure

Exclusion criteria

* has received CA procedure for AF or atrial septal defect repair before enrollment * left atrial diameter (LAD) ≥55 mm or thrombosis in the left atrium; * eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73㎡ * a history of cerebrovascular disease within the last three months (including stroke and transient ischemic attack \[TIA\]) * acute or severe systemic infection * intolerant to sedation or with a history suggestive of sleep apnea * BMI \> 35 kg/㎡ * has contraindications to procedural sedation or refused to participate in this trial * Congenital heart disease, thyroid dysfunction, severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh classification B-C), severe coagulation dysfunction (international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 or partial activated prothrombin time (APTT) prolonged by ≥ 10 seconds, or plasma prothrombin time (PT) prolonged by ≥ 3 seconds, or fibrinogen (Fib) ≤ 1.5 g/L), or active bleeding * pregnant women, breastfeeding women or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period, those who have a positive pregnancy test result during the screening period * life expectancy \< 12 months * those who have participated in other clinical drug trials within 3 months prior to enrollment * those who are known to be allergic to any of the ingredients such as lidocaine, propofol, soybeans, peanuts, etc. * those who, in the judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for this clinical study (e.g., not in line with the treatment that the research participants the treatment, research participant compliance, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rhythm outcomes4-12month post-ablationThe primary effectiveness endpoint is the freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia (AF/AFL/AT lasting for over 30 seconds) recurrence monitored by ECG, 7-day ambulatory ECG, or equivalent cardiac monitoring from 4th to 12th month (9 months) after the procedure without taking I/III AADs. Patients who had to redo ablation or failed to discontinue I/III AADs after the blanking period are considered as primary endpoint

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Score of ablators', staffs',nurse's intraprocedural experiencesduring the CA procedureLikelihood to recommend (LTR) Questionnaire
respiratory system safety outcomeFrom the start of sedation to the end of the procedurethe incidence of intraprocedural severe decrease in blood oxygenation (decrease in fingertip oxygen saturation to less than 90% or a \>10% decrease in fingertip oxygen saturation from baseline),apnea, respiratory depression, need for ventilator-assisted ventilation, and need for respiratory stimulant therapy
Rate of re-ablation acceptances4-12month post-ablationRate of re-ablation acceptances if AF/AT recurrences.
Score of patients' intraprocedural experiencesduring the CA procedureQuestionnaires for patient:QoR-40 and Likelihood to recommend (LTR).
The dosage of painkillersduring the CA procedureThe dosage of painkillers
the incidence of regurgitation and aspiration and oral mucosal damage caused by oropharyngeal airwayFrom the start of sedation to the end of the procedurethe incidence of regurgitation and aspiration and oral mucosal damage caused by oropharyngeal airway
Procedure timeduring the CA procedureProcedure time (skin to skin), fluoroscopy, ablation time, etc.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYunlong Xia, Ph.D
yunlong_xia@126.com+86 18098875555
Backup ContactChengming Ma, MD
machengming@dmu.edu.cn+86 18098875759

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026