Skip to content

Comparison of Trifecta Analysis of Standard Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Urolithiasis

Comparison of Trifecta Analysis of Standard Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Urolithiasis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06836700
Acronym
Trifecta
Enrollment
180
Registered
2025-02-20
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
2024-03-15
Last updated
2025-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Stones, Urolithiasis, Calcium Oxalate

Keywords

Renal stone, PCNL

Brief summary

Introduction: Urolithiasis is a common urological condition, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely used treatment option. Trifecta analysis, which includes stone-free rate, reduced complications (Clavien- Dindo classification), and minimal need for auxiliary procedures, provides a standardized way to compare outcomes. This study evaluates the trifecta outcomes of standard PCNL and mini PCNL.

Detailed description

Methodology: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the department of urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar from Jan 2022 to March 2024. 180 consecutive individuals who were subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were registered for the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups using a lottery method. Both the standard PCNL group and mini PCNL group consisted of 90 patients each. Patients who required a change in the planned surgical procedure were replaced with new participants from the sample frame. A structured proforma was filled out for all preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables in administration of trifecta, and the data was analyzed using SPSS. An assessment was done for predictive factors for the trifecta using logistic regression to calculate the odds ratio, confidence interval (CI), and p value.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMini PCNL

90 Participants underwent MINI PCNL in MIN PCNL arm and 90 Participants underwent Standard PCNL in Standard PCNL arm.

Sponsors

Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study was executed as a single institution prospective cohort study at the department of urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, Pakistan. The study was conducted between January 2022 and March 2024, focusing on patients who were eligible for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for stone treatment. After getting IREB approval from the Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, (certificate no 341), all participants received a detailed explanation of the study objectives, methodology, potential benefits, and risks before providing informed consent. Sample Size Calculation & Patient Selection: The sample size was determined using OpenEpi calculator and a total of 180 consecutive patients scheduled for PCNL were selected from an initial sample frame of 200. To maintain randomness in group allocation, a simple random sampling technique using the lottery method was applied. Patients were equally distributed into two Groups:

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 16 and 65 years having renal stones exceeding 20 mm in diameter or having a density more than 1000 Hounsfield Units (HU) were included.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with residual stones following prior PCNL or other endourological procedures or active, untreated urinary tract infections or sepsis or patients with deranged coagulation profiles, were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone free ratesup to 4 weeks on post follow up imaging i.e CT KUB without contrastThis outcome measures that which modality provide better stone free rates. Mini or standard PCNL.
Post operative complications rateUp to 4 weeks days post operative periodTo find which modality has got lesser number of complications. Mini or standard PCNL
Need of auxiliary ProceduresUp to 4 weeks post operativelyto find which modality require the need of auxiliary Procedures like ESWL, URS, or Re DJS stenting.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026