Skip to content

Comparing Advanced Hemostasis and Ultrasound-Guided Puncture to Conventional Approaches in Distal Radial Access

Comparing Advanced Hemostasis and Ultrasound-Guided Puncture to Conventional Approaches in Distal Radial Access: A Dual Randomized Pragmatic Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06835829
Acronym
ALPHA&OMEGA
Enrollment
480
Registered
2025-02-19
Start date
2025-12-31
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Catheterization

Keywords

Trasnradial access, Distal radial access, Ultrasound guidance, Potassium ferrate, Hemostasis

Brief summary

Meta-analysis results show that distal radial access (DRA) is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of radial artery occlusion compared to conventional transradial access (TRA). This is of paramount importance in an evolving interventional context where an increasing number of radial access procedures are being performed to address a growing number of independent health conditions. DRA is also associated with a lower rate of vascular access-related adverse events, establishing it as the safest vascular access ever. However, available data show that the success rate of DRA is lower than that of conventional TRA. Also, while the duration of hemostasis has been shown to be shorter, it has most likely not yet reached its full potential for shortening. Thus, the two extreme phases of DRA require important further evaluation. The CompAring uLtrasound-guided Puncture and advanced HemostAsis to cOnventional approaches in distal radial access: a dual randoMizEd praGmatic triAl (ALPHA&OMEGA) trial will address this lack of knowledge by exploring whether a significantly shorter hemostasis duration can be achieved with DRA when using hemostasis enhancement and exploring whether ultrasound-guided puncture can increase the success rate of DRA.

Interventions

DEVICETransradial potassium ferrate hemostatic patch

Use of a potassium ferrate hemostatic patch to enhance transradial access hemostasis

DEVICEDistal radial potassium ferrate hemostatic patch

Use of a potassium ferrate hemostatic patch to enhance distal radial access hemostasis

Ultrasound guidance for distal radial access

Conventional guidance for distal radial access

Sponsors

Associazione per lo Studio delle Malattie Cardiovascolari Cardiva ONLUS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective open-label, randomized, controlled trial that integrates two independent nonfactorial randomized comparisons. In the first comparison, 480 patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either to conventional transradial access or distal radial access using the potassium ferrate patch for hemostasis enhancement. In the second comparison, the 240 patients assigned to distal radial access will be randomized 1:1 to either conventional artery puncture or ultrasound-guided puncture.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years. * Patients presenting with CCS or ACS, including unstable angina or NSTEMI. * Patients planned for coronary angiography or PCI. * Patients able to provide written informed consent. * Patient is willing to comply with all study protocol required evaluations. * Palpable radial pulse both at conventional and distal puncture site. * Reverse modified Barbeau test confirming radial artery patency in patients with a history of previous radial artery catheterization.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. * Cardiogenic shock. * Chronic hemodialysis. * Contraindications to radial access, such as occlusive upper arm peripheral artery disease, or known anatomic variants prohibiting TRA on both sides. * Medical conditions that may cause non-compliance with the study protocol and/or may confound the data interpretation. * Patients unable to provide written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemostasis duration.From end of procedure to end of hemostasis (25 minutes for distal radial access and 60 minutes for conventional transradial access)
Access successStarts when the anesthesia needle contacts the skin and stops when the introducer sheath has been properly placed (on average 1 minute)Access success occurs when an introducer sheath can be properly placed through the punctured artery.

Countries

Belgium, Italy

Contacts

CONTACTGregory A Sgueglia, MD, PhD
g.a.sgueglia@gmail.com+390651002864

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026