Skip to content

Comparative 3-year Study of Nissen-sleeve vs. Sleeve Plus Cruroplasty in Obese Patients With Hiatal Hernia

Comparative 3-year Study of Nissen-sleeve vs. Sleeve Plus Cruroplasty in Obese Patients With Hiatal Hernia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06835790
Acronym
HH-N Sleeve
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-02-19
Start date
2025-03-02
Completion date
2031-11-02
Last updated
2025-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hiatal Hernia, Obesity

Brief summary

The success of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is not only due to its proven efficacy in the treatment of obesity and associated to comorbidities in the short and long term, but also because it is considered as less technically complicated compared to other malabsorptive procedures. Unfortunately, the main long-term side effect of LSG appears to be the development of severe gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). This problem is aggravated by the concomitant presence of a hiatal hernia at the time of surgery. Indeed, by causing laxity of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the hiatal hernia reduces the barrier functions of the esophageal-gastric junction against the reflux of gastric contents. The classic combination of sleeve and hiatal hernia treatment by cruroplasty gives contradictory results and several surgeons prefer to perform only the sleeve without addressing the hiatal hernia especially if it is small (\<4 cm). For this reason a modification of the usual surgical technique of LSG has been proposed by adding a Nissen fundoplication-Nissen Sleeve (NS). The intentions of this technique were to minimize the rate of postoperative GERD especially for patients with hiatal hernia, to protect the staple line of the angle of His, and finally to provide a safe and effective alternative for patients with a contraindication to LRYGB due to GERD. Although the first results of the technique are encouraging, the realization of the Nissen valve remains a sensitive technical point that can transform a relatively simple procedure like LSG into a more complex procedure like NS. The only test able to directly identify and classify gastric reflux is pH-metry with or without esophageal manometry. Unfortunately, especially due to the difficulty of access to the examination, there are no studies with solid scientific bases that identify the correct conduct to adopt in the case of an obese patient with a hiatal hernia (with or without preoperative reflux). The main objective of this study is to evaluate the occurence or worsening of GERD at 3 years following a Nissen-sleeve vs. sleeve plus cruroplasty intervention in patients with obesity and hiatal hernia.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPh-measurement

Ph measurement before and after the surgery

OTHERQuestionnaires

GERD-HRQL Reflux symptom index scale before and after surgery

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTgastroduodenal transit

Imaging test that uses the properties of X-rays - after the administration of a radiopaque contrast agent (usually barium) - to visualize the upper digestive tract: the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum (the upper segment of the small intestine).

Sponsors

Clinique saint-Michel de Toulon
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Elsan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient, * Patient with severe obesity (BMI \>35) with comorbidity or morbidity (BMI \>40), * Patient awaiting a sleeve gastrectomy, * Patient with a hiatal hernia \<or= 4 cm, * Patient having undergone a gastroscopy, * Patient having undergone an esophagogastroduodenal transit (OGDT), * Patient having been informed and having given their free, informed and written consent, * Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security scheme.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with poorly controlled diabetes, * Patient with major esophageal motility disorders, * Patient with a Hiatal Hernia \> 4cm, * History of bariatric surgery, history of ring, * Patient refusing pH-metry examination, * Refusal to participate in the study, * Patient under legal protection, * Patient not benefiting from health protection, * Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appearance of GERD 3 years after surgery.3 yearsOccurrence if DeMeester score at 3 years is ≥ 14.72 (\<14.72 before surgery) and/or treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and/or Reflux Disease Questionnaire score \> 10 (≤10 before surgery) and/or GERD-HRQL score \> 16 (≤16 before surgery).
Worsening of GERD 3 years after surgery.3 yearsWorsening if increase in DeMeester score at 3 years compared to that before the intervention and/or introduction or increase in the dose of PPI compared to that before the intervention and/or increase in the Reflux Disease Questionnaire score at 3 years compared to that before the intervention and/or increase in the GERD-HRQL score at 3 years compared to that before the intervention.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactSergio D Carandina
sergio.carandina@gmail.com00334 94 03 96 20

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026