Skip to content

Comparison of Current Subgingival Debridement Methods

Comparison of Current Subgingival Debridement Methods: Clinical Trial with 6 Months Follow-up

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06835452
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-02-19
Start date
2024-07-24
Completion date
2025-02-07
Last updated
2025-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Guided Biofilm Therapy, Subgingival Debridement, Subgingival Plaque, Treatment of Periodontitis

Keywords

guided biofilm therapy, periodontitis, subgingival debridement

Brief summary

Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of current subgingival debridement methods used in the treatment of Stage 1 and Stage 2 periodontitis patients, the aesthetic condition achieved after these treatments, and the pain felt during treatment. 90 female patients who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (Stage 1-2) and required supra-subgingival scaling for treatment purposes, and who volunteered to participate in the study, were included in the study. Three treatment groups were determined. 30 people were included in each group. Periodontal examination was performed before and after the treatments in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month and the data on the collected periodontal parameters were analyzed.

Detailed description

Periodontal parametreler Gingival index, plaque index, periodontal pocket depth and bleeding index on probing. It was evaluated with the visual analog scale for pain and aesthetics.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy patient (without known chronic disease) * Periodontal diagnostic data (Gingival Index, Plaque Index, Periodontal pocket depths, Attachment loss, Radiological data-Bone loss data) are complete * Treatments diagnosed with stage 1-2 periodontitis and those who have not had periodontal treatment in the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Having a systemic disease * Pregnant and lactating women * smoker * Those who do not want to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival indexbaseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month4 surfaces of all teeth (distal, buccal, mesial, lingual) are evaluated 0= Normal gingiva 1. Mild inflammation - slight discoloration, slight edema. There is no bleeding after probing. 2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and shine. Bleeding after probing. 3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026