Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Conditions
Brief summary
In this study, investigated the hemodynamic differences between patients who underwent acute normovolemic hemodilution during the Autologous Blood Collection procedure in coronary artery bypass graft surgery and those who did not, using hemodynamic and cardiac data obtained by MostCare's pressure recording analytical method (PRAM).
Detailed description
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries are surgeries in which the need for blood transfusion is high. Allogeneic transfusion and transfusion-related complications have led researchers to use different techniques. Autologous blood collection method is one of the alternative methods used to eliminate the need for transfusion. The acute normovolemic hemodilution technique traditionally applied during autologous blood collection causes hemodilution in CABG surgeries and increases the risk of bleeding in patients. In this study, vasopressor infusion technique was used as an alternative technique to avoid hemodilution during autologous blood collection. These two techniques (Acute normovolemic hemodilution - Vasopressor infusion) applied to maintain hemodynamic stabilization during autologous blood collection were compared with the advanced cardiac and hemodynamic data provided by the pressure recording analytical method. The primary aim of the study was to compare cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE), which is a cardiac performance parameter and provides estimates of the energy spent by the cardiovascular system to maintain hemodynamic balance. Secondary objectives are to compare other advanced hemodynamic and postoperative laboratory parameters.
Interventions
PROCEDUREAcute normovolemic hemodilutions
Crystalloid infusion throughout the autologous blood collection (3 ml of crystalloid infusion for every 1 ml of blood)
DRUGVasopressor infusion
Vasopressor infusion throughout the autologous blood collection (according to mean arterial pressure)
Sponsors
Ataturk University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age at least 18 years * Undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery under general anesthesia * Invasive blood pressure (radial or femoral) and Mostcare monitoring * Recruitment after booking for surgery with sufficient time to read, understand and question study patient information prior to attending for surgery * Ability and willingness to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Refuse to consent to the study * Arterial wave form distortion * Cardiac arrhythmia * Inappropriate identification of the dicrotic notch for any reason * Hemodynamic instability defined as mean arterial blood pressure \< 65 mmHg * Preoperative requirement of inotrope/vasopressor infusion * Preoperatively receiving vasoactive drugs * Patients fitted with an intra-aortic balloon pump * Patients fitted with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * Critically ill patients requiring preoperative intensive care unit * Presence of intraabdominal hypertension * New York Heart Association Class 3-4 heart failure * Congestive heart failure with ejection fraction \< 35% * Glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 * Ongoing renal replacement therapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the effects of different techniques used for autologous blood collection on Cardiac Cycle Efficiency (CCE) changes obtained by pulse contour analysis. | From the beginning to the end of autologous blood collection (in the first 30 minutes of surgery) | Difference of Cardiac Cycle Efficiency(CCE) PRAM parameters between patients |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the Contractility (dP/dtmax mmHg/msec), Stroke Volume Index (SVI mL/m2), Cardiac Power Index (CPI W/m2), Arterial Elastance (Ea mmHg/mL), Stroke Volume Variation (SVV %), Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV %) changes | From the beginning to the end of autologous blood collection (in the first 30 minutes of surgery) | Difference of other PRAM and traditional hemodynamic parameters between patients |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed