Skip to content

Comparison Between Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy & Anchor Technique Tenotomy with Clinical and Ultrasound Assessment

Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy Versus Anchor Tenotomy Technique, Clinical Outcome and Ultrasound Assessment

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06833398
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-02-18
Start date
2025-06-30
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anchor Tenotomy, Simple Biceps Tenotomy

Keywords

Arthroscopic biceps tenotomy, Long head of biceps tendon (LHB) Popeye deformity Ultrasound assessment

Brief summary

Comparison between arthroscopic simple biceps tenotomy & anchor tenotomy technique regarding clinical outcomes & ultrasound assessment

Detailed description

This research compares two surgical techniques for addressing pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon: arthroscopic simple biceps tenotomy and anchor tenotomy. The LHB tendon, originating from the supraglenoid tubercle, plays a critical role in forearm supination, elbow flexion, and shoulder abduction. Pathologies affecting this tendon often cause significant shoulder pain, with surgical options including tenotomy and tenodesis. While simple tenotomy is quick and avoids implant complications, it may result in cosmetic deformities like the Popeye sign and muscle cramps. Anchor tenotomy, a novel technique, aims to minimize these issues by preventing the Popeye deformity. This study employs a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial design at Assiut University Hospitals, involving 72 patients with LHB pathologies such as tendinitis, rotator cuff tears, and subacromial impingement. Exclusion criteria include prior tenodesis or neuromuscular diseases. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using functional scores (e.g., Oxford Shoulder Score), ultrasound evaluation of tendon positioning, and follow-up examinations at intervals up to one year post-surgery. The primary outcome focuses on the presence of the Popeye deformity, while secondary outcomes include postoperative shoulder function and tendon distalization measured via ultrasound. This research aims to provide evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness of these two techniques in improving clinical outcomes and minimizing complications.

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy:

Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy: This procedure involves an arthroscopic release of the LHB tendon from its attachment at the superior glenoid labrum. It is a quick and simple technique that does not require implants or extensive postoperative rehabilitation. The main drawback is the potential for developing a Popeye deformity, where the biceps muscle bulges due to distal migration, as well as occasional muscle cramps.

PROCEDUREAnchor Tenotomy Technique:

Anchor Tenotomy Technique: This is a novel arthroscopic method where, after releasing the LHB tendon, it is anchored in place to prevent distal migration. The goal of this technique is to avoid the Popeye deformity and improve cosmetic outcomes while maintaining functional integrity. This procedure is technically more challenging and may involve a longer operative time compared to simple tenotomy.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with LHB pathologies such as : Biceps tendinitis Rotator cuff tears Subacromial impengiment Instability & traumatic causes

Exclusion criteria

* LHB Tenodesis Patients with neuromuscular disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
evaluate for popeye sign after arthroscopic simple biceps tenotomy vs anchor technique tenotomy1 yearclinical evaluation of shoulder function postoperative by dynamometer & US assessment of LHB tendon distalization after LHB tenotomy . Remove

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactahmed S shehata, bachelor of medicine
Ahmed.15248388@med.aun.edu.eg01010527046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026