Skip to content

AI-based Low Dose CBCT Reconstruction for Clinical Application

AI-based Low Dose CBCT Reconstruction for Lung Puncture Guidance: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06831617
Enrollment
400
Registered
2025-02-18
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Nodule

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Lung Nodule, Cone Beam CT, Lung Puncture, Images Reconstruction

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if AI-based low dose CBCT reconstructed images can guide lung puncture effectively. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the AI-based low dose CBCT reconstruction model reconstruct high quality images? 2. Is it possible that low-dose CBCT reconstructed images can guide lung puncture procedures without compromising the efficiency of the procedure? Researchers will compare AI-based low dose CBCT reconstructed images to a placebo (conventional CBCT images) to see if AI-based low dose CBCT reconstructed image can guide lung puncture procedures without compromising the efficiency of the procedure. Participants will: 1. Undergo lung puncture under AI-based low dose CBCT reconstructed images guidance or under conventional CBCT images 2. Be followed up for 1 week postoperative to obtain patient complications

Interventions

OTHERAI-based low dose CBCT reconstructed images system

Participants in the experimental group undergo AI-based low dose (radiation dose is 1/6th of the dose used in the clinic) CBCT reconstructed images guided lung puncture procedures.

OTHERConventional CBCT images system

Participants in the experimental group undergo conventional CBCT images guided lung puncture procedures.

Sponsors

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who require CBCT-guided precutaneous lung puncture (PLP) and meet the clinical indications for the procedure. * Participants whose physical condition is suitable for PLP. * Participants are willing to sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants have metallic implants in the body, which severely affects the image quality. * Participants are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Participants are unwilling or unable to sign informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of puncture needles of participants undergoing percutaneous lung puncture procedures.From enrollment to the end of the lung puncture procedure.The number of punctures was defined as the number of punctures performed throughout the percutaneous lung puncture procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiation DoseFrom enrollment to the end of the lung puncture procedure.Radiation dose was defined as the radiation dose generated throughout the percutaneous lung puncture procedure.
Intraoperative and postoperative complications of participants undergoing lung puncture proceduresFrom enrollment to the end of the lung puncture procedure at 1 week.Intraoperative and postoperative complications were defined as those arising in parricipants during percutaneous lung puncture and within 7 days after puncture.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Algorithmic performance (peak signal-to-noise ratio)Through study completion, an average of 9 months.Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is a metric used to measure the quality of an image or video, assessing the degree of distortion by comparing the peak signal power to the mean square error (MSE) between the original signal and the compressed or processed signal. PSNR is measured in decibels (dB), with higher values indicating less distortion and better image or video quality.
Algorithmic performance (structural similarity)Through study completion, an average of 9 months.Structural similarity (SSIM) is a metric for evaluating the similarity of two images. SSIM value is between 0 and 1, the larger the value, the more similar the images are.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHuangxuan Zhao, PhD
zhao_huangxuan@sina.com+8618971676985

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026